Category: Men’s Rights & Feminism

False rape accusers are "victims" in need for protection and anonymity

Feminist and PC (political correctness) language abuse have no bounds: a false rape accuser is a "victim", often her face is still pixelated in photos, to protect her victim identity.

Rarely is it said that she is the lying perjuring aggressor, who wreaked havoc on the life of an innocent falsely accused man, and wasted  police time pursuing a false  crime report. Of course, by feminist creed, women are never to blame for their crimes and misdeeds.

Campus activists say their university perpetuated ‘victim blaming’ because of the way it handled — a false rape claim:

Campus activists say their university perpetuated ‘victim blaming’ because of the way it handled — a false rape   claim

We pause to allow you to do a double-take. The president of the Feminist Action League is upset because a crime alert regarding a false sexual assault put emphasis on "something other than the attack."  Um, there was no attack. And note that the president of the Feminist Action League is not upset because a crime alert was issued over a false sexual assault claim.

It is typical for political correctness and lying feminist theory that facts don’t count. The woman is a victim, always, no exception. If she is a murderess, she is a victim and suffers from battered woman syndrome. If she made a false rape report, the man can learn from the experience of being in jail and getting threatened and possibly raped by hard core criminal inmates.

The school newspaper has written an article using the false report to help raise awareness about . . . sexual assault.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “False rape accusers are "victims" in need for protection and anonymity” »
False rape accusers are "victims" in need for protection…
» continues here »

EU to ban anti-feminist, racist, homophobic speech – urge former heads of state

 

Sophia Kuby, spokesman for European Dignity Watch, said the Framework betrays the essentially totalitarian mindset of significant elements within the European Union’s apparatus. The document, if adopted by the European Parliament, she said, “could lead to situations in which vague or unwarranted accusations are leveled against individuals and groups.”
Former heads of state call on EU to set up state surveillance of ‘intolerant’ citizens 

  • EU to ban anti-feminist, racist, homophobic speech
  • UN demands Germany repress free Speech.

    •  

    Thanks to avoiceformen for calling attention to

     Former heads of state urge EU to outlaw anti-feminism

     

    Take concrete action to combat intolerance, in particular with a view to eliminating racism,  colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia. 4

    Political correctness dominates the United Nations and the European Union.  Hate speech laws went down the slippery slope from outlawing incitement of violence and lynching to hampering discussion and even academic research about race and iq, domestic violence, wage gap, immigration law.

     

    A prime example: it must be understood that demonstrations (in  exercise of freedom of assembly) need not be tolerated when they are likely to  degenerate into riots or infringe on the rights of others 4

    Unfortunately, this includes peaceful demonstrators that will create violent backlash counter-demonstrations. We are sure this will not be interpreted that Trayvon Martin or other Black rioters will be prevented from demonstrating. Not will violent feminists be constrained, but non-violent anti-feminists. After all, anti-feminists are criminalized by this law.

    Example s: tolerance does not denote acceptance of such practices as female circumcision,

    male circumcision is not only ok but required due to to mandatory tolerance for millennia-old religious mutilation in Jewish and Muslim holy rites

    forced marriage, polygamy

    polyandry is ok? And what is so terrible about polygamy that it needs to be outlawed at all costs and can not be left to local governments? Of course, the Muslims will oppose this

    or any form of exploitation or domination of women

    note that men can be exploited and dominated. For example by women and their family courts that reduce men to slave labor to provide life long comfortable income to women

    This text was prepared under the aegis of the European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation by a Group of Experts composed of Yoram Dinstein (Chair), Ugo Genesio, Rein Mȕllerson, Daniel Thȕrer and Rȕdiger Wolfrum  4

    We at Human-Stupidity bemoan that Men’s Right’s Activists and Race Realists do not embrace each other and see that they face the same problems:   Gender Quotas, Race Quotas, "reverse discrimination", Hate Speech Laws, and systematic privileges for women, colored races, immigrants and non-native religions.

    Canada’s Universities repress discussion of Men’s Rights issues

     

    The Canadian Federation of Students (CFS) is the largest student organization in Canada, and the national coordinating body that oversees most of the Canadian student unions. There is no U.S. equivalent. In 2013, the CFS passed a resolution that prohibited either men’s issues or men’s rights groups or clubs on their affiliated Canadian campuses.  

    Discussing false rape [2] accusations, academic research about female domestic violence, suicide, shorter male life span, family court injustice, all that is illegal on Canadian Campuses

    University campuses are in the service of feminist indoctrination. There are un- and antiscientific women studies courses, with absolutely nothing about men’s problems.

