Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception
- Stupidity-Dogmas
- Assisted Suicide & Right to die
- Child Porn Witch Hunt
- Economics
- Faulty Science
- Human Rights
- Inspiring Intelligent Solutions
- Intelligent Design (Creationism)
- Irrational Drug Policy
- Men's Rights & Feminism
- Political correctness
- Prostitution
- Race & Intelligence
- Religion & Atheism
- Social Rules & Habits
- Teenage Sexuality
- Unhealty Lifestyle
- Victimless Crime
- Science
- Drugs
- Humor
- Uninformedness
Posts Tagged child abuse
Oregon Senate approved bill (to require computer technicians to report child pornography) will cause unnecessary suffering
Posted by admin in Child Porn Witch Hunt on
Do report teenage self shots, bath photos of nude toddlers, 17-year-old-girl-in-leotards-movies
It is time now technicians learn what child pornography is. Do you know? You think child pornography is photos of 7 year olds in explicit sexual activities? You really have no clue about the law!
17 year olds have become "children", department store children’s swim suit catalogue photos become child porn when collected by a person who seems to have prurient reasons to collect such photos. Knox vs. USA determined that photos of 15 year olds in Leotards can constitute child pornography
Can you imagine all the cell phone repair-men now are required by law to turn in adolescents for taking their own photograph or having a photograph the girl friend sent? Sexting teens in Oregon will prefer to destroy defective cell phones to getting free warranty repairs that might land them in jail.
- Sexting: Courts victimize Teens with child porn charges for exchanging their own nude photos
- Sexting children Margarite, Isaiah in Lacey, Washington avoid jail
We wonder why the law does not include teachers and parents in their duty to report and criminalize adolescents. With some effort, 20-30% of adolescents could be criminally persecuted just for sexting. Remember, receiving the photos is a heinous crime, too.
Oregon’s Senate approved a bill that requires computer technicians to report images of child pornography
The measure passed the state Senate on a 24-1 vote Friday and now heads to the governor for signature or veto.
Technicians who believe they may have spotted images of child porn must notify the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, the state Department of Human Services or law enforcement. Failure to do so could result in a misdemeanor charge.
Only a misdemeanor? We think technicians should get mandatory felony charges </sarcasm>
We are surprised, that in this day and age where toddlers play with cell phones, no 7 year olds have yet been arrested for photographing themselves nude or their doctor plays. It will happen!
And don’t forget all the family photos of babies taking bath, changing diapers. They all need to be analyzed painstakingly by police and and highly paid defense lawyers to see if baby poses in a way that the perverted mind of a public prosecutor considers sexually enticing or provocative.
Privacy laws? Technicians snooping our income tax return?
So the technician now is encouraged to snoop cell phones and computers to find child pornography? What if he finds the income tax return? Insider information about the stock market? Or stories about adult love affairs? Is he not violating the privacy of his customer?
Everyone now risks 10 years in jail and has to be wary when
- crossing international borders with a computer or cell phone
- developing photos at Wal-Mart and now
- having computers and cell phone repaired.
Reporting laws create suffering for adults and children
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Oregon Senate approved bill (to require computer technicians to re… » continues here »
Julie Carr performed oral sex with baby daughter: 17 years jail; filmed it: 20 years. Too harsh compared to 4 years for baby killer?
Posted by admin in Child Porn Witch Hunt on
Is our sex obsessed society punishing sexual child abuse too severely,
compared to serious bodily harm to children?
Julie Carr Performed oral sex with baby daughter: 17 years jail; filmed it: 20 years.
Compare: killing baby: 4 years; causing permanent brain damage: 2 years.
We will be attacked now with untrue accusations of "promoting child abuse". Which, of course, we are not doing. We don’t say Julie Carr should go unpunished.
Warning: not safe for children. Do not continue reading if you are easily offended.
We try to avoid explicit language, but even CNN uses some semi-explicit language
We are wondering what is less damaging to the infant:
- a mother licking baby in the wrong places. (17 years in jail) plus 10 years supervision plus life long sex offender registration
- physical abuse: violent shaking of an infant causing permanent life long brain damage (2 years jail). Or killing infant (4-5 years in jail). No registration in murderous-nanny-registry to prevent future work as nanny.
No, we are not condoning either behavior. We don’t think it is normal, healthy behavior. Sorry for questioning conventional wisdom and asking taboo questions.
