Human logic evolved to win arguments, not to find the truth, scholars assert.

dont-listen-argumentOur brain evolved to win arguments, not to find the truth. In Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory,
Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber defend the argumentative theory of reasoning. They argue that human logic reasoning evolved to win arguments, not to discover the truth.

People Argue Just to Win, Scholars Assert.

Hugo Mercier is among the researchers now asserting that reason evolved to win arguments, not seek truth. […]

Rationality, by this yardstick (and irrationality too, but we’ll get to that) is nothing more or less than a servant of the hard-wired compulsion to triumph in the debating arena. According to this view, bias, lack of logic and other supposed flaws that pollute the stream of reason are instead social adaptations that enable one group to persuade (and defeat) another. Certitude works, however sharply it may depart from the truth. […]

“Reasoning doesn’t have this function of helping us to get better beliefs and make better decisions,” said Hugo Mercier, who is a co-author of the journal article, with Dan Sperber. “It was a purely social phenomenon. It evolved to help us convince others and to be careful when others try to convince us.” Truth and accuracy were beside the point.

Indeed, Mr. Sperber, a member of the Jean-Nicod research institute in Paris, first developed a version of the theory in 2000 to explain why evolution did not make the manifold flaws in reasoning go the way of the prehensile tail and the four-legged stride. Looking at a large body of psychological research, Mr. Sperber wanted to figure out why people persisted in picking out evidence that supported their views and ignored the rest — what is known as confirmation bias — leading them to hold on to a belief doggedly in the face of overwhelming contrary evidence.    Reason Seen More as Weapon Than Path to Truth | NY Times

Relevance for real world issues

argue2Human-Stupidity shares the frustrations of many activists, that logical reasoning and unassailable scientific proof are not enough to convert the believers in issues like men’s rights, race and iq, *evolution, political correctness, and drug war. 

We are awe-struck how manipulative language successfully distorts words like *consent, *child, *rape, distorts facts about prostitution. Feminists and religious zealots thus managed to take over the United Nations and enforce world wide law changes based on voodoo theories  and forged science, like sex trafficking and one in four myths. Harvard President Larry Summers was persecuted for questioning some feminist victimization theories. Human-Stupidity posits that women have evolved especially acute language manipulation skills to make up for their physical and economic disadvantages in the EEA. As a result, peer reviewed sound scientific studies get condemned by both the US senate and the US congress by unanimous vote (Rind Study).

Nobel prize winner James Watson had his reputation ruined for well-meaningly stating scientific truths, the same truth that earned renowned scientist J. Philippe Rushton constant persecution. *Discrimination is the explanation for every gender and race difference. We are awe struck how people in high academic positions can get away with drivel like race does not exist.

Don’t miss Robert Kurzban‘s book on the evolution of hypocrisy and meddling in other people’s sex life. Which explains, partially, why lying about a blow job (Bill Clinton) seems to be a worse transgression then starting a trillion dollar war based on lies about weapons of mass destruction (Bush)..

 

Original scholarly article

Mercier, Hugo and Sperber, Dan, Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory (June 26, 2010). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 57-74, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1698090 

Excerpts from Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory

Continue reading “Human logic evolved to win arguments, not to find the truth, scholars assert.”

Forced marriages: death threats victimize thousands of Muslim girls – German Government Study

439-forced-marriage-poster1Thousands of women, mostly underage, are forced into marriage in Germany every year. The German family minister Kristina Schröder (CDU) and the Integration official Maria Böhmer (CDU) announced they will present a study today, Nov. 9th.

The numbers derive from counting women that actively sought help at government counseling centers. We expect that there would not be many false complaints, but a large percentage of unreported cases.

In the year 2008, 3443 women sought help at counseling centers, because they were under the threat of forced marriage or actually forced to marry.

The casualty figures are much higher than previous estimates: The NGO Terre des Femmes was previously assumed, turn that in Germany every year more than a thousand women and girls from immigrant families go to counseling because of forced marriages.

