Tag: men’s rights

Kachelmann trial: Jörg Kachelmann’s court verdict May 31. Not guilty?

The verdict in the Jörg Kachelmann rape trial in Germany will be out on May 31. Human Stupidity plans to report as soon as possible.

132 days in jail, 43 days in court, starting September 6, 10 expert witnesses, several ex-girlfriends as witnesses. Only vague circumstantial evidence. No proof. Jörg Kachelmann rape trial without evidence but with clear prosecutor misconduct, victim’s lies.  Unfortumately, the public was excluded from major parts of the trial, thus nobody really knows all the relevant details of the case.

The world press reported the beginning of the trial and then just shut up and ignored it. Certainly they will report on the verdict.The German press reports in detail about Kachelmann.

The prosecution demands 4 years and 3 months, the defense wants an acquittal.

Human-Stupidity Analysis

All this messy court case, career destruction, jail time, ruinous cost for defense and expert witnesses is due only to

  1. removal of due process from our court system in rape and child abuse accusations.
  2. the lie that "all men are rapists". If it were not for the feminine myth that all men are rapists, the burden of proof would be really high to think that such a man would, out of a sudden, violently rape a woman at knife point:  A famous, well known, civilized and non-violent man that has a dozen girl friends and millions of female fans he could pick sex partners from.

German press reports about the Kachelmann rape case.

  1. Joerg Kachelmann | Die Zeit

  2. Topic Kachelmann | Der Spiegel

  3. Bild.de, about Kachelmann: the rainbow press paper hired arch-feminist Alice Schwarzer and tends to be anti-Kachelmann.

Against feminist entitlement bias: Gender equality requires women to retire older then men to have equal duration of retirement and years worked

In Britain, as in most countries, women retire at age 60, earlier then men (age 65). A clearly blatant sexist discrimination.

Analysis from the Men’s Network showed that men live 13 years in retirement whilst women enjoy 20 years. No mention from Saga and Unions Together on that point?

Women live a few years longer (Interim Life tables), work shorter years (due to child rearing vacations), contribute less to retirement funds. Women don’t pay appropriately higher retirement contributions during their work life, rather men pay for women’s longer retirement. In Brazil, to get full retirement benefits, women need to contribute for 30 years, men for 35.

Men pay for female privileges in early retirement and shorter work life (due to sexist legislation)

It says EU law prevents it from increasing men’s pension age before women’s,

Amazing. Why would there be such a clearly sexist law discriminating against men?

but surely that is a reason to delay the increase for everyone until 2020 rather than punish women? It’s certainly no justification for increasing women’s pension age by even more than that of men.  
‘How could I foresee such a discriminatory bombshell?’| Telegraph

Rectifying or reducing 70 years of legally codified female entitlement and male discrimination is punishing women?

Today’s men have been indoctrinated with feminist religious dogma from kindergarten on (Generation Y, raised on nothing but feminism, will be a nightmare for men). Thus men, like sheep, swallow any absurd feminist entitlement attitudes and allow such drivel to be published.

Since 1948, state pension has been paid to women at 60 and men at 65, it is only in 2018 that this injustice against men will be rectified, some 70 years later. And Altmann says pension policy is always against women. Unbelievable. I wonder what the male members of Saga think of her ‘balanced’ statement.

A good look at this and other issues about the effect on the genders was produced by Mark Easton of the BBC.

EQUALISATION OF STATE PENSION AGES AFTER 70 YEARS OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION AGAINST MEN IS STILL ATTACKED

Blatant large scale financial discrimination against men. Men paying women’s retirement benefits, and in exchange retiring later. Where are the million men marches for gender equality?