If we suggested killing Julie Carr vigilante style, to mete out a death sentence, or 4 life sentences without parole, that would be acceptable.
But suggesting to even think about lower sentencing for certain kinds of child sexual abuse, is a no-no. We have been warned that this would be dangerous. We hope we will not attract vigilante threats.
But, our sense of justice, our sense of scientific curiosity compels us to ask these questions: Are some licks in inappropriate places really warrant much longer jail terms then violent brain and spinal cord trauma? What kind and how much damage is being caused in the infant by mom licking in inappropriate places? No, we don’t promote or condone such behavior.
And how many other so called "child rapists’ did not do more then Julie Carr? (Did we mention that we don’t condone this behavior, but are opposed to misleadingly call fondling and licking "rape").
Woman sentenced after streaming sex abuse of daughter over webcam|CNN
[Julie] Carr used a webcam to deliver four live videos of herself performing oral sex on her youngest daughter, according to the documents. The videos were sent to Nicholas Wilde, then 19, in West Midlands, England, whom Carr had met on an internet dating site, the documents said.
Woman sentenced after streaming sex abuse of daughter over webcam|CNN
We were surprised that the crime was labeled correctly:
"oral sex on an infant" and and not the usual "rape of infant".
In case you don’t know, any sexual activity, like kissing or fondling with a minor is defined as "rape". Probably it would sound too weird and incredible to write "Mother raped infant daughter". If it were perpetrated by a man, certainly the headline would read "Man raped his infant daughter". And everyone would imagine the guy having committed more atrocious acts then licking a baby’s privates. (No, we don’t approve of this!)
Compare this headline: Former Army Major Daniel Woolverton Sentenced For Raping Baby. Whereupon Human-Stupidity provokingly asked "What kind of rape"? (No, we don’t condone Woolverton’s behavior).
We did not want to be sexually explicit, so we refrained from the graphic terminology CNN used in this case here. But we suspect Woolverton probably engaged in similar activities as mother Julie Carr, like oral sex and manual indecent touching. In Woolverton’s case, we can not know, due to modern misleading language definitions of rape.
We will be crucified for this. People will falsely accuse us of condoning sexual abuse of children. We do not condone Woolverton’s or Julie Carr’s behavior..
Rather our message is 2 fold
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Julie Carr performed oral sex with baby daughter: 17 years jail; f… » continues here »
Former Army Major Daniel Woolverton Sentenced For Raping Baby. What kind of rape?
Posted by admin in Manipulative Language, Teenage Sexuality on
|
A former Army Major from our area was sentenced to 27 years in federal prison for a horrific crime: raping a baby. Federal authorities found 30,000 images and 100 videos of child pornography on the computer of 35 year-old Daniel Woolverton. Daniel Woolverton was a 1997 West Point graduate, with a career as an Army trial lawyer that appeared to be on the fast track. Now, hes behind bars after raping a boy as young as three months old, an act he videotaped. "Well, its repulsive," said an Arlington neighbor. "Raping an infant? Oh boy. Thats terrible," said another. wusa9.com/news/ |
Video from wusa9.com/news/ |
Raping a 3 month old infant! We found this terrible, too. So terrible that we consulted a medical doctor to inquire about the consequences of forcible penetrative rape of an infant. He confirmed our suspicion: The absolute mismatch in size would cause extreme, grave, life threatening injuries in an immature infant. So, how come, there is no mention of such grave injury?
We remembered Definition of "Rape": When a "Rape" is not a Rape! The Abuse of the word "Rape": indecent touching of a minor is "rape". It is absolutely impossible for us to know what kind of activities Daniel Wolverton engaged in Our language lost its precision and its power. The new "rape" definition serves purely to mislead the public as to the nature of the crime. To incite the mob.
Isn’t the truth enough? Most likely he did indecent touching and fumbling with an infant. Yes fumbling in places and ways he should not fumble. But it seems he did not engage in activities that would permanently hurt, mutilate and hospitalize the child.
Compare: Woman causes permanent brain damage in infant: 2 years. Kills baby: 4 years.)
