Category: Political correctness

Singapore fails to recognize human rights of rioters. Fantastic!

When will Paris and London follow Singapore’s example? So ordinary citizens in London and Paris are not exposed to three day long riots that burn down entire city blocks. We believe it is criminal omission, when armed police don’t interfere and instead watch rioters setting family businesses ablaze.

The riot on December 8, Singapore’s worst outbreak of violence in four decades, saw hundreds of South Asian workers go on a rampage that left 39 people, including police officers, injured and 25 vehicles damaged or burnt.

It was triggered after an Indian construction worker was hit by a bus and killed at a district known as Little India, where tens of thousands of South Asian labourers converge on weekends.  source

This is the problem. In civilized society we don’t riot because of a traffic accident. We civilized people don’t riot at all.

But any mishap that happens to Blacks justifies mayhem

Human-Rights, nowadays are always for criminals. Human Rights are concerned with the right of criminals and thugs like Rodney King, Trayvon Martin, 

 

Activists say the swift punishments being handed out contravene basic human rights.

Here is the problem. Human Rights encourage riots and violence.

Political correctness tells people that their misfortune, their unskilled job is never due to low intelligence, low effort, bad parents, or lack of impulse control (which leads to violent crime and rioting).

Rather we tell these menial workers that they could have become engineers, or bank managers, were it not for heinous discrimination.  Thus Political correctness dogma incites "justified" anger in people, against their repressors.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Singapore fails to recognize human rights of rioters. Fantastic!” »
Singapore fails to recognize human rights of rioters. Fantastic!
» continues here »

Lulu Application sued, outlawed in Brazil: privacy or censorship?

The Press reports that a Brazilian man sued Lulu and Facebook for defamation and breach of intimacy, conveniently omitting that TubbyApp, the Lulu Version for Men to rate women was already outlawed by a Brazilian court.

Women always tend to be more equally protected under the law, then men.

The male version of the Application (TubbyApp), was outlawed by the judge of the Special Court for Crimes against Women in Belo Horizonte   MSN

May I mention that there are no special courts for Crimes against men, for prison rape, Lorena Bobbitt dick slicing, false rape accusation victims,  birth control fraud, cuckolding child support fraud, or protection about indentured slavery of life time alimony enforced by debtor’s prison

who decided that the App Store and Google Play must not offer the application for download in Brazil, and who disallowed the social network Facebook to connect data of their users to the application, under punishment of BRL 10 000 per day for disobeying that order.MSN

The Brazilian constitution in article 5 IV allows freedom of expression but explicitly prohibits anonymity.MSN

The Brazilian constitution protects the inviolability of the image, honor, reputation and privacy of people and gives the right to sue for moral and material damages, when violated.

Human-Stupidity finds it offensive that one may not tell the truth while protected against retaliation, and understands that such laws hamper freedom of press and expression. Photographers can get sued for showing a person in unflattering poses while in public, and Google got sued by a man who vomited while Google Street view drove by.

On the other hand, we understand concerns about privacy. Imagine a happily married man like Tiger Woods would read 20 ratings on Lulu, about his sexual performance.

This breach of privacy would be very detrimental, and we actually would suggest the press to return to the old ethics code that kept John F. Kennedy’s trysts with Marilyn Monroe and other women out of public sight.  The opposite is happening, as Dominique Strauss-Kahn and Jörg Kachelmann found out, when falsely accused of rape. 

I believe Germany gives such privacy rights to individuals but exempts public persons like politicians from such legal protection.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Lulu Application sued, outlawed in Brazil: privacy or censorship?” »
Lulu Application sued, outlawed in Brazil: privacy or censorship?
» continues here »

"They fight like girls" is prohibited by BBC speech code

 

On Saturday the BBC made its football commentator and former Liverpool striker Robbie Fowler apologise on air for describing two footballers as "fighting like girls". It made for uncomfortable viewing. It was obvious to any viewer with more than one brain cell that Fowler’s comment, made about a tussle between Fernando Torres and Jan Vertonghen during the Tottenham-Chelsea game, was entirely innocent, intended only to condemn Torres and Vertonghen’s childish antics and not to slander the female sex. Yet minutes later, having clearly had a word in his ear from PC producers, a red-faced Robbie was making an embarrassing climbdown and telling the nation he was "deeply sorry" for apparently offending womankind. It was an ugly and humiliating spectacle.