For the new comprehensive study 1445 counseling centers were contacted. 830 of them reported back. The results also shed light on origin, age and history of the victims. Thus, every third person concerned in connection with the forced marriage is threatened with death. The vast majority of victims of forced marriages are from Muslim parents’ homes – 83.4 percent. According to the "Süddeutsche Zeitung" nearly two-thirds of the recorded cases are from families characterized as very religious.

Many have experienced extreme brutalityislam-vs-women_64

Almost all concerned come from immigrant families, but a third of girls and women who were forced into a marriage were born in Germany [probably to immigrant families (human-stupidity]) according to the survey. 23 percent were born in Turkey.  Turkey was the most frequent country of origin, followed by Serbia, Kosovo, Montenegro and Iraq.
Thousands of migrants are forced into marriage every year (Google translation)

  • forced marriageWe recognize that this is a very serious issue of civil liberty that warrants attention.
    • Young women and girls being forced by their own family and their entire support network is an extreme threat. Please read the quotations and original articles below and on the picture links.
    • Human-Stupidity’s subsequent focus on unpopular and ignored side issues does not mean that we don’t recognize the seriousness of violently forced marriages.
  • we suspect for every reported case, there probably are huge numbers of cases where marriages happen just by mild parental pressure and nobody ever complaints.
    • Of course, this is very problematic, we do not support such action.
    • But in our traditional position as Devil’s advocate who wants to instigate out-of-the-box thinking, we could question if such marriages could not  be happy. Maybe parents’ mate choices are more mature then 17 year old girls’ choices?
    • Of course, we absolutely do not support death threats and severe physical violence. And we are aware that knowledge of this violence might scare many girls into voluntary compliance.
    • No, Human-Stupidity does NOT support forced marriages

  • we do miss any mention  of male victims of "shotgun marriages". We hope the final report will at least mention such cases. Otherwise this is likely to be another case where only women victims will be considered and men’s rights being ignored men-are-victims-of-forced-marriage-too
  • we are very afraid that, in the future, false accusations of forced marriages, without due process, might become rampant.
    • we fear that a woman can, 50 years after the wedding, accuse her husband of forced marriage, just to get out of an unhappy relationship. The victimized man would be jailed, without due process, due to the pervasive doctrine "women don’t lie".  While we believe that women nowadays don’t lie (well, rarely lie) about forced marriage, we expect such numbers to increase, once women get guaranteed benefits from false accusations (see the false rape society).
  • we expect opponents of large scale immigration to see this as a further failure of multi-culturalism 
  • Continue reading “Forced marriages: death threats victimize thousands of Muslim girls – German Government Study”

    Miss World 2011, appalling offense against women’s equality, reduces women to their parts.

    Beauty contests "reduce women to their parts" and are an "appalling offense against women’s equality".

    Another female privilege: Which men have the opportunity to get free travel and a million dollar prize, just for their looks?

    Miss-world-2011bMen don’t have such chances. Mr. Universe steroid freak show, and prize boxing both require talent, hard work and entail serious health risks.

    Getting beat to pulp in a boxing match (while women watch and cheer the winner) is not an appalling offense against men’s equality and does not reduce men to their parts?

    knockout

    We at Human-Stupidity never cease to wonder why such idiotic perverted logic by feminists and the politically correctness movement will be copied by serious newspapers and taught in women’s studies courses at serious colleges. Our friend the antifeminist would probably explain that the Miss Universe contest is an appalling offense against old ugly feminist’s equality.

    miss-world-feminisit-protest

     

     

     

     

    Woman who studied in a nunnery is crowned Miss World 2011|Daily Mail

    Miss Venezuela, 21, crowned Miss World in London

    LONDON A human resources graduate from Venezuela, whose ambition is to work with children, was crowned Miss World 2011 at a glittering beauty pageant in London on Sunday.
    Ivian Sarcos, 21, took the ultimate beauty accolade at Earls Court in London, the city where the first Miss World was staged in 1951.
    Outside the venue, a small feminist demonstration took place, protesting at what they said was an "appalling offence against women’s equality."
    The beauty contest was broadcast live to more than 150 countries and was watched by a billion viewers, organisers said.
    The competition has drawn criticism in recent years for being outdated and little more than a chance to look good in swimwear.
    But of the 122 contestants whom Sarcos beat, a quarter are graduates and more than half speak three or more languages.

