Category: Men’s Rights & Feminism

Convicted false rape accuser Heidi K. will not pay damages to falsely imprisoned Horst Arnold

Teacher Horst Arnold served his 5 year prison term for rape to the very last day. Soon thereafter a high court declared him obviously innocent and the accusations blatantly false. Still, he was not reinstated to the job he had lost. His false accuser, still anonymous, escapes financial damages by infinite appeals, using government paid lawyers. The real victim of her false accusations has to pay legal fees and thus threw the towel. The false accuser still receives government pension but applied legal trickery to make sure the victim of her accusation can never get at that money.

 

The teacher Heidi K. falsely accused her now deceased colleague Horst Arnold of rape. Arnold had five years in prison, was acquitted recently. Shortly thereafter, he died. Now it is official: Heidi K. will not have to pay damages to his daughter.

  • Even now, the false accuser’s last name is secret. "Heidi K". She is photographed with her face covered.  And the falsely convicted victim’s name is public.  It is disgusting.

    • The case of the teacher Horst Arnold,  accused wrongly of rape,  was one of the most spectacular miscarriages of justice in recent history. His colleague, Heidi K. had brought him to court, he was jailed, was later acquitted, but died shortly afterwards.

    The formerly in shape sports teacher died a broken man, having lost his house, money, job, reputation and health after an unjust 5 year prison term

    Horst Arnold’s daughter Heidi K. sued for damages. Now it is official: Heidi K. will not have to pay. Heidi K. gave up, due to excessive legal costs and small chance to actually receive the financial compensation.

    False accuser gets 5 1/2 years in prison for 5 year imprisonment of an innocent man

    Here is the good news: Heidi K got a 5 1/2 years prison term as a notorious and patholgical liar, pending appeal. (German). She  still remains anonymous and shamelessly uses government-paid lawyers to avoid paying her victim’s heirs. She was sentenced for false imprisonment. She could not be prosecuted for false accusations due to statute of limitations.

     

    Perverted Justice system imprisons innocent men with no due process 

    This begs the question: how has feminist rape hysteria managed to totally pervert due process in  our justice system , that any psychologically deranged woman can get a decent law abiding man into prison with the most absurd and incoherent rape accusations.

    In the original rape trial "the prosecution could not present any conclusive evidence, but the court believed Heidi K., amd followed their presentation in full. […] She had Charisma and could convince people. In her tears, evidence seemed to crystalize" [4] Impeccably groomed Heidi K. had taught class, minutes after the alleged rape in a much frequented room, after an alleged escape over a fire ladder and vomiting. Her anal fissure was found in her second medical exam, non-existent in the first exam. She alleged to have been threatened by the accused, a week after the fake rape. But the accuse had a good alibi he was in prison. In spite of such glaring inconsistencies, Horst Arnold was convicted. Felow teachers became suspicious only after several more years of Heidi K. telling fabulous stories that would make Baron von Münchhausen blush. The erroneous expert witnesses, and shoddy justice officials suffered no punishment at all. [4 5]

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Convicted false rape accuser Heidi K. will not pay damages to falsely imprisoned Horst Arnold” »
    Convicted false rape accuser Heidi K. will not pay damages to fals…
    » continues here »

    No Sex Please, we’re Japanese: virtual girlfriends and the closing of maternity wards and elementary schools

    Japan is closing maternity wards and elementary schools. Not many children get born. Society is aging quickly.

    Video:

    • @14 minutes: fewer Japanese marry. Only 2% of children born out of wedlock. Only 27% of couples have sex every week.
    • @15 minutes: Don’t miss the men with the virtual girl friends. One of them is married and hides the girl friend from his wife. He is not sure which of the two he would choose: wife or computer program.

     

    In the video, Japanese men keep repeating that a virtual girl friend is much nicer. The virtual girl friends are usually are teenage age, and the man plays the role of a teenager, too. Virtual girl friends are not messy, no trouble. Why bother with a real woman.

    Though, there is a certain desire for a real woman.