Aren’t we insensitive? Defending a infant rapist? No, we don’t say what he did was right and defensible. We just say we should not mislead the public as to what he did. One thing is for sure. Thanks to the new definition of "rape", we can not know what he did.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Former Army Major Daniel Woolverton Sentenced For Raping Baby. Wha… » continues here »
Woman causes permanent brain damage in infant: 2 years. Kills baby: 4 years. Man possesses photos: priceless (40 years)
Posted by admin in Child Porn Witch Hunt, Men's Rights & Feminism on
- Greenburgh nanny sentenced for shaking baby [...] two years in state prison and three years of post release supervision on her July 2008 guilty plea to reckless assault on a child in the first degree. [...] As a result of the violent shaking, the baby suffered a subdural hematoma and diffuse rental hemorrhages, injuries that can lead to numerous, potential lifelong developmental challenges.
Nanny sentenced to five years for shaking toddler to death- Nanny Gets Four Years For Shaking Baby: severity of the injuries included multiple skull fractures and massive brain hemorrhages.
- New Study Finds That Many People Guilty of Child Abuse Get “Off the Hook” in Court | Shaken Baby Syndrome Attorney
- A woman knowingly drinks lots of alcohol when pregnant, and thus culpably giving birth to a permanently disfigured and mentally retarded child. Verdict: No crime, no jail
Compare this to
- Independence, MO —Two local men are going to federal prison on child pornography convictions. Both were sentenced Tuesday. Martin A. Cordry, 48, of Sugar Creek was sentenced to 40 years in prison without parole.
- A trucker arrested in Flagstaff for possession and transportation of child pornography has been sentenced to more than 11 years in federal prison. Prosecutors say 61-year-old Richard Self was convicted last November on three counts of transportation of child pornography and three counts of possession of child pornography. The Arizona Daily Sun says Self was sentenced Monday to a 135-month term
- Travis Matthew, 26, pleaded guilty last September to receiving child pornography and was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison.
- The former music minister at St. Eugene Catholic Church in Asheville was sentenced to 28 years in prison, followed by a lifetime of supervised release in connection with a child pornography charge. [...] guilty plea to a single criminal count of production of child pornography,
- More examples: child porn witch hunt
Is there gender bias? Obsessive punishment for sexual deviations?
Jailed for possession of video of himself masturbating when he was 12. Another victim of child porn laws faces minimum 2 year jail
Posted by admin in Child Porn Witch Hunt on
A young man got arrested for possession of child porn, depicting a 12 year boy old masturbating. It is his own video: he recorded himself when he was 12 years old. Mandatory minimum jail sentence: 2 years.
Think hard: maybe you took some indecent photos of yourself. Or your family album contains nunde photos mom took when you were a toddler. Burn your childhood pictures while you still are out of jail!
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Jailed for possession of video of himself masturbating when he was… » continues here »
Legalizing Child Pornography reduces child sex abuse crimes (Scientific study by Dr. Milton Diamond, U. Hawaii)
Posted by admin in Child Porn Witch Hunt on
Legalizing child pornography
is linked to lower rates of child sex abuse
Study carried out in Czech Republic confirms similar results in Japan and Denmark
Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA), that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography. And most significantly, the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen considerably since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible – a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan. Their findings are published online today in Springer’s journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.
The findings support the theory that potential sexual offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex crimes against children. While the authors do not approve of the use of real children in the production or distribution of child pornography, they say that artificially produced materials might serve a purpose.
Diamond M et al (2010). Pornography and sex crimes in the Czech Republic. Archives of Sexual Behavior. DOI 10.1007/s10508-010-9696-y eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-11/s-lcp113010.php
Video (must see)
Hawaii Researcher Studies Effects Of Child Pornography.:Says Porn Lowers Sex Abuse Of Children. (must see Video)As part of his research Diamond also looked at countries that have recently made child pornography illegal and said the rate of child sex abuse there is rising.
Original Paper: Pornography and Sex Crimes in the Czech Republic (HTML)
Original Paper: Pornography and Sex Crimes in the Czech Republic (PDF)
The findings support the theory that potential sexual offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex crimes against children.