    Continue reading “Miss World 2011, appalling offense against women’s equality, reduces women to their parts.”

    "Hot for Teacher", Paedogeddon: "Pedophilia" Comedy Videos

    Adolescent sexuality

    “To Catch a Predator” witch hunt by NBC Dateline & “Perverted Justice”” was a successful TV series. Chris Hansen enticed many people (overwhelmingly men) to meet with female and men teen “jail bait” and to get them violently arrested by Swat. To understand the irony of the following spoof you might want to first read “To Catch a Predator” witch hunt by NBC Dateline & “Perverted Justice””.

    To Catch a Predator — Hot for Teacher (Video)
    Chris Hansen “To catch a predator” spoof with 2 hot blonde teachers after a willing 14 year old boy

    Some men’s rights proponents (the antifeminist) would disagree here. They think women “sex offenders” like the ones above should not be cut any slack, if men in the same situation get humiliatingly arrested. We actually agree: Human Stupidity, in its 50 post series about Teenage Sexuality suggested to invert the double standard. Girls mature faster and thus need less protection from sex (if they need any protection at all). Ancient wisdom of the old knew this: all over the world, minimum marriage age for girls was lower then for boys.

    Don’t miss the YouTube Spoof of “Catch a Predator”: Absurdity of Underage Sex Entrapment, a hilarious spoof of a healthy male lusting after willing 17 year old pussy.

    Adult Child Sex

    Adult child sex is a very different issue. Like the following spoof, we take issue with modern pedo-hysteria. It is generally assumed that the average adult male is a danger to pre-pubescent children. We believe that the vast majority of normal males have no sexual interest whatsoever in pre-pubescent children.

    Pedophile hunters are more dangerous then most pedophiles (who might feel an attraction without the need of acting it out).

    Paedogeddon Video

    Adolescent sexuality

    "To Catch a Predator" witch hunt by NBC Dateline & "Perverted Justice"" was a successful TV series. Chris Hansen enticed many people (overwhelmingly men) to meet with female and men teen "jail bait" and to get them violently arrested by Swat. To understand the irony of the following spoof you might want to first read "To Catch a Predator" witch hunt by NBC Dateline & "Perverted Justice"".

    To Catch a Predator — Hot for Teacher (Video)
    Chris Hansen “To catch a predator” spoof with 2 hot blonde teachers after a willing 14 year old boy

    Some men’s rights proponents (the antifeminist) would disagree here. They think women "sex offenders" like the ones above should not be cut any slack, if men in the same situation get humiliatingly arrested. We actually agree: Human Stupidity, in its 50 post series about Teenage Sexuality suggested to invert the double standard. Girls mature faster and thus need less protection from sex (if they need any protection at all). Ancient wisdom of the old knew this: all over the world, minimum marriage age for girls was lower then for boys.

    Don’t miss the YouTube Spoof of "Catch a Predator": Absurdity of Underage Sex Entrapment, a hilarious spoof of a healthy male lusting after willing 17 year old pussy.

    Adult Child Sex

    Adult child sex is a very different issue. Like the following spoof, we take issue with modern pedo-hysteria. It is generally assumed that the average adult male is a danger to pre-pubescent children. We believe that the vast majority of normal males have no sexual interest whatsoever in pre-pubescent children.

    Pedophile hunters are more dangerous then most pedophiles (who might feel an attraction without the need of acting it out).

    Paedogeddon Video

    Adolescent sexuality

    "To Catch a Predator" witch hunt by NBC Dateline & "Perverted Justice"" was a successful TV series. Chris Hansen enticed many people (overwhelmingly men) to meet with female and men teen "jail bait" and to get them violently arrested by Swat. To understand the irony of the following spoof you might want to first read "To Catch a Predator" witch hunt by NBC Dateline & "Perverted Justice"".