    The real-life consequences? First, this Fall, your son or daughter is unlikely to even discover the option of these clubs—and therefore their ideas–because they will not be able to recruit students by setting up a recruiting table on campus. (Such clubs exist in only one major U.S. university—Montana State at Bozeman.) Second, if he or she does find one, it is likely to be ineffective because it cannot receive student activities fees to help fund its activities; and third, their club would receive no support in the promotion of its activities (e.g., creating posters). The cumulative effect? Your son would experience the group’s lack of legitimacy. Especially in your son or daughter’s first year, lack of legitimacy can be a potent force. [Universities’ Love-Hate Relationship with Men]

    Lack of legitimacy, and total lack of funding and support are a serious problem.  Much worse is the legal terror of fines and imprisonment for non-violent speech of truth.

    Hate speech laws have become instruments of terror to silence legitimate non-violent discussion. We are back to the medieval times of Galileo Galilee: doubting political correctness or opposing feminist drivel is a punishable offense.

    While men must not even speak, women, and feminists can aggress with impunity.

    Even extreme violence, like Lorena Bobbitt is usually excused with battered woman syndrome.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Canada’s Universities repress discussion of Men’s Rights issues” »
    Canada’s Universities repress discussion of Men’s Righ…
    » continues here »

    Impunity for violent criminal feminists, MRA charged $ 964 police protection fee at U of Toronto

    Men’s Rights Activists (MRA) have to pay $ 964 "security fee" for police protection against feminists who engage in criminal mischief to crash MRA events

    the Canadian Association for Equality has learned that the administration will force a mandatory $964 security fee on our allied campus group to cover costs of police they have deemed necessary next Friday. This means the event “Caring About University Men: Why We Need Campus Men’s Centres in a Time of Crisis, with Miles Groth” is currently in serious jeopardy.

    This is the culmination of Political Correctness Hate Speech Laws.  While speech can not be repressed with hate speech law, make it impossibly expensive. Blame the victim of violent demonstration,, make them pay for their right to free speech.

    The politically correct interpretation is different. Hate speech by the privileged patriarchy does not deserve free speech rights.

    .MRA, part of the patriarchy, are offensive to feminists, who represent the historically disadvantaged group "women".  So it is the MRA’s fault if the offended women feel compelled to act against them, blocking entrances, pushing, shoving, spitting at police. Or they feel compelled to even pull fire-alarms, in their justified despair and frustration about the offensive event /sarcasm

    "… therefore we should not be allowed to speak, and that, from their perspective is not an abridgement of freedom of speech, it is rather the prevention of hate speech." -Warren Farrell

     

    Janice FIamengo: What’s Wrong With Women’s Studies? A CAFE Event by EqualityCanadaTV

     

    Human-Stupidity Analysis

    Not only does Political correctness brainwash children and adolescents in school and University, adults through press indoctrination. Political correctness now actively shuts down all critical speech by outlawing it. This is enforced top-down,by international organizations.

    We are appalled and shocked. Freedom of speech has been the hallmark of most Western constitutions and liberties. Political correctness has restricted such freedom in colleges, at the work place. But to make this official policy of 28 countries, is unimaginable. EU to ban anti-feminist, racist, homophobic speech The United Nations also is very active in such subject matters. UN demands Germany repress free Speech.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Impunity for violent criminal feminists, MRA charged $ 964 police protection fee at U of Toronto” »
    Impunity for violent criminal feminists, MRA charged $ 964 police …
    » continues here »

    EU to ban anti-feminist, racist, homophobic speech

    EU to ban anti-feminist speech

    • and ban any "defamatory comments" of the following kind.

    racism, colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia

     

    • Governments MUST  "Take concrete action to combat intolerance, in particular with a view to eliminating racism, colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia."
    • Governments MUST give special privileges to underprivileged genders, races, sexual orientations, etc.:  "The special protection afforded to members of vulnerable and disadvantaged groups may imply a preferential treatment. Strictly speaking, this preferential treatment goes beyond mere respect and acceptance lying at the root of tolerance "

    The texts quoted and highlighted above are from the EU (Europan Union) document itself. I kid you not.

     

    We at Human-Stupidity bemoan that Men’s Right’s Activists and Race Realists do not embrace each other and see that they face the same problems:   Gender Quotas, Race Quotas, "reverse discrimination", Hate Speech Laws, and systematic privileges for women, colored races, immigrants and non-native religions. 

    EU to ban anti-feminist speech continues >>

    The EU’s latest document is a called: “The European framework national statute for the promotion of tolerance”[4] which is a document elaborated with a view to being enacted by the legislatures of all the 28 unfortunate nations that are members of this club.