It is not just football. Harassment laws have poisoned the work place for male expression and freedom of thought. Street harassment will soon be a crime too. Speech codes protect every conceivable minority, and even the majority (women are over 50% of the population).  Racial jokes, ethnic jokes, even academic research on taboo topics are censored (Rind study, race and iq)

In Scotland, the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications Act makes it a crime for Celtic and Rangers fans to sing “sectarian” or even political songs. Last month it was announced that every single footballer in the Premier League will have to attend lessons about the use of homophobic and racist language, presumably to cleanse their dumb, working-class brains of their foul prejudices. The Football Association has declared war on the use of homophobic language at football grounds, which includes obliterating not only offensive words like “queer” but also, once again, jokey phrases about “girls” and “manning up”. The FA is also trying to stop Tottenham Hotspur fans from referring to themselves as Yids and the Yid Army, something they’ve done for years. The Crown Prosecution Service itself has warned football clubs not to allow their fans to “cross the line [into] inappropriate crowd behaviour and chanting”. But who decides what is appropriate and inappropriate chanting? Surely it should be fans themselves rather than the snobby, censorious suits and PC phrase-police who have become an ugly blot on the beautiful game in recent years?

Source: The BBC’s humiliation of Robbie Fowler shows that football is fair game for censorship

Thanks to the antifeminist for the above link.

God praise the US constitution, with its freedom of speech clauses. Freedom of speech is less curtailed in the US then elsewhere. See

Behavior in general gets over criminalized. Children in the US get expelled for carrying a half inch micro replica of a gun, or for shooting pellet guns in the privacy of their back yard. And of course, anything sexual, teenage sexuality or child porn which often is neither porn (see copine scale) nor a child (17).

Political correctness slowly but surely curtails our freedom and instates a reign of harassment and terror.

Baby born to man, without female help, has no mother

A biological miracle happened in Berlin. A man gave birth to a child.

He chose home birth, because in Germany, hospitals are required, by law, to inform the name of the mother to the registry.

He insisted to be registered as the father, creating major confusion in the bureaucracy of the official birth registry.  The German civil law code allows him to legally be a man, though s/he is biologically a woman. It is a humane gesture, to save him/her the pain and trouble to undergo sex change operation and still have the sex gender he wishes. It requires only two psychologists

He wanted to hide the gender sex of the baby, but was obliged to register the baby with his/her correct sex. Officials at the registry worry: if the baby is a girl, will s/he educate her as a boy?

Human-Stupidity Analysis

The slippery slope of political correctness always overshoots. Giving someone a chance to live his life as if he were a different sex may be a friendly humane gesture.

But political correctness is about creating legally enforceable special RIGHTS. Making this sex change a legal right to wreak havoc with our legal system, to oblige schools to re-emit diplomas with the "correct" new gender. We occupy courts with her/his legal rights, their offended if someone addresses them by the wrong gender. Our father is of the female sex but of the male gender.

Imagine this bizarre case (double sex change)

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Baby born to man, without female help, has no mother” »
Baby born to man, without female help, has no mother
» continues here »

George Zimmerman verdict: guilty in public opinion. Lawyer Mark O’Mara’s toothless defense is the culprit

Zimmerman’s guilt could not be proven

Top: 5 years ago little Trayvon and Geore on his booking photo looked like thisGeorge Zimmerman is considered guilty in the public opinion. George, vigorously pursued little weak innocent Trayvon Martin, and gunned down an unarmed teenager who only carried skittles and ice tea and who dreamed of . Defense lawyer Marc O’Mara managed to raise reasonable doubt. Thus the jury had to acquit, because Zimmerman’s guilt could not clearly be proven beyond reasonable doubt. Zimmerman is guilty, but the prosecution just failed to to convincingly prove Zimmerman’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

George Zimmerman‘s lawyer Marc O’Mara’s defense won a battle but lost the war. George Zimmerman is a world-wide pariah. We read the press in Germany and Brazil.

 

trayvon-with-babyMSN Brazil calls Zimmermann Assassin.
  • Press media’s lies, deceit about George Zimmermann trial

    • George Zimmermann Acquitted: Victim of Government and Black Racism ("Der Spiegel" lügt: George Zimmerman, Opfer von schwarzem Rassismus und Verleumdungen)

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Below recent photos of Martin and Zimmerman

    Sheep succumbs to attack dog
    Aggressive, well trained Al Sharpton

    faces off with toothless lawyer Marc O’Mara

    Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

     

    Al Sharpton Grills George Zimmerman’s Attorney In Long, Contentious Interview

    How civil rights activists and the press would like to picture Trayvon Martin and George ZimmermannA firmly convinced partisan Al Sharpton

    Sharpton asked O’Mara how Zimmerman can plead self-defense if, as heard in the 911 tape, he was actively pursuing Martin, contrary to the advice of the operator.