    • @32 minutes: Amazing Japanese Pompom dancers, minimum age requirement: 55 years, oldest is 81. They dance nicely enough to look like teenage cheer leaders, when seen from a distance.
    • @40: 20% of Japanese prisoners are over 65 years old. 50% of them reoffend.
    • @45: 70% of Japanese women drop out of the work force after they get children. With a lack of work force, this is considered a calamity.
    • @40 minutes: immigration as the solution?

     

     

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “No Sex Please, we’re Japanese: virtual girlfriends and the closing of maternity wards and elementary schools” »
    No Sex Please, we’re Japanese: virtual girlfriends and the c…
    » continues here »

    Help! My 18 year old girl friend has raped me 298 times

    "Please stop", he begged her. "I already came, I am tired, I need to sleep". To no avail. 19 year old Maria (name has been changed) will not take no for an answer. She straddles his face, pushes her pussy onto his mouth, taking his breath away: " Make me come!"  she demands of the groggy, sleepy, half drunk Paul (name has been changed). After one screaming orgasm, she puts a condom on his member and rides herself, cowgirl style, to another orgasm, over Paul’s protests.

    During the first 290 rapes (or "sexual assaults" , in some jurisdictions) Paul did not know he was a victim of rape, or felony sexual assault. That the constant barrage of sexual assaults by a gorgeous 19 year old blonde was deeply traumatizing for him. and would scar him for life. He was unaware that he was a date rape or marital rape survivor.

    He already knew that feminists had re-defined rape.  That consent could be withdrawn at any moment. That "No means No". That a man got convicted for 5 second *rape because he stopped only 5 seconds after the hitherto consenting girl said "stop".

    Still Paul was unaware that he was a rape victim. He thought that rape hysteria was a feminist ruse.

    Then he started reading avoiceformen and r/mensrights. The leading men’s rights web sites. There he found out that MRA actually agree with most of the feminist rape hysteria,  as long as pretty 25 year old female cheer leaders also get punished [4] for having sex with  220 pound 17 year old adolescent football player hunk victims.  

    He read how boys and men are frequent rape victims:  Boys raped more often than girls. Eivind Berge The Antifeminist

    Paul is still getting raped almost daily, but now he is aware that he is a victim of a terrible crime. Paul is asking for your advice:

    1. Is he actually getting raped or sexually assaulted?
    2. Is he traumatized for life
    3. Should he go to police and press charges against his abuser?
    4. Will he be believed? You know, women never lie about rape. But will they think men lie about rape (sexual assault).
    5. Should he record the sex act and his protests, to have PROOF of the vile crime he suffers from?
    6. Should he just enjoy the sex and then, a few years later, file charges of rape, like many women do nowadays? Or 40 years later, like in the Saville case
    7. He actually likes the sex in the morning. It is rape only in the evening. If she goes to prison for many years, he will miss it.  (this is not a joke; there was a case where a woman pressed rape charges. Among 30 sex acts, only #25 and #18 were rapes, the others, she confided, were consensual)

    Please answer the questions  in the comments below

     

    Further comments and questions

    1. Be aware, if the "victim" was a woman, the male "rapist" would be convicted, no doubt.
    2. Should MRA (men’s rights activists) be only concerned to make sure that a woman "rapist" would be treated with equal rigor. Or should MRA actually be concerned to keep men out of prison for travesties like 32-year-old man’s sex with 17-year-old was legal… but pictures of it cost him 8 years in prison. Note too that feminists are seriously concerned with keeping female husband assassins out of prison and successfully do so: How to Kill your Husband! A Tutorial. (Susan Falls’ Licence to Kill) .
    3. According to Human-Stupidity’s research, most sexually active heterosexual men suffered "rape" episodes like the above. Remember: once you say now, even in the slightest way, consensual sex becomes RAPE: Consensual sex becomes rape as soon as woman says "I need to go home", says California Supreme Court..
    4. Please report if you were victim or perpetrator of such rape, or if this never happened in your life.

    A woman won the 2013 Asics LA Marathon ahead of all men, won $ 50000 gender challenge. What’s the catch?

     

    In a surprising and inspiring race, a female first-time marathon runner won the 2013 LA Marathon.