    What’s wrong with “promotion of tolerance” one might ask. As you will see in the following lines, “promotion of tolerance” means something entirely different than what it means to reasonable people. And basically the entire document looks more like a statue of the Thought Police and the Ministry of Truth.

    In the Section 1 of the document, the EU defines its terms. So terms like “hate crime”, “group” and “tolerance” are being introduced. Of particular interest is the EU’s definition of “group libel”[5]:

    “Group libel” means: defamatory comments made in public and aimed against a group as defined in paragraph (a) – or members thereof – with a view to inciting to violence, slandering the group, holding it to ridicule or subjecting it to false charges.

    As we will soon see, feminists are also de facto part of the “group” notion – so holding feminists to ridicule, as they deserve, will now be a crime.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “EU to ban anti-feminist, racist, homophobic speech” »
    EU to ban anti-feminist, racist, homophobic speech
    » continues here »

    Same prize money for half the time of weaker play. "Equality" at Wimbledon’s final.

    Marion Bartoli won the women’s final after 81 minutes. It took 190 minutes for Andy Murray to win the men’s final. That was after a 283 minutes semi final game.

    81 minutes to win 2 set women’s final, 190 minutes for 3 set men’s final. Same prize money for half the work. As usual.

    Women fought for "EQUALITY" in tennis: They get the same prize money as men for less sets in shorter time with weaker play and lower ticket prices.

    1. less sets (2 instead of 3 minimum)
    2. much shorter time
    3. of course, much weaker game. The 203 seeded man wiped 2 top 10 seeded women off the court in one afternoon game.Human Stupidity reported. Of course, there is no doubt that Murray would wipe Bartoli off the court playing left handed.
    4. and lower entrance money: anyone please tell me how much the tickets were to the men’s game vs. the woman’s game this year?
    5. Women usually have more time at hand to play doubles, thus finally earning more money then the men.

    But thus is modern politically correct EQUALITY. Same outcome for vastly different performance.

    The wait ended Saturday when Bartoli defeated Sabine Lisicki, 6-1, 6-4, in 81 minutes to win Wimbledon.  NYT

    Women lose to men in chess, darts, snooker, tennis,  math contests, spelling bees, Wikipedia participation, patent applications, and, amazingly can not even compete in cooking.

    Fire fighters are hampered by quota women who don’t have the strength to carry an injured comrade, to wrestle a ladder, or to break a door.

    But society needs quota women for "equality". Equal outcome for unequal performance. Roy Baumeister and others explained, why men have higher variance at all traits, even in those where they have same mean performance. Men are over-represented at the top, and at the bottom  (in prison, on death row, work accidents, homelessness, suicide and life span)

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Same prize money for half the time of weaker play. "Equality" at Wimbledon’s final.” »
    Same prize money for half the time of weaker play. "Equality&…
    » continues here »

    Pin-ups won’t be removed from historical planes. Today’s soldiers subject to "comprehensive visual inspection"

    Once upon a time, men and women had the liberty to adorn their working and living spaces the way they saw fit. From cave paintings 50000 years ago to pin-ups car repair shops 40 years ago.

    Venus_von_Willendorf_01Then came the feminist sexual trade union and decided that women need protection from such images1. Women are strong enough to become soldiers, but not strong enough to face nude pin-up photos of beautiful women in light clothes.

    In a memo sent on June 13, Navy Secretary Ray Mabus ordered that all sailors, Marines, cadets and civilian employees have their workplaces searched by June 28.

    The “comprehensive visual inspections” of the workspaces conducted by commanding officers will “ensure they are free from materials that create a degrading, hostile, or offensive work environment.”

    – See more at: cnsnews.com

    Surprisingly, the history of misogyny will persist at the air force museum.

    Pin-ups won’t be removed from historical planes

    An Air Force wide directive to find and remove inappropriate pictures, objects or other materials from work spaces and gathering sports won’t impact exhibits at the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force, the base commander at Wright-Patterson said.

    “I think the tradition and history at the Air Force museum is just that,” Col. Cassie Barlow, commander of the 88th Air Base Wing, said Friday. “That’s our history. We’re not going to go back and change those things because that’s part of our history and that’s an important part of our organization. I think the museum will keep the displays that they have just as they are.”

    pinup-bomberThe museum’s collection has several aircraft with nose art of pin-up models. For example, a World War II-era B-24D Liberator bomber on display shows a pin-up model reclining in a blue dress and a profanity used in the name of the plane.

    Age to prevent underage pinup girls

    Surprisingly, no age check was ordered, to make sure none of the pin-up girls is underage. In that case a pinup photo would constitute child porn  of 17 year old *children at the serious copine scale level 5. According to the voodoo theory of child pornography, the pinup model who long ago died of old age would be re-victimized in her grave, when gazed upon.