Equality means equality and men have been the most discriminated group when it comes to state pension age. For anyone to claim otherwise shows they have no sense or belief in what equality really means. They purposely only have one eye open. 
THE SCANDALOUS STATE PENSION AGE HYPOCRISY | The Rights Of Man

Why do men retire later then women

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Against feminist entitlement bias: Gender equality requires women to retire older then men to have equal duration of retirement and years worked” »
Against feminist entitlement bias: Gender equality requires women …
» continues here »

Jörg Kachelmann rape trial without evidence

The Jörg Kachelmann rape trial is the sensational trial of the year in Germany. A famous TV anchor whose program once went viral on YouTube, sex, multiple girl friends delight the rainbow press.  Serious press organs like "Der Spiegel" and "Die Zeit" arrived at the sensible conclusion that there is absolutely no evidence to support the accusation (or rather,  it appears to be a painstakingly planned false accusation).  In spite of mounting evidence to the contrary, feminists, led by feminist Icon Alice Schwarzer continue convinced that Kachelmann is guilty and accuse these press organs of partiality.

Rape trial without evidence

The so-called objective evidence in the rape case against Jörg Kachelmann, allegedly held by Mannheim Public Prosecutor’s Office, doesn’t exist. Several expert witnesses have so far testified in the rape trial. None found any supporting evidence that Jörg Kachelmann raped Simone D. On the contrary, the evidence contradicts the alleged victim’s story.  Additionally, the alleged victim, who had accused her ex-boyfriend of raping her at knife point, had to admit to having lied and fabricated some of the evidence herself.

On the other hand, the court painstakingly interviewed various ex-girlfriends of Kachelmann, who had absolutely no knowledge about the  alleged incident, but could only smear Joerg Kachelmann’s reputation. Some girl friends earned major amounts for interviews in the rainbow press, but at the same time insisted on privacy during their court hearings.

The prominent Swiss weather anchor Jörg Kachelmann, working for German television, was held in remand for several months before the rape trial held its first hearing, despite his claims of innocence, and despite the absence of any flight risk. Adding to this the non-existent danger of collusion, this jailing of a suspect, based on nothing but unproven allegations, amounts to breach of due process.

Surprisingly, the English speaking press has absolutely no coverage about the Kachelmann rape trial. Therefore, Human-Stupidity undertook the trouble of improving on Google translations to publish the translated text of an excellent article Two bruises but no other findings by  German News Magazine "Die Zeit

Two bruises but no other findings in alleged rape case

Did Jörg Kachelmann rape his lover Simone D? The experts’ interpretation of the evidence differs from that of the prosecution.

The Mannheim District Court has been hearing Jörg Kachelmann’s case for six months now. That’s how long the 5th criminal division has been searching for evidence to prove that the accused weatherman of the first German television channel raped his occasional mistress, Claudia Simone D. The search has so far been futile. In fact, as the case progresses, incriminating evidence steadily dissipates.

On 9 February 2010, the 37-year old Simone D. made a police statement according to which, after a row in her flat, Jörg Kachelmann raped her at knife point and threatened to kill her. The Mannheim Public Prosecutor’s Office had always made a public pretence of having objective evidence indicating the defendant’s culpability. This assertion, however, has been seriously challenged over recent months.

German courts deal with rape cases on a daily basis. That the Kachelmann proceedings have turned into a mammoth case without an ending in sight is not unrelated to the fact that investigators spent weeks interrogating the victim/witness without questioning her statements. The Kachelmann case proves beyond doubt that, in this day and age, no potential victim of a sexually related crime need fear the authorities. Rape victims humiliated and bullied by the police and judiciary were merely a post war phenomenon, now long gone, though still preferentially exemplified by women’s rights activists. Today, a woman who reports a rape in Germany can expect a maximum of discretion, understanding, solidarity and attention. The extent of this is demonstrated fully on Simone D.

The criminal investigation department accepted the rape story of Kachelmann’s girlfriend without any verification of her statement. In a remark made immediately after the report on 10 February 2010, the female interrogating officer from Schwetzingen wrote: “We feel the woman is making a credible impression”. When questioned by the court six months later on the basis of this evaluation, the police officer was unable to respond.