    Al Sharpton firmly tells a damaging narrative "Zimmerman chased Martin". Sharpton is firm and convinced, and thus convincing. Sharpton does not care about evidence, proof, or if his story is true or not. He firmly believes what he says and thus convincing( Robert Trivers: Self deception, Robert Kurzban).  He is unimpeded by doubts, reasonableness, fairness. A partisan. Al Sharpton does not care if it is true or not.

    A pondering, objective, unsure O’MaraHow Media would like to depict them (Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman)

    O’Mara argued that there’s no conclusive evidence to suggest continued pursuit, nor is there evidence Zimmerman initiated any physical confrontation

    O’Mara’s lame reply comes over like this: "Well, Zimmerman is guilty, he chased down the poor teenager and started the fight. But it can not be conclusively proven. Of course, I understand and respect your opinion, Mr. Sharpton, but you can not prove it"

    OK, he did not say this, but that is what it sounds to an unsophisticated TV viewer that has been exposed to the relentless smear campaign against George Zimmerman.

    Marc O’Mara seems to be trying himself to figure out what really happened and who started the fight. A reasoned, legalese, open minded opinion behooves a judge, not a defense lawyer, much less a TV propagandist.

     

    Marc O’Mara lacks aggressive forward defense and counter attack

    1) tell the truth

    Mr. Sharpton, you are dreaming. Mr. Zimmerman stopped and waited, Trayvon Martin came back and viciously assaulted and attacked George. 

    obama-if-i-had-a-son-hed-look-like-trayvon-birth-certificate-sad-hill-news-33

    2) challenge: Sharpton’s story is preposterous and makes no sense

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “George Zimmerman verdict: guilty in public opinion. Lawyer Mark O’Mara’s toothless defense is the culprit” »
    George Zimmerman verdict: guilty in public opinion. Lawyer Mark O&…
    » continues here »

    MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow?

    George Zimmerman is an assassin. MSN Brazil spreads this slanderous news in their Brazilian version. George Zimmerman was acquitted and thus must not be called a murderer or assassin. 

    Not satisfied with the normal lies and deceit in the George Zimmerman case, MSN resort to illegal slander. Good for George, to get multi million dollar lawsuit against msn. Before, CBS had doctored the 911 tapes and is being sued by George Zimmerman

    Americanos saem às ruas para pedir justiça contra assassino de Trayvon Martin

    IMG_21072013_081229

    George Zimmerman has been the victim of a concerted defamation campaign ever since black civil rights leaders got wind of the case.

     

    They lied to you, hid evidence.
    Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors

     

    Dear Jurors,

    you have been lied to, misled, deceived. Above all, judge and lawyers withheld relevant information from you.

    Nevertheless, the George Zimmerman case was so clear cut, that you, the Jury, still arrived at the right verdict.  In spite of relentless attempts to mislead you, and in spite of relevant facts having been hidden from you.

    But, sadly, you had and still have doubts as to Zimmerman’s innocence. You were far from totally convinced of George Zimmerman‘s innocence, beyond reasonable doubt.

    [It is the] media’s claim last year that a neighborhood-watch captain in Florida [George Zimmerman] had hunted down a black teenager [Trayvon Martin] and shot him dead just for wearing a hoodie. 1

    1. If it were not for criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey this trial would not exist
    2. Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at a place where he had been 4 minutes earlier.
    3. The media and the prosecution never came up with a coherent story of what they think has happened.
    4. Trayvon Martin, on suspension for drugs, for punching bus driver. A violent burglar upset about being followed?  Texts show Trayvon Martin ‘hostile’ day of shooting
    5. The prosecution’s main witnesses are Martin’s intimate friends and family that have been carefully prepared by "civil rights activists" and lawyers as to what to say (or lie).
    6. (6) Trayvon Martin’s shady thuggish character, Black crime and ghetto rap culture

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow?” »
    MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow?
    » continues here »

    They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors

    Dear Jurors,

    you have been lied to, misled, deceived. Above all, judge and lawyers withheld relevant information from you.