    Aleksandra Duliba, a 27-year-old woman from Belarus, was the first runner, male or female, to cross the finish line Sunday, KTLA reports.    Aleksandra Duliba, LA Marathon 2013 Record-Breaking Winner, Was A First-Time Marathoner

    Isn’t it great. We knew it: women are superior to men in sports. It is only the patriarchy stops holding them back.

    Aleksandra Duliba of Belarus wins the 2013 Asics LA Marathon women’s race in her marathon debut with a time of 2:26:05 to beat the men and claim the $75,000 Asics challenge in Santa Monica Sunday morning March 17.   source

    This is well deserved.

    She earned $75,000 for her victory, $25,000 as the top women’s finisher and a $50,000 bonus for beating the top men’s finisher.  Huff post

    She won the "gender challenge".  The first to cross the finish line, proving female superiority. She should get a Million.

    2013 LA Marathon: Erick Mose finishes 2nd overall

    Erick Mose of Kenya finished first in the men’s competition with a time of 2:09:43, outrunning his fellow countryman Julius Keter in the final mile of the the marathon. Aleksandra Duliba won the overall competition  Universalsports

    Great. At least a man in second place.

    What a cheat!

    The were given women an 18:35 head start and Duliba ran the race 16:36 behind the men.  source

     

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “A woman won the 2013 Asics LA Marathon ahead of all men, won $ 50000 gender challenge. What’s the catch?” »
    A woman won the 2013 Asics LA Marathon ahead of all men, won $ 500…
    » continues here »

    Barack Obama Sr., bigamist, pedophile, child rapist?

    Barack Obama Jr. was likely conceived when his mother was still 17 years old. [1]

    According to federal law this is below the age of consent. A 17 year old *child is unable to consent, which automatically makes any act of sex rape.  "Rape is rape is rape"  (according to Barack Obama’s pal and Vice President  Joe Biden).

    Luckily, the age of consent in Hawaii is 16. So if sex occurred in Hawaii, it was not rape.

    Of course, in these modern days, Barack Obama Sr. still could be charged with crimes as diverse as grooming a child over the internet, sexting, crossing state lines with intent to have sex with a minor,

    Barack Obama Sr. already had shown prior preference for jailbait. Kenyan age of consent for unmarried people is 16. Kezia, born 1940,  was 14 when 18 year old Barack Senior married  her in 1954, in exchange for a dowry of 14 cows. 

    In 1954, Obama married Kezia Aoko[22] in a tribal ceremony. Wikipedia

    Kezia had her first baby at age 18. Maybe conceived at age 17.

    Anyone can do the math if Kezia Obama’s first child was conceived while the mother was still 17?

    Had Barack Obama Senior been a US resident, it would have been a felony to fly to Kenya with the intent to have sex with an underage girl under 18.

     

    Human-Stupidity Analysis

    We think it would behoove the US government to re-consider many age of consent, sexting, child porn laws, that put many men in prison for consensual sex with post pubertal adolescents.

    Many men languish in prison for the same acts that the father of President Barack Obama committed: sex with adolescent jail bait.

    Consider that Barack Obama, the President of the USA was likely conceived by an unmarried 17 year old woman. The president’s father, Barack Hussein Sr. also had a predilection for underage girls as young as 14, the age he married his first wife Kezia.

    The fact that the President’s father was a clear bigamist, married to 2-3 women at the same time would suggest to pursue bigamist US citizens with more leniency.

     

    The American Dream Love Story:
    Barack Obama’s Mom Was 17 When Barack Sr., A 24-Year-Old Married Man, Knocked Her Up

    Let’s ask a question that I haven’t seen before:

    How old was Ann Dunham when Barack Obama Sr., an already married 24-year-old, impregnated her?

     

     

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Barack Obama Sr., bigamist, pedophile, child rapist?” »
    Barack Obama Sr., bigamist, pedophile, child rapist?
    » continues here »

    How to Kill your Husband! A Tutorial. (Susan Falls’ Licence to Kill) .

    Australian court affirms licence to kill as Susan Falls, another "battered woman" walks free after execution-style murder of her husband

    On 4th March 2006, Claire Margaret McDonald gasped and burst into tears as a Victorian Supreme Court jury found her not guilty of the execution style murder of her husband, Warren John McDonald.