Credulity and naivety – unexpected qualities in a judge – were also displayed later, in the witness statement before the Mannheim District Court by the custodial judge, who ordered Kachelmann –pleading innocence – to be held in remand on 10 March 2010. The judge stated, as reason for the arrest warrant, that Kachelmann’s version, according to which he first had consensual sexual intercourse with Simone D. but then left after a jealous outburst from her, simply did “not appear plausible” to him. In addition, he held it on assumption that “someone who accuses another of committing a criminal offence would be telling the truth”.

Accusers are always believed. Especially rape accusers. In spite of evidence that false rape accusations have been a weapon of choice since biblical times and nowadays are endemic. Credible experts from police and academia estimate that 20% – 60% of rape accusations are false.  Of course, feminist writers vehemently disagree. (Additionally, most rape accusations are not about forcible rape in the traditional meaning of the word.

The Mannheim Public Prosecutor’s Office has also been supportive of the victim/witness from the beginning, although the woman, whose hopes had been dashed by Kachelmann, would have very understandable motives for a false accusation. The Public Prosecutors continued to support Simone D. even when, in the course of the investigation, she admitted to not only having lied in parts of her statement, but also to fabricating some of the incriminating evidence herself (see ZEIT file “Schuldig auf Verdacht” from 24 June 2010).

When her manipulations were discovered, at the end of April 2010, Kachelmann had already spent a month in custody. In spite of this the Public Prosecutor’s Office dismissed Simone D’s attempt to mislead the court as a “minor issue”. 
Source: Two bruises but no other findings | Die Zeit

The Hofstra rape case is an example where 4 men were jailed and on the verge of getting 20 year verdicts based on the contradictory accusation of one lone girls. Only video evidence cleared the falsely accused.

This clear bias in favor of accusers can be found world wide. The Obama administration ordered US colleges to convict rape suspects in internal administrative proceedings by preponderance of evidence, a far cry from "beyond reasonable doubt".  Add to this panel members totally biased in favor of the accuser, and a conviction is virtually assured, no matter how flimsy or patently wrong the accusation.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Jörg Kachelmann rape trial without evidence” »
Jörg Kachelmann rape trial without evidence
» continues here »

"Protection from Abuse" (restraining) order is Abuse

Restraining orders or protection-from-abuse orders from a random stranger are not a big deal. But if you are ordered to stay away from your home, your kids, your documents, your clothing, your medicines, your library, computer, then this is a disaster.

Restraining order to immediately stay away from own house,
all belongings, documents, clothing, children?

How can you be kicked out of your own home, with no prior warning, no chance to take your ID and documents, pick up a change of underwear, not even your credit card so you can buy underwear. But you have the obligation to continue paying the mortgage, or rent, are prohibited to even send a text message to your kids.  If this is a shared marital home, it is very bad. If this is the man’s home and the complainant a mere girl friend he allowed to live there, that now kicks him out of his own property and home, the injustice is worse.

protection-from-abuse-temporary-restraining-orderThis restraining order has the same effect as if a tsunami or tornado had passed over one’s home. Immediate homelessness, living on the street. But it is worse. After a tsunami, one can go back to the remnants of the home and try to find one’s Identification papers, and also has a chance to find a shelter. And all this basically with no due process, with no proof, and for crimes as simple as allegations of annoying a woman, without corroborating proof.

Slightest violation of unjustified protection from abuse/ restraining order:
mandatory felony jail terms

Any innocent unintended violation of a restraining order leads to mandatory felony jail terms as happened to Dr. Emerson.  His life was ruined due to unproven (probably false accusations), a protection from abuse/restraining order and the consequential criminalization of his perfectly legal gun collection. 

Why can’t she leave if she feels threatened?

Why can’t she leave if she feels threatened? Even if he committed violence, a man’s home should be sacred. 