Source: Legalizing child pornography is linked to lower rates of child sex abuse
Amazingly a politically incorrect study made it past the radar and actually got published. We are against dogmatic Human-Stupidity. We favor unbiased free research to find the truth. Human-Stupidity.com is in no way devoted to the goal of defending child pornography for its own sake. BUT
We are apalled that our sex-obsessed judicial system destroys the lives of harmless men |
|
while at the same time being tolerant of real mayhem, violence, vigilanteism, and the child obesity pandemic |
It is perfectly legal to own, produce and distribute clearly more dangerous depictions of
All these are perfectly legal, no matter if this might incite people to imitate and do likewise. And no matter if minors got maimed and killed in production of the video. |
Of course, only human-stupidity.com would dare to publish such a scientific result without backpedalling. The mainstream press, scared of the child porn witch hunt climate, has the compulsion to add caveats.
Charity’s anger at proposal to make child porn legal ‘to protect children from abusers’ (Daily Mail)
The proposal, by Professor Milton Diamond from the University of Hawaii [to legalise child pornography in a bid to cut the number of child sex abuse cases], follows a study which shows that child sex crimes fell when child pornography was legalised in the Czech Republic. [...] The research found that child sex crimes fell when child pornography was more easily accessible. The discovery tallies with similar studies in Denmark and Japan, where child pornography is not illegal, that found incidences of child sex abuse were lower in those countries.
The conclusion of the new study is that ‘artificially-produced’ child pornography should be made available to prevent real children being abused.
The normal press has to instantly counter academic research with the emotionally driven, manipulative unscientific drivel by charities and NGO’s.
But child protection charity NSPCC today said the idea was ‘wrong’.
Chris Cloke, the charity’s NSPCC head of child protection awareness, said: ‘This obscene type of material has no part to play in our society.
‘Many children suffer atrocious abuse in the making of indecent images.
‘To make it legal, would suggest that inappropriate behaviour and violence towards children is acceptable. It never is and it would be quite wrong to make it legal.’
Charity’s anger at proposal to make child porn legal ‘to protect children from abusers’ (Daily Mail)
Change.org sucks & censors had to instantly campaign emotions against science and actually won censorship (as was to be expected in the actual political child porn witch hunt climate):
Update: The University of Hawaii denounced this recommendation after receiving letters from 250 Change.org members. University of Hawaii Professor Recommends Legalizing Child Porn (Change.org)
Due to loud protest by change.org “human trafficing” campaigns, academic scientific research was censored with no need for scientific rebuttal by academic peer reviewed research.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Legalizing Child Pornography reduces child sex abuse crimes (Scien… » continues here »
Consult a lawyer before playing doctor. Perverse sex laws traumatize children.
Posted by Devils Advocate in Teenage Sexuality on
In these modern times, a child needs legal counsel before playing doctor, before taking photos, or before just hugging a fellow kid. Sex laws seriously traumatize and scar little children. 10y olds become registered sex offenders, 6 year olds accused of sexual harassment, and 13 year olds risk 10 years in jail for having a 12 year old boyfriend. Innocence of childhood is being taken away by pedo-hysteric perverts that invent and enforce absurd laws that grow out of the sex-obsessed religious mind.
A few decades ago, sexually curious children would get a little slap on the wrist or an admonition. Nowadays they get police arrest or at least a school suspension.
Obviously children need to be taught. and warned about these dangers. Not so much the dangers of sexuality. Children need to understand the dangers of man-made crazy laws.
But, how do you teach a 5 year old, or even a 12 year old that adults made insane laws that will cruelly punish him for taking nude photos of herself, playing doctor or “harassing” a kindergarden mate through hugging? Sexuality for children is even more complex then for adults
Get a lawyer before sex: 27 precautions before risking sex with a woman
You really need legal counsel if you are a minor, 16y, 13y, or 5 years old
There is no way a child or adolescent can live without a lawyer. The law mercilessly “protects” minors against exploitation, even by themselves.
If you are a minor, merely taking a photo of yourself naked is a legal nightmare (production of “child pornography”)
By this logic, if a child looks into the bath room mirror and sees her naked body, she is looking at child pornography!?
Every 5 year-old is stepping in a legal mine field if s/he wants to play doctor.
Criminalizing Child’s Play
by Marshall Burns, Ph.D. [...]What used to be called “playing doctor” for young children or thought of as normal sexual experimentation for older teens is now enough to get a kid arrested, taken away in handcuffs, put in juvenile jail, subjected to draconian psychological “treatment,” and put on a sex offender registry, often for the rest of his or her life! This is not just for aggressive or violent behavior, but for innocent, consensual play among giggling kids.