    To Catch a Predator — Hot for Teacher (Video)
    Chris Hansen “To catch a predator” spoof with 2 hot blonde teachers after a willing 14 year old boy

    Some men’s rights proponents (the antifeminist) would disagree here. They think women "sex offenders" like the ones above should not be cut any slack, if men in the same situation get humiliatingly arrested. We actually agree: Human Stupidity, in its 50 post series about Teenage Sexuality suggested to invert the double standard. Girls mature faster and thus need less protection from sex (if they need any protection at all). Ancient wisdom of the old knew this: all over the world, minimum marriage age for girls was lower then for boys.

    Don’t miss the YouTube Spoof of "Catch a Predator": Absurdity of Underage Sex Entrapment, a hilarious spoof of a healthy male lusting after willing 17 year old pussy.

    Adult Child Sex

    Adult child sex is a very different issue. Like the following spoof, we take issue with modern pedo-hysteria. It is generally assumed that the average adult male is a danger to pre-pubescent children. We believe that the vast majority of normal males have no sexual interest whatsoever in pre-pubescent children.

    Pedophile hunters are more dangerous then most pedophiles (who might feel an attraction without the need of acting it out).

    Paedogeddon Video

    Continue reading “"Hot for Teacher", Paedogeddon: "Pedophilia" Comedy Videos”

    Trophies of feminism: 10 powerful men marred and destroyed by women’s allegations.

    Unproven, or even false accusations of a single woman can destroy the world’s most powerful men and change the course of world  history. Feminism has given enormous power to any woman to derail the most powerful men in the world.

    • Al Gore, Nobel prize winner (peace) and ex-Vice-President of the USA, falsely accused of rape
    • Julian Assange, (of Wikileaks fame) accused by feminists of broken condom "rape". The entire might of the USA could not derail him, but 2 women could get him imprisoned.
    • Dominique Strauss-Kahn, IMF chief and French Presidential Candidate lost the leadership of the International Monetary Fund and likely the presidency of France. His arrest caused an instant decline of the Euro. Hedge funds could have made billions overnight. His successor at the IMF has a very different policy regarding the Euro bailout which potentially involves more then a Trillion (one million million) Euros. The future of the Euro, the currencies of entire nations probably were changed by the accusation of a habitual liar who already had lied about prior rapes
    • Oscar Pistorius, paralympic world record holder in 100, 200 and 400-metre events: "South Africa’s legless Blade Runner has been charged with assault after a woman claimed he bruised her leg at a party. Double amputee Oscar Pistorius spent Saturday night in jail after being accused of assaulting the 19-year-old woman". The charges were soon dropped..
    • Franco Porzio, Olympic champion in Water Polo, was accused by his second wife. His first wife came to his defense.
    • Jörg Kachelmann, Germany’s prominent famous TV weatherman spent months in jail upon the mere unproven accusation of an ex-girlfriend. He remained in jail even after she had been caught with various lies.
    • Theo Theophanous,an Australian Labor minister, lost his high government job, his reputation and much of his savings. His accuser had waited for 10 years and was shown to be notoriously unreliable. But the character assassination had already taken its toll.
    • Moshe Katsav, ex president of Israel, got a 7 plus 2 year prison sentence, because "The judges said they found the rape victim’s testimony “completely credible” and Mr. Katsav’s “false.” [NYT] Time [H]. As usual, accusations were not leveled immediately after the alleged crime, when it was still possible to find proof.
      • We can not affirm that Katzav is innocent. But like Strauss-Kahn, it looks that he is a powerful womanizer but not necessarily a rapist
      • If he really forcibly raped the woman, he deserves the jail time. Even more so because then he was incredibly stupid.
        • a) Rich powerful men have so many options to get sex with admirers (groupies) or affordable prostitutes.
        • b) And if he was really guilty , why would he be so incredibly stupid to renege on a plea bargain that would have saved him prison time?
    • Mel Gibson,Hollywood actor,  accused by his girl friend and defended by his ex-wife
    • Brazilian President with panty-less woman 1994Bill Clinton, US  president.  whose presidency was marred by the Paula Jones harassment accusations.
      • So what if he really made some indecent proposal to Paula Jones?  Weakness as a weapon: The Sexual Harassment Industry makes a point that maybe women should be empowered to withstand innuendo, cat calls, objectifying gaze.
      • The Paula Jones case led to the inquiries into Clinton’s private sex live, which led to the Lewinsky scandal. It was unfortunate that he lied, but most men and women lie about love affairs, and it should not have been anyone’s business who he has sex (or blow jobs) with
      • Monica Lewinsky rarely gets credited for having stood by her man and tried her best to protect Bill Clinton.
      • Sexually more liberated Brazilians could not understand why Clinton suffered so much harassment.
      • Brazilians also could not understand why the most powerful man on earth could not score a more attractive girl friend then Monica Lewinsky.
      • Long gone were the times, where the most powerful man on earth (John F. Kennedy) could have a secret tryst  with the most desired woman on earth (Marilyn Monroe) 1 2 3 ABC
      • In Brazil there was a minor scandal when the country’s president was photographed with a carnival princess and Playboy Cover who had no panties on. "An adorable girl," the President dreamily mused to reporters a couple of days later.  … Later "the Globo television network broadcast a recording of the President cooing, "I am in love with you," to Miss Ramos over the telephone"itamar_lilia_calcinha
    • Christian von Boetticher, 40, designated leader of the conservative Christian Democratic Union in Schleswig-Holstein,  who was set to lead Chancellor Angela Merkel’s party in its fight to retain power the north German state next May, has resigned after intense internal party pressure over his consensual and perfectly legal love affair with a 16-year-old girl. The girl did not even accuse him.
    • The 20 Most Scandalous Sexual-Harassment Cases of All Time