Whoever is the main home owner, the main tenant, the payee of rent should have the right to stay.  Are there no constitutional protections? This is worse then anything I have read about the worst dictatorships.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “"Protection from Abuse" (restraining) order is Abuse” »
"Protection from Abuse" (restraining) order is Abuse
» continues here »

Legal right to renounce child support empowers women, increases birth rates

Contractual freedom to agree about child support rights

Many women want to have a baby, but, for some reason, don’t find the appropriate man or husband. A man willing to the father and take on fatherly duties. The typical solution is to “forget” to take the pill or just let the man falsely assume she is taking birth control.

child-support-hearing1) Women should have right to renounce rights to father’s child support

We propose that

a) A woman should be empowered to contractually agree with a man to have his baby and not demand any child support.

Advantages:

  1. In most developed countries, more babies are urgently needed. This probably will lead to higher birth rates. The richer, more educated, more capacitated women will have children of their choice, that are wanted.
  2. No manipulation needed, no dishonesty about accidentally “forgotten birth control” to get pregnant against the man’s expressed wish
  3. female empowerment: the woman can have her wish, pick the father of her choice and have a baby.
      1. Most men would feel honored to be chosen as a father, without being obliged to support the baby nor having to get along with the woman for the next 20 years.
      2. many men would, voluntarily, by mutual agreement give some aid and support in child raising, in spite of the waiver.
  4. funny-pictures-child-support-catIt fixes our perverted system in which
    1. the most irresponsible and uncontrolled, least intelligent and poorest men have the most offspring
      1. these people are the most unfit genetically (their offspring will be less intelligent and have less self control)
      2. these people are also most unfit as parents and educators: they are less responsible, less intelligent
      3. these people are less unfit financially to provide a good home
    2. society pays for these offspring, with welfare that often encourages the poor to have more offspring to receive more money. These children are not welcome and loved, they are either accidents or planned to increase welfare income. A bad and traumatic start of a life for a baby.
    3. The well-to-do fear child support payments. Poor deadbeats that are unable to pay, and anonymous one night stances can get unlimited offspring without legal and financial responsibility

    5. island-child-supportb) A man should be allowed to contractually assume all child care and support obligations after birth

    Equally, a man can agree to take a child, after birth, assuming all child care and support.

    This might convince a woman to forego abortion, or to become pregnant.

    This ultimately empowers women, because it still is fully her choice to decide to terminate a pregnancy. She might find it attractive to have a baby without obligations.

    Or she might do it as favor for the man, almost like a surrogate pregnancy.

    All this would help to increase birth rate and reduce the population shortage problem in developed countries.

    Who will pay for children’s needs?

    If one party was relieved of his/her obligation, the other party.

    1. The party that took up the contractual obligation, mostly the mother. After all are women not empowered and independent? Don’t women have professions, salary, self sufficiency. Women did this for centuries and millennia, before the advent of liberated professional women and welfare.
    2. Welfare support. Government already pays support for children of deadbeat dads and moms in poverty. Why can’t they pay for the honest working tax paying father? Whoever took up the responsibility should pay him/herself, unless they are below poverty level.

    Your comments are welcome

    All this is a suggestion and, of course, open to discussion. Please comment

    Contractual freedom to agree about child support rights

    Many women want to have a baby, but, for some reason, don’t find the appropriate man or husband. A man willing to the father and assume fatherly duties. The typical solution is to dupe a man into fatherhood by lying about birth control.

    child-support-hearing1) Women should have right to renounce rights to father’s child support

    We propose that

    a) A woman should be empowered to contractually agree with a man to have his baby and not demand any child support.

    Advantages:

    1. In most developed countries, more babies are urgently needed. This probably will lead to higher birth rates. The richer, more educated, more capacitated women will have children of their choice, that are wanted.
    2. No manipulation needed, no dishonesty about accidentally "forgotten birth control" to get pregnant against the man’s expressed wish
    3. female empowerment: the woman can have her wish, pick the father of her choice and have a baby.
      1. Most men would feel honored to be chosen as a father, without being obliged to support the baby nor having to get along with the woman for the next 20 years.
      2. many men would, voluntarily, by mutual agreement give some aid and support in child raising, in spite of the waiver.
  5. funny-pictures-child-support-catIt fixes our perverted system in which
    1. the most irresponsible and uncontrolled, least intelligent and poorest men have the most offspring
      1. these people are the most unfit genetically (their offspring will be less intelligent and have less self control)
      2. these people are also most unfit as parents and educators: they are less responsible, less intelligent
      3. these people are less unfit financially to provide a good home
    2. society pays for these offspring, with welfare that often encourages the poor to have more offspring to receive more money. These children are not welcome and loved, they are either accidents or planned to increase welfare income. A bad and traumatic start of a life for a baby.
    3. The well-to-do fear child support payments. Poor deadbeats that are unable to pay, and anonymous one night stances can get unlimited offspring without legal and financial responsibility

    6. island-child-supportb) A man should be allowed to contractually assume all child care and support obligations after birth

    Equally, a man can agree to take a child, after birth, assuming all child care and support.

    This might convince a woman to forego abortion, or to become pregnant.

    This ultimately empowers women, because it still is fully her choice to decide to terminate a pregnancy. She might find it attractive to have a baby without obligations.

    Or she might do it as favor for the man, almost like a surrogate pregnancy.

    All this would help to increase birth rate and reduce the population shortage problem in developed countries.

    Who will pay for children’s needs?

    If one party was relieved of his/her obligation, the other party.

    1. The party that took up the contractual obligation, mostly the mother. After all are women not empowered and independent? Don’t women have professions, salary, self sufficiency. Women did this for centuries and millennia, before the advent of liberated professional women and welfare.
    2. Welfare support. Government already pays support for children of deadbeat dads and moms in poverty. Why can’t they pay for the honest working tax paying father? Whoever took up the responsibility should pay him/herself, unless they are below poverty level.

    Your comments are welcome

    All this is a suggestion and, of course, open to discussion. Please comment

    Contractual freedom to agree about child support rights

    Many women want to have a baby, but, for some reason, don’t find the appropriate man or husband. A man willing to the father and assume fatherly duties. The typical solution is to dupe a man into fatherhood by lying about birth control.

    child-support-hearing1) Women should have right to renounce rights to father’s child support

    We propose that

    a) A woman should be empowered to contractually agree with a man to have his baby and not demand any child support.

    Advantages:

    1. In most developed countries, more babies are urgently needed. This probably will lead to higher birth rates. The richer, more educated, more capacitated women will have children of their choice, that are wanted.
    2. No manipulation needed, no dishonesty about accidentally "forgotten birth control" to get pregnant against the man’s expressed wish
    3. female empowerment: the woman can have her wish, pick the father of her choice and have a baby.
      1. Most men would feel honored to be chosen as a father, without being obliged to support the baby nor having to get along with the woman for the next 20 years.
      2. many men would, voluntarily, by mutual agreement give some aid and support in child raising, in spite of the waiver.
  6. funny-pictures-child-support-catIt fixes our perverted system in which
    1. the most irresponsible and uncontrolled, least intelligent and poorest men have the most offspring
      1. these people are the most unfit genetically (their offspring will be less intelligent and have less self control)
      2. these people are also most unfit as parents and educators: they are less responsible, less intelligent
      3. these people are less unfit financially to provide a good home
    2. society pays for these offspring, with welfare that often encourages the poor to have more offspring to receive more money. These children are not welcome and loved, they are either accidents or planned to increase welfare income. A bad and traumatic start of a life for a baby.
    3. The well-to-do fear child support payments. Poor deadbeats that are unable to pay, and anonymous one night stances can get unlimited offspring without legal and financial responsibility

    7. island-child-supportb) A man should be allowed to contractually assume all child care and support obligations after birth

    Equally, a man can agree to take a child, after birth, assuming all child care and support.

    This might convince a woman to forego abortion, or to become pregnant.

    This ultimately empowers women, because it still is fully her choice to decide to terminate a pregnancy. She might find it attractive to have a baby without obligations.

    Or she might do it as favor for the man, almost like a surrogate pregnancy.

    All this would help to increase birth rate and reduce the population shortage problem in developed countries.

    Who will pay for children’s needs?

    If one party was relieved of his/her obligation, the other party.

    1. The party that took up the contractual obligation, mostly the mother. After all are women not empowered and independent? Don’t women have professions, salary, self sufficiency. Women did this for centuries and millennia, before the advent of liberated professional women and welfare.
    2. Welfare support. Government already pays support for children of deadbeat dads and moms in poverty. Why can’t they pay for the honest working tax paying father? Whoever took up the responsibility should pay him/herself, unless they are below poverty level.

    Your comments are welcome

    All this is a suggestion and, of course, open to discussion. Please comment

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Legal right to renounce child support empowers women, increases birth rates” »
    Legal right to renounce child support empowers women, increases bi…
    » continues here »

    Sexual harassment is in the eye of the beholder. No fright, no distress.

    "Harassment" perceived as non-threatening isn’t distressing

     For women, sexual harassment was distressing when they saw it as frightening, but not when they saw it as bothersome. "We were surprised by this finding," Settles said. "We thought women would be negatively impacted if they saw their harassment as frightening or bothersome."[…]
    Study Finds Surprising Gender Differences Related to Sexual Harassment |Science Daily

    The same come-on perceived as non-threatening and thus non-threatening and non-traumaticSurprise. Open-minded researcher Isis H. Settles from Michigan State University and colleagues get unexpected results that don’t fit the feminist mold.

    All depends on how the victim perceives the harassment. The enclosed two cartoons depicts how the same harassing behavior can elicit either shock and terror, or, in the second  picture, below, mild amusement.

    This of course makes us wonder if the feminist hysteria is not self-fulfilling. Women in "macho" cultures, who were never indoctrinated in feminist hysteria and never knew that cat calls or invitation to sex were something frightening, don’t get distressed by such action.  So the solution to the harassment problem would be to empower women, not to get frightened easily.

    Of course, undue influence using violence or strong coercion is something different.  Feminists tend to confound clearly violent illegal criminal rape and harassment with normal or slightly disturbing but non-violent and non-abusive behavior.

    Definition of Harassment

    Sexual harassment is defined as unwanted gender-based comments or behaviors (Fitzgerald, 1996) with three subtypes. Gender harassment refers to behaviors that disparage an individual on the basis of her or his gender (e.g., comments that insult women s intelligence; comments regarding behaviors a real man would do). Unwanted sexual attention refers to unwanted touching or attempts to establish a sexual relationship (e.g., repeated requests for dates). Finally, sexual coercion refers to attempts to coerce a sexual relationship in exchange for job-related threats or benefits (e.g., promising a promotion if the target engages in sexual activities). Frightened or Bothered: Two Types of Sexual Harassment Appraisals

    Maybe we are ill informed. It seems that mere looks (See Gervais’ "objectifying gaze"), compliments, innuendo, bantering is enough to qualify as sexual harassment.

    Great unexpected results! Teasing and "harassing" in non-threatening environment is not frightening. Probably because Dr. Isis Settles’ subjects were not distraught feminist-indoctrinated damsels in college freshmen experiments but empowered women in the armed forces.

    In other words: a creepy guy in a deserted forest coming on strong, that is frightening. Or your boss threatening to immediately fire you if you don’t yield to his/her advances. Workplace bantering mostly is not frightening but just bothersome. Like so many things in life. If a person gets frightened by workplace innuendo, then Human-Stupidity suggests to that  the problem is in the mind of the perceiver who feels frightened by harmless non-dangerous situations. 

    Our feminist laws repress men and protect women like defenseless victims

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Sexual harassment is in the eye of the beholder. No fright, no distress.” »
    Sexual harassment is in the eye of the beholder. No fright, no dis…
    » continues here »

    Cute child photo scares Reddit’s men’s rights into child porn frenzy

    Child Porn or Cutsie child photo? with-this-i-am-going-to-control-your-life

    Reddit men’s rights is one of the most powerful sites