    Human-Stupidity is seriously concerned about the impact of underage nudity in stone-age cave paintings.

    Surprisingly, private surreptious possession of adult nudity is not yet repressed at the US armed forces.

    “For purposes of this specific inspection,” Sailors and Marines will not have their personal items searched.  Barracks, rooms, computers, lockers, cars, and cell phones will be off limits to inspectors. – cnsnews.com

    Outside feminist PC circles, it is widely known that available pornography helps reduce sexual violence against women and children (Milton Diamond). So this policy, of course, increases sexual assault by testosterone fueled 19 year old males deprived of wives, girl friends, prostitutes and even their favorite fapping pin-up.

    Child support judgments traumatize famous athletes, hamper NBA teams

     A $50,000, or mere $ 8,000 monthly child support judgment is the greatest career move for an uneducated young woman..Successful male athletes and singers get easily ruined by female predators empowered by feminist child support laws. Getting pregnant by such a man is like winning the jackpot.

    Highly paid basketball and football stars, boxers, rap singers are easy prey. They are high testosterone, impulsive, quick acting successful males, usually with more brawns then brains.

    We will point out numerous legal traps devised by the feminist sexual trade union in collaboration with religious zealots.

    Fathering out-of-wedlock kids has become commonplace among athletes, many of whom seem oblivious to the legal, financial and emotional consequences

    This shocking 5 part article is from 1998’s Sport Illustrated. Today, nothing has changed for the better. Probably athletes are probably a little less naïve by now.

    Paternity can be an expensive proposition. In several states the baseline amount for a man who is proved to have fathered a child is roughly 20% of his income as support until the child turns 18. Considerations such as time spent with the child and the income of the mother are factored into a complex equation and can slightly reduce or increase the award.

    A high earning athlete who has to pay to 7 children women 7 times 20% of his gross income certainly faces a dilemma.

    there are women who hunt pro athletes in the hope of becoming pregnant and filing paternity suits to make an income," says Pat Richie, the chaplain for the San Francisco Giants and 49ers. "I’d say that teams probably have two or three women per year who are purposely looking for this."

    Certainly there have been false charges made against athletes 4

     

    End of career, end of big income

    Add to that the short term nature of his dwindling income, and we understand how fading fame also brings about arrests for now un-payable child support judgments that exceed the poor ex-athlete’s waning gross income.

    High-wage earners such as athletes present courts with a dilemma: Should judges follow the 20% guideline, which would mean a windfall to mothers and children? Or should support payments cover only the basic needs of the children, depriving the youngsters of their dads’ standard of living? Many judges have compromised by limiting support—sometimes at $10,000 per month per child—regardless of the father’s income, a decision that has sparked debate among family-law attorneys.  2

    Even US$ 10.000 is un-payable for a simple man whose sports career is over. It is also cruel and unusual punishment to demand he depredate his savings until poverty, to pay such support.

    In some cases, however, even a player earning millions can fail to meet his obligations. In 1995 slugger Kevin Mitchell, now with the Oakland Athletics, was making $4.5 million a year. The next year he declared bankruptcy, in part because he was supporting four children by four women.

    Athletes’ out-of-wedlock kids can end up in poverty if their fathers are cut or retire before the children turn 18. "Often, you need to tell these women to bank as much money as they can because it’s going to be a very short payday," says Schwartz, the California paternity lawyer. "I’m handling a case involving an NBA player who had been making more than $2 million a year and this year wasn’t picked up. The mother was getting more than $5,000 a month, and suddenly we’re talking about $1,000 to $1,500. That’s only because, through good management, he still has some money. Some of these guys will be pumping gas, if they’re lucky." 6

     

    Does baby consume $10,000 per month?

    Nobody questions the sanity and necessity of awarding a child of an often poor mom US$ 50,000.- or even 3,000.- per month.  If that same woman had an honest, simple, working husband, $ 500 after tax income would feed an entire family, not just one child.

    Child support to support mom’s new lover and their children
    • Child support should cover the basic needs of a child, not luxury, much less a luxurious life for mom and her new lover. If mom wants lots of money, have her make the effort to treat a man so he voluntarily parts with his money. Not just lie about birth control.
    Pay child support, never see the child
    • It gets worse. In our modern matriarchy, even men who pay US$ 10.000 monthly in child support have no practically enforceable rights to actually meet and see their children.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Child support judgments traumatize famous athletes, hamper NBA teams” »
    Child support judgments traumatize famous athletes, hamper NBA tea…
    » continues here »