     

    Parts of this article were translated from the Italian I trofei di caccia del femminismo: le teste dei maschi infangati o distrutti da accuse di Donne.

    "Tanning bed pervert" nailed for kiddie porn production. Decades in prison for secretly watching and filming?

    A peeping Tom rigged a tanning bed so (female) adults and children alike could be watched and filmed by him. This is bad taste, and quite common. He deserves a lesson. He probably needs some therapy.  From the story below, it seems they don’t even prosecute him for peeping and filming adults. For that transgression he probably would receive a deserved and measured punishment.

    The punishment for violating the privacy of adults is negligible compared to the draconian child porn prison terms he faces. For peeping and filming minors, he is likely to suffer enormous and disproportional punishment. Decades for each count of child pornography "production" could add up to a century.

    peeping-tomThe victims did not even notice they were filmed. So they did not suffer great harm (except for the Voodoo theory of child porn victimization).  No, I am not saying that there should be no punishment.

    But does it make sense to punish him as strictly as for child kidnapping for ransom?

    • Do you prefer your child to be secretly watched and filmed by a shy immature pervert or be kidnapped?
    • Don’t you prefer your kid to be secretly filmed on the tanning bed 100 times, then to suffer one single instance of kidnapping?  I would be more concerned about the cancer risk from 100 tannings.

    Wouldn’t you rather have your kid secretly filmed on a tanning bed then to fall victim to any of the following

    • The neighborhood gang extorting an adolescent’s or child’s lunch money
    • School bullies sticking a kid’s head in the toilet or beating the child (even if only lightly)
    • Drunk drivers running over children on the street
    • Bicycle robbers that dangerously push children off bicycles
    • Dog owners that don’t keep their dogs leashed, locked, muzzled and thus get children bitten?
    • A flash mob roaming the neighborhood, setting ablaze buildings

    All the above crimes carry much lower penalties.  So why does our perverted filming peeping Tom get so much higher penalties then those who truly endanger and traumatize our children?

    This peeping Tom erred, committed a puerile immature mistake. Unlike many other victims of the child pornography witch hunt that are totally innocent

    This peeping Tom is an example of compulsive people who might be helped to refrain from acting out their urges with real children, if they had easier access to legal child "pornography": depictions of harmless photos and videos of adolescents in tanning beds.

    We can not know if he was interested in actual true children because we invented manipulative language to confuse on purpose, confuse adolescents with children

     

    "Tanning bed pervert" nailed for kiddie porn production

    Doyce Dean Griffis of Starke, FL, is charged with seven counts of production of child pornography, two counts of receiving child pornography, and one count of possession of child pornography.

    Continue reading “"Tanning bed pervert" nailed for kiddie porn production. Decades in prison for secretly watching and filming?”