This report presents statistics on juvenile sex offenders, as well as details and references on 66 cases of the formal admonishment of children as young as four for behavior interpreted as sexual and criminal prosecution of children and teenagers for consensual sexual activity. This is a small sample of tens of thousands more cases like them across the United States and in some other countries.
Now every 7 year old, as soon as she is able to take a photo with a cell phone, needs to be accompanied by a lawyer, in order to know these important facts of life. Of course, these regulations need to be part of every school curriculum, from kindergarden to high school.
12, 14, 16 year olds, when engaging in sex, or just sex foreplay, are subject to varying laws, depending on country and state they are in. One of the most absurd cases is here
Do kids who are just “messing around” have to worry about these laws?
solresearch.org/~SOLR/QnA.asp?group=30#Ref_PlayDoctor
Yes, they do.
11-year-old registered “sex offender”
What used to be called “playing doctor” for young children or thought of as normal sexual experimentation for older teens is now enough to get a kid arrested, taken away in handcuffs, put in juvenile jail (or sometimes even adult prison), subjected to draconian psychological “treatment,” and put on a sex offender registry, often for the rest of his or her life! This is not just for aggressive or violent behavior, but also for innocent, consensual play among giggling kids. See the SOLR report, Criminalizing Child’s Play , for data on the formal admonishment of children as young as four, and criminal prosecution of first graders, for innocent sexual behavior.
10 year old girl registered as sex offender for 25 years. Her crime:
1) Fully clothed pretend-sex & 2) nude flashing
Another example of the disruption due to registration was described in Moore’s USA Today article (2006). Leah DuBuc, age twenty-two, and a resident of Michigan, was adjudicated
at the age of ten for sexual experimentation. DuBuc and her two stepbrothers age eight and five were caught flashing each other and pretending to have sex with their clothes on. Two years later DuBuc plead guilty to first and second degree sexual conduct and was sentenced to eighteen months in a residential treatment program and was required to register as sex offender for twenty-five years. DuBuc’s youthful mistake has made it difficult for her to find or keep a reasonable job; she suffers from community harassment, and has been refused financial aid, thus limiting her education level. DuBuc petitioned to be added to the non-public registry instead of the public registry but was denied because she was more than five years older than one victim at the time of the offense. DuBuc claimed the court had poor mathematical skills because her stepbrother was five and she was ten at the time of the offense cjcj.org/files/attitudes_towards.pdf
66 Cases of Persecuted Juvenile Sexual Activity
Brief descriptions of 66 cases of children and teenagers, from four to 19 years of age, who were either formally admonished by their schools or criminally prosecuted as a result of innocent or consensual sexual acts. Each case is documented by at least one reference to reputable news reports and/or court documents.
Read 66 cases of Persecuted Juvenile Sexual Activity
Today’s legally acceptable behavior can become a crime on kid’s birthday
Sex with 12 year old boy became a crime on her 17th birth day
1) A judge has sent a 17-year-old girl to a restorative justice conference before deciding if she should be punished for having sex with a 12-year-old boy.
In Napier District Court, Judge Tony Adeane observed the offence of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, instigated by the boy, happened on the girl’s 17th birthday, and had it been a day earlier she would not have been in the court.
nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10684597
In Brazil sex with 16 year old girlfriend became crime on his 18h birthday
2) In Brazil, where adolescents are so protected, that they (almost) get away with murder, a man was arrested on his 18th birthday. He was doing the same thing with his 16 year old girlfriend that he had done, legally, for years, while he was 17y or less. But now, on his 18th birthday, he became criminally liable for seducing a minor.
Avid readers of child sex abuse books clamor for punitive laws
We were blissfully unaware of the fact that there are many many books dedicated to child sexual abuse. Emotional women devour such child abuse literature and get in a frenzy, demanding stricter laws. Just looking at the titles and descriptions made us sick (child abuse true stories). People who are enamored with such child abuse literature demand action
Perverted law enforcement persecutes normal average childrenIt took me a while to believe that Angry Harry was right: people who make and enforce these “child protection” laws have morbid obsessive phantasies about child sex. Laws and law enforcement activities born out of these morbid phantasies do serious harm to little children and adolescents. These kids commit normal acts, sometimes somewhat “naughty” acts that then get blown out of proportion and criminalized instead of causing a simple admonition. |
thousands of women ‘therapists’, who fantasised about child sex for years on end, who badgered children as young as three with sexual thoughts and imagery, and who harmed tremendously thousands of children and families, are barely criticised, let alone imprisoned.How do they get away with this?