    Nevertheless, the George Zimmerman case was so clear cut, that you, the Jury, still arrived at the right verdict.  In spite of relentless attempts to mislead you, and in spite of relevant facts having been hidden from you.

    But, sadly, you had and still have doubts as to Zimmerman’s innocence. You were far from totally convinced of George Zimmerman‘s innocence, beyond reasonable doubt.

    [It is the] media’s claim last year that a neighborhood-watch captain in Florida [George Zimmerman] had hunted down a black teenager [Trayvon Martin] and shot him dead just for wearing a hoodie. 1

    1. If it were not for criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey this trial would not exist
    2. Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at a place where he had been 4 minutes earlier.
    3. The media and the prosecution never came up with a coherent story of what they think has happened.
    4. Trayvon Martin, on suspension for drugs, for punching bus driver. A violent burglar upset about being followed?  Texts show Trayvon Martin ‘hostile’ day of shooting
    5. The prosecution’s main witnesses are Martin’s intimate friends and family that have been carefully prepared by "civil rights activists" and lawyers as to what to say (or lie).
    6. (6) Trayvon Martin’s shady thuggish character, Black crime and ghetto rap culture

     

     

     

    (1) The trial could only start due to criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey

    .There never was a case that an honest prosecutor could have brought to court, and that an unbiased judge would have allowed to proceed.

     

    In reference to the George Zimmerman trial’s whistleblower who lost his job at the State Attorney’s Office, Dershowitz says Angela Corey should face “disciplinary action” for “deliberately withholding and suppressing” evidence submitted to George Zimmerman’s defense and the judge. He claims Corey “withheld other evidence in the course of the pretrial and trial proceedings.”  7

    You would arrive at the conclusion that Zimmermann is innocent beyond reasonable doubt, and that Trayvon Martin is a murderous aggressor, beyond reasonable doubt.

     

    (2) Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at the place where he had been 240 seconds earlier.

    Path and time line

    The final fight and the killing happened about 60 yards from Zimmerman’s car and 60 yards from Trayvon Martin’s destination. Trayvon Martin, without any doubt, returned to where he was a few minutes before. This is inevitable logic, because the fight happened where Zimmermann was originally.

    Two maps trying to explain George’s and Trayvon’s path

    trayvon-martin-george-zimmerman-map-with-911-call-timing-v-3-1

     

     

    If the prosecution and the press were right, out of shape Zimmermann  chased after football athlete Trayvon.

    Trayvon could have simply entered his house, but chose not to do so. Trayvon could have simply outrun Zimmerman but chose not to do so.

     

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors” »
    They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman&#8…
    » continues here »

    "This is for Trayvon" beatings. The true Trayvon Martin

     

    Police: Men beat jogger in retaliation of Zimmerman verdict
    "He said, ‘Do you know who Trayvon is?’ I said, ‘No,’ thinking of somebody local. He said, ‘Trayvon Martin.’ I said ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘I’m going to beat you … For Trayvon.’ "
    Dickey says the men kicked and beat him in the head until he was unconscious. Photos of Dickey after the beating show bruises on his face.

    One more example of revenge for the acquittal:  Witness claims youths yelled ‘this is for Trayvon’ in beating

    Of course, there were more such cases in the last few years. Blacks used to beat whites in revenge for Trayvon. Now they finally figured out that they have to take revenge on Hispanics.

    Most of it is this hate is fueled by media’s lies and political correctness. If the press told the truth about George Zimmerman‘s injuries, about Trayvon Martin’s street fighting past time, they would better understand why the acquittal is totally justified.

     

    What I learned from the Zimmerman trial

    • Black folks will always side with another black in a fight, regardless of the merits. That includes President Barack Obama and US attorney general Eric Holder.
    • Even after the jury acquitted Zimmerman, Obama and Holder attacked Zimmerman, praised Martin, and threatened to prosecuted Zimmerman again.
    • The authorities will send an innocent man to prison, if it reduces the chances of race riots. Judges and prosecutors will lie and cheat to destroy people.
    • It is normal for black people to go around calling a non-black person a creepy-ass cracka.
    • Blacks adamantly assert that black kids have a right to beat up anyone they perceive as following them.

     

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “"This is for Trayvon" beatings. The true Trayvon Martin” »
    "This is for Trayvon" beatings. The true Trayvon Martin
    » continues here »