He was a good husband. Out of the blue, his wife filed for divorce. She probably cheated on him before. So he snapped. He drugged her and tied her to the bed, while unconscious. Then he waited, to make sure she was awake and would feel the mutilation. He cut off her breasts and ground them up in the garbage disposal. Isn’t that funny? She sure will never die of breast cancer! Then he cut off her clitoris, and glued her vagina shut with ample quantities of super-glue. Teaches the slut a lesson!
Then, in a TV talk show, a group of men makes fun of the story. Isn’t it hilarious? The spectators have hearty laughs and giggles. Of course, it is not the same as cutting off a man’s penis, because a penis is softer then a woman’s breast. One moderate man actually says she did not deserve it, but he can think of a woman’s crime where he would do just the same.
If a woman divorced him, got 50% of his salary (before taxes) and gots him jailed for non-payment. Then he would discover he was cuckolded, the child was not his kid, and the courts still held him responsible for payment because he had acted as a good father and he was too trusting to do a DNA test early enough. Then the rage is understandable and she really deserves it. She still will recover and can take care of the bastard child.
Participants and audience laugh and giggle. They all agree, full of understanding.
He realized every man’s secret dream. All men secretly dream of sexually mutilating a woman, to teach her a lesson.
I just inverted the sexes, for demonstration purposes.
Men are not that vile. Never ever would a male talk show host, audience, guests condone such barbarity against women, or make fun of it. Only women are that mean, violent and vengeful to joke and make fun of male mutilation! It is the secret fantasy of many women to cut off a man’s penis. (People say this statement is misogynistic. I did not make this up, watch the video to believe that those woman have a good time joking about this abuse of a man)
Lorena Bobbitt cut off her husband’s penis and later demanded and got an excuse. Of course, she got no jail sentence for that. She was justified because he was a philanderer and cheated. She had real fan clubs. Go ahead and google "Lorena Bobbitt jokes". John Waine Bobbitt never went as far as many women to, he never got a baby from a mistress, much less made his wife pay and care for a baby that was not hers. He just, allegedly, cheated. Amazingly his penis was found and re-attached.
Catherine Kieu mutilates husband | YouTube
Catherine Kieu, 48 learned from Lorena’s mistake. Her husband would not get his penis back. She planned meticulously. She drugged him first, tied him up. Made sure he was awake to see and feel the punishment he deserved. After cutting off the penis, she ground it up with the sink’s electric garbage disposal. So she could be sure he never will use it again. A wonder she did not grind it while it was still attached. Or put it through a meat grinder, so he could look at it afterwards? She left him tied up. It is amazing that he did not bleed to death. She was very nice to call police, so after a long delay he finally got medical attention and would stay alive, so he could live the rest of his life without a penis and ponder what he did wrong. He must have done something to hurt her, make her angry, to deserve it.
The tax payer is paying her lawyer. I am sure he will plead battered woman syndrome, not guilty for reasons of insanity. After all, Lorena Bobbitt got away without punishment.
It is not clear if she destroyed his testicles, too. In that case, our hero would also have to extract the woman’s ovaries, to make the above example equal to Caterine’s crime.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Man cut off wife’s breast and super-glued her vagina.” »
Man cut off wife’s breast and super-glued her vagina.
» continues here »
![gal_hefner_harris[3]](http://human-stupidity.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/gal_hefner_harris31.jpg "gal_hefner_harris[3]")
We do have loop holes in our sex offender laws. Obviously, Hugh Hefner preying on a woman 60 years younger is a perversion. This is just disgusting. We need laws against that. Sex or marriage with anyone more then 3 years older or younger should be a felony. That is, if the older party is male, of course. Sexual liberation of Cougars, of the protected class "female" may not suffer consequences for their actions. May be, in this case, a 21 year old young man is taking advantage of a 51 year old woman who is unable to consent due to her irrational attraction?
“Excuse me. Miss. I would like to talk to you. 
The victim devotes his life, finances and his dedication, love and effort of decades to a lie. Not just the money, but his life’s dedication 
Sexual harassment started with quid pro quo harassment, (="sexual shakedown", extended to all relationships with power imbalance, added peer harassment (which "sets the stage for campus rape" ),, contrapower harassment” and closed the circle with grooming and electronic harassment, Thus Title IX, an anti discrimination law, went full circle to selectively discriminate against males and heterosexuality. MacKinnon: sexual harassment ‘ is done by men to women regardless of’ relative position on the formal hierarchy.". 
The SHI (sexual harassment industry) trains women to become more and more un-empowered, vulnerable and sensitive. So ridiculously weak, that for a "reasonable woman", innuendo, 
Sleights as small as touching a student’s hair or praising (or criticizing) a student’s paper are dramatized as "devastating experience" that "is life changing". Creation of a hostile environment by claiming, in class, that 
Such concepts as "merit, rigor, standards, and excellence" are viewed as code words to promote " discriminatorv self-interest" on the part of the powerful (p. 311). "Academic freedom" is it slogan touted by "white male faculty" but, she gleefully affirms, one now increasingly challenged by "nonacademic" folk. "To many," Hippensteele writes, "academic freedom is currently being used as it license to speak and behave irresponsibly" (p. 311). 
Such men can either suffer the rest of their lives in poverty, in the Gulag jail of feminist dictatorship. Or they can act like men and fight back. 
Men and women march through East Los Angeles high crime neighborhood during the money-slut walk, which organizers described as a demonstration against those who blame the victims of robberies.