Well, one technique of theirs is to continue to make a huge fuss over child sexual abuse and to claim that they are thoroughly appalled by it. The truth, however, is likely to be very different. My guess is that they love it. Finally, I was shopping at ASDA (Wal-Mart) last week. They have a very small selection of books on sale. And I presume that they only sell those books that are in particularly high demand by the public. About 20% of the titles of the entire range were to do with ‘abuse’, and another 20% were to do with serial killers, murderers, torturers and, in general, ‘evil’ people. You know the type. angryharry.com/es_chris_langham.htm We at Human-Stupidity were shocked to find this HUGE amount of child abuse literature on Amazon.co.uk Books › “Child abuse”Related Searches: child abuse true stories. Showing 1 – 12 of 14,599 Results Why do people legally devour Child abuse books by Amazon and inadvertent possession of a picture is a heinous crime punishable by decades in jail? What about the children photographed on the cover of the child abuse books? |
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Consult a lawyer before playing doctor. Perverse sex laws traumati… » continues here »
Meredith Maran (My lie): False accusations due to “repressed-memory”-of-child-abuse witch hunt
Posted by Devils Advocate in Men's Rights & Feminism, Teenage Sexuality on
Meredith Maran’s recent book “My Lie” describes how Meredith accused her own father of child abuse and rape. She was fooled into this by then fashionable feminist witch hunt invention of “repressed memory”, that a third of all kids were sexually abused and just had forgotten. She is sorry for it, but does not quite see the monstrosity of how she almost destroyed her father’s life.
“I allow an innocent man to sit in prison if it meant keeping children safe”
(Meredith Maran)
In the middle of the book, while you are still deeply in the mind-set of being molested, there’s a notion you agree with that if one innocent man goes to prison, but it stops a hundred molesters, it’s worth it. Do you still agree with that notion?
I’m fairly close to a man still in prison, and really believe he is innocent. I know how he’s suffered. I know he’s 80 years old and in ill health. He’s spent 20 years in prison, for no reason. If every elementary school child is now taught how to protect themselves from sexual abuse — and even more to the point, some father or preschool teacher who feels the urge to molest a child will be inhibited from doing so because they think there are guys still in jail for doing that — but innocent people are in prison, do I have to make that choice? It is a Sophie’s choice kind of thing. Would I allow an innocent man to sit in prison if it meant keeping children safe?
So would you make that choice?
I think so.
Source of this monstrosity: salon.com/books/int/2010/09/20/meredith_maran_my_lie_interview/
Meredith Maran did not learn. She has a little pity for a guy whose life has been totally destroyed by 20 years of jail in spite of his innocence. No total outrage. No desire ti fight for justice (to make amends for her own injustice).
She still suffers from brainwashing by more recent feminist fables. Meredith Maran is sorry she destroyed her father’s life. But Meredith wants to totally destroy the life of a totally 100% innocent guys in order to save children from some indecent fondling? In this blog I make it a point that even the true culprit of indecent fondling of a (real) child deserves much lighter punishment then decades in jail. But Meredity wants that the totally innocent guy rots and gets raped in jail?
I use the word “real” child, denoting 3, 5 or 10 year old, because feminist laws
nowadays define 17 year olds as “children”
A child molestor is a guy who talks to children in creepy ways, who has indecent wandering hands. A guy who takes photos. An old grandpa who is getting a little too cozy. Or a 20 year old having sex with a 15 year old. Some reason for concern, yes. But feminist propaganda confounds senile grandpas with slight errors of judgment and violent penetrative toddler mutilators and (real) infant rapists.
I use the word “real” rapist, because all the above indecent behaviors
nowadays are officially called “rape”, causing total confusion.
• When a “Rape” is not a Rape! The Abuse of the word “Rape”. & the Perversion of Language
Child molestation might not be harmful!!?
Feminists either totally invent or vastly exaggerate the damage that is being done my low level child molestation. Where is the proof? Inconvenient science gets officially repressed and condemned:
So much that the entire US senate condemned a prestigious peer reviewed study by a 99-0 vote.
Scientific Publications Condemned and Repressed by US Congress and Senate




Recent Comments