    The court was told that McDonald had donned camouflage gear and lay in wait with a high-powered rifle for her husband to approach. She fired six shots, mortally wounding her husband.

    McDonald successfully used the "battered woman syndrome" defence, claiming she had suffered years of abuse at the hands of her husband.

    Within days, Queensland woman, Susan Falls, having probably read the media reports of Heather McDonald’s stunning acquittal, decided to execute her allegedly abusive husband in the same fashion, in what prosecutors would describe as a cunning, calculated murder.

     

    Women need to know how to exercise their rights to kill their husbands.

     

    1) Inform yourself through case studies.

    Learn from others. How did others kill their husbands? What did they do to get away with it?  

  • Rita Graveline, Susan Falls, Mary Winkler. See also Nicole Ryan.
  • [Defending Battered Women on Trial] by theorist Elizabeth Sheehy
  • Go ahead, shoot your sleeping husband! It’s not murder!
  • A Century of Husband-Killing (149)

    Make sure you do your killing in the right jurisdiction. Australia is excellent. You might consider murder tourism: Travel to a country that is most favorable to husband execution.

    Women can learn from other successful murderesses. A certain amount of intelligence and cunningness is needed to pull it off. Like everywhere in life, low IQ people get discriminated against and might actually have to do do time in prison.

     

    2) Think up stories how your husband abused you.

    Absolutely no proof is needed, You may invent anything you wish. Read journals, books, crime stories to fertilize your fantasy.

    The press, the jury they will lap it up. No matter how trivial (husband was unfaithful, in the case of Lorena Bobbitt) or absurd (Susan Fall’s Husband held a raffle to decide who he would kill). Your dead husband will not be around to contradict you. If he is still around (Nicole Ryan), the court  will not call the husband to ask him

    Of course, if you can provoke your husband enough so witnesses see him lose his temper, or if you can file an unfounded police report accusing him of domestic violence, that would make an even better defense.

    •  

    3) Kill your husband

    Kill your husband ten-fold. Stab him dozens of times with a butcher knife, shoot him many times point blank in the head. Hours later, shoot again. Don’t worry. Shooting your groggy, drugged, half dead husband once more is self defense.

    Only males are subject to normal self defense laws that require you to be in instant danger, with no other way out.

    As a woman you have the right to pre-meditate, plan, buy murder weapons, get accomplices, even invite the kids to watch you shooting dad.

    You can choose if you call police and tell the truth, of if you first dump the corpse and keep police busy trying to find a lost husband. Be creative!

     

    4) Cry tears. Keep repeating the abuse stories. Get a good lawyer

    You may never ever fail and falter for a second to be sure to avoid conviction. Crying tears of fear is the key.

    Here it is useful if you are really crazy and paranoid, if you really believe in the serious threat to your life.  If not, you must be  a good actress.

    Nobody will ask you why you did not simply walk out, take the kids, go to a woman’s shelter.  Not even after you drugged him into profound sleep. Or why you could not put up a camera to record the constant violence and then put him in jail. Battered woman syndrome theory did this all for you: It postulates that women (and only women) don’t see the simple non-violent exit, rather they see no other way out then to kill.

     

    5) Keep his money, all family assets, children.

    Your hard work will be rewarded. If you picked a good, hard working husband, your killing him will be rewarded with all his worldly goods.

    Courts also know that it for the good of the children to stay with the murderess of their father. Even if they were witnesses to the murder. The girls will be prepared to imitate their mother, once they get married.

    More women would kill their husbands, if they knew about the financial rewards.

    If your husband does not have many assets, get a divorce with life long alimony, enforced by debtor’s prison and thus avail yourself of a life long slave labor. A dead husband has no more income that courts can hand over to you. So instead of killing, you may be better off to accuse your of domestic violence and child abuse, get a restraining order and subsequent divorce.

     

    6) Earn further money through interviews and books.

    Other killers have to give the proceeds to relatives of their victims. Spouse killing gives you all his property, and you may keep the proceeds of any book deals. Make sure you always cry tears, repeat abuse stories over and over. Do not show glee and happiness about your successful crime.

     

    7) Repeat with your next husband (?)

     

    Susan Falls "self defense" case details

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “How to Kill your Husband! A Tutorial. (Susan Falls’ Licence to Kill) .” »
    How to Kill your Husband! A Tutorial. (Susan Falls’ Licence …
    » continues here »

    Go ahead, shoot your sleeping husband! It’s not murder!

    Many women fail to conveniently kill their sleeping husbands, because they are unaware that shooting or knifing the sleeping husband is an act of courageous self defense.

    Human-Stupidity wants to enlighten women about their rights to kill. Thus more women will be unafraid to plan and execute their husband’s demise.

    It does not matter that your husband is a sweet, docile hen-pecked wimp. Just claim you were battered. YOU WILL BE BELIEVED.

    A more tender hearted woman should be aware of the convenient option to slice off a philandering man’s penis with total impunity, like Lorena Bobbitt.  

    False rape or trumped up domestic violence accusations are an option for the spineless and faint hearted who still don’t have the courage to use a gun or knife on a sleeping man.

     

    Thankfully, in the name of feminist EQUALITY, men do not have an option to plead "nagged man’s syndrome", or violation of honor to escape their just punishment for slapping or shoving their wife.

    Battered women’s “moral courage,” Sheehy writes in her book, “deserves our respect. “When women kill to save their own lives, they assert that they matter, that their lives count — even more than the lives of their abusers.”

    In the book [Defending Battered Women on Trial].Elizabeth Sheehy asserts:

    While very few women kill abusive men who are asleep or passed out, it’s “unfair” to charge them with first degree murder, Sheehy argues. “It’s not fair to characterize it as the most heinous form of murder, because it may be their own route to survival.” 
    Source: Battered women morally entitled to kill abusers, U of O professor asserts

     

    Short stint in jail for woman who killed her partner by cutting off his penis. 

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Go ahead, shoot your sleeping husband! It’s not murder!” »
    Go ahead, shoot your sleeping husband! It’s not murder!
    » continues here »

    Make fatherhood a man’s choice! Like a sperm donor, not forced to pay

    (A) Financial abortion, reproductive rights for men have been discussed by MRA’s, but usually rejected by feminists.

    We will see that some feminists actually propose that men should have reproductive rights other then be forced to pay up for unintended consequences for sex.

    (B) Further down we will also discuss the strange logic: If the father kills the fetus, it is murder. If the mother kills the fetus, it is reproductive rights.  See here, here, here, here and here.  When is it illegal to make reproductive choices for others? When you’re a man

     

    Make fatherhood a man’s choice!

    The burden of pregnancy will never be fair. Child support can be — but men need to have a chance to opt out

    Over the past fifteen years, some feminists have argued that ending the current child support system is an important social issue. In the October 19, 2000 issue of Salon,Cathy Young argued that women’s freedom to choose parenthood is a reproductive right men do not have but should. Her article, “A Man’s Right to Choose,” identifies abortion rights and adoption as options that allow women greater sexual freedom than men when a sexual encounter results in conception.  While there are alternatives to parental responsibility for women, for men, “in the eyes of the law, it seems that virtually no circumstances, however bizarre or outrageous, can mitigate the biological father’s liability for child support.”

    Amen!   Even if mother cheated, lied, or raped: father always pays child support.

    Kerrie Thornhill’s article “A Feminist Argument Against Child Support” in the July 18, 2011 issue of Partisans picks up this point, arguing that where birth control and safe abortion are legally available, choosing a sexual encounter should be a different choice than choosing to be a parent. She offers a three-step replacement for the current child support system. First, Thornhill writes that “when informed of a partner’s pregnancy, a man should get a single, time-sensitive opportunity to choose fatherhood.” Second, by accepting, a man would assume all the responsibilities of fatherhood, but by declining he would legally be no different than a sperm donor.

    Great suggestion. If a man wants no financial responsibility, he gets treated like a sperm donor. This is a great way to put it.Though it still begs the question if it was not best, in the interested of the well being of the child, if the man could contribute, visit, as he wishes.

     

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Make fatherhood a man’s choice! Like a sperm donor, not forced to pay” »
    Make fatherhood a man’s choice! Like a sperm donor, not forc…
    » continues here »