    Why the moral outrage about 51y actor Doug Hutchinson’s marriage to Courtney Alexis Stodden (16)

     51y actor Doug Hutchinson's marriage to Courtney Alexis Stodden (16)51 year old actor Doug Hutchinson marries 16 year-old Courtney Alexis Stodden, with her mother’s consent. In the videos you can see a harmonious loving couple. But, all hell breaks loose. Doug is a creepy pervert, Alexis Stodden is a poor victim (or a whore) and her mother is a pimp.  Had Doug not gotten legal advice, he would have fallen prey to immense complexity of laws regarding adolescent sexuality and would be in prison as a child rapist as a punishment for his love affair.

    Creepy Actor’s Creepy Marriage Should Be Illegal

    Here’s the deal — Hutchison is 51 years old, and his new bride Courtney Alexis Stodden is a mere 16 years old!!! That’s right. She’s just a child and yet their "consensual" marriage to one another is as legal as they come apparently, thanks to none other than Courtney’s own mother!

    Way to be a pervy creep and ruin a young girl’s life, Hutchison! Way to look out for your daughter, Moms! Is anyone sane in this really freakish situation?

    How do people know that a happy marriage with a mature loving men will ruin a girl’s life? Nowadays, Romeo and Juliet would both be arrested, and the "Blue Lagoon" heroes (t least the boy) would be jailed after their return to "civilization".

    Her parents should have been arrested for letting a 51 year old PERVERT MOLEST their MINOR CHILD! Because mo matter how "old" she looks, she is just that…a child! For them to marry means that at some time he was putting the "moves" on her, or even dating her! That is ILLEGAL in most states here! GAG! I JUST THREW UP IN MY MOUTH AT THE THOUGHT! YouTube commentator

    Evolutionary psychologist explains

    Evolutionary psychologist Robert Kurzban explains the human propensity to meddle in other people’s private lives, to outlaw victimless sex "crimes"

    1. FIRST comes an inner moral feeling (which usually serves to increase one’s own reproductive fitness).
    2. THEN, after the fact,we find some logical reasoning to justify our moral feelings. We invent victims even if there are none

    Kurzban explains how, in a small community, everyone gains reproductive advantage by restricting other people’s sexual liberty.

     

    Doug Hutchinson and wife Courtney Stodden in the News

    Finding victims where there are none

    In the above YouTube video, we see a happy couple with conservative attitudes about virgin marriage. Cruel, anti-teenage sexuality age-of-consent laws frequently destroy such a love affair with cruelty

    Thousands of men, and a few women men have their life destroyed in similar situations. A unholy union of religious conservatives and repressive feminists decide, against Álexis’ will, that she is a poor victim. That adolescent Alexis Stoddenis a child [17] that can not consent* to sex. But in some jurisdiction she magically has maturity to consent to sex with boys of similar age, while in other states 2 adolescents are raping each other when engaging in consensual sex. Systematic language manipulation changes the meamings of words like rape*, consent*, child*, pedophile* etc. Our language has been distorted so much, that: had Doug fondled her, before marriage, with full consent, he might have as well raped her forcibly, it would be the same. The same punishment, and the same press reports ("Actor sentenced for raping child"). Doug Hutchinson was wise enough to avoid this, but thousands of men languish in jail for consensual sex with adolescent "children". The Antifeminist has feminism-is-sexual-trade-union-theory to explain such institutionalized cruel interference in private bedroom affairs.

     

    ‘Green Mile’ Actor Doug Hutchison, 51, Marries Aspiring Singer, 16

    "We’re aware that our vast age difference is extremely controversial," the couple said in a statement released by their spokesperson. "But we’re very much in love and want to get the message out there that true love can be ageless."
    According to the Clark County, Nevada Marriage Bureau, both marriage license applicants must be at least 18 years of age. But minors (below the age of 18) are able to obtain a license with the consent of a parent or legal guardian — reasoning that at least one of Stodden’s parents approves of their daughter’s May-December marriage.
    Hutchison’s young wife is a former beauty pageant queen and hopes to become the next big thing out of Nashville. Marrying a much older D-list actor is certainly one way to do it — although the couple insists that their union is based purely on genuine love.

    We wish the happy Courtney Alexis Stodden and Doug Hutchinson good luck in their planned reality TV show

    YouTube Video

    Actor Doug Hutchinson marries 16 year old Courtney Stodden

     

    Continue reading “Why the moral outrage about 51y actor Doug Hutchinson’s marriage to Courtney Alexis Stodden (16)”

    Child porn laws victimize children and adults.

    Irrational absurd child pornography laws

    • victimize children by making them sex criminals for taking, passing on or possessing harmless photos of themselves
    • put a large percentage of children at risk (those who possess so called child porn but are lucky not to be prosecuted)
    • victimize children by increasing actual sex crimes against children (Professor Milton Diamond). Some dangerous pedophiles end up abusing real children because they have no legal outlet perusing pictures.
    • victimize adults that inadvertently possess child pornography. Almost any computer has one potential child porn photo somewhere in a computer cache, recycle bin or spam email. Or in legally downloaded over-18 porn where the actress turned out to be a minor with a true valid government ID that “proved” she was over 18
    • victimize adults that, by sexual orientation, seek child pornography. The prohibition takes away the chance to use a harmless outlet, in the privacy of their home, that does not harm real live children. In the US, possession of photos carries higher penalties then actual forcible child abuse.

    The discussion is further complicated by manipulative language that intentionally confounds children and adolescents, confounds  erotica and explicit pornography.  We will elaborate further below.


    30 percent of 17-year-olds with cell phones report receiving sexually-explicit texts

    In other words, 30% of our adolescents are committing felonies and are at risk of getting victimized by law enforcement and court prosecutors. They are at risk to become registered sex offenders.

    A 13-year-old girl and a 12-year-old boy from Valparaiso have been charged with possession of child pornography and child exploitation after it was discovered they were using their cell phones to exchange nude pictures of themselves with each other.

    sexting2222So the children are exploiting themselves. And photographing oneself is a heinous felony.

    Maybe children should go to prison for looking at themselves in the mirror when nude. Obviously, what they see in the mirror is child pornography.

    Actually, nude children themselves are child pornography. Children see children nude all the time, but they cannot photograph them. It is probably hard for them to fathom that a photo of what they see all the time is a terrible thing,  punishable with higher prison sentences then actual child beating , mutilation and child killing. The reason for this distorted logic is hard to understand. [1] [2]

    Adult laws are crazy and insane, and thus hard to explain to reasonable children.

    The “sexting” case is being dealt with in Indiana’s juvenile court system. In adult court, they could have faced 11 years in prison and been forced to register as sex offenders.

    11 years in prison for photographing oneself. Pure insanity. If they inadvertently keep the photos it still can happen when they grow up [2]

    Porter County Deputy Prosecutor Cheryl Polark told the Northwest Indiana Times that young people don’t understand the ramifications of texting nude pictures or posting certain material on social networking sites like Facebook. She said a nude picture could end up being shared with half the school and could get in the hands of people who seek out child pornography.

    embarrassing nose-picking photo. Might haunt the kid once he becomes president or senatorIt is somewhat embarrassing if the photos get distributed all over school. But there are so many other embarrassing things in life that might end up on the internet. Photos of picking one’s nose, for example.

    But what if they end up in the hands of people who seek out child pornography? Great! So these people could get child pornography that was produced without harming children!  And if they live far away, then even the anonymity of the children is preserved.

    Child pornography reduces sex crimes

    Don’t forget, as Dr. Milton Diamond proved very clearly, that free access to child porn reduces sex crimes against children. The explanation for this is that a pedophile can masturbate to the child porn and thus diminishes his sexual urge and the need to seek live children.

    Of course, “watching child porn victimizes the child”, according to the Voodoo science of child pornography laws”. Again, we can not understand how a child gets victimized if someone secretly looks at their photos, 1000s of miles away, in the privacy of his home. Child pornography laws are simply irrational witch hunt.

    We fail to protect children from serious life threatening damage, be it fetal alcohol syndrome or child food porn that kills millions prematurely.

    Make war, not love

    Continue reading “Child porn laws victimize children and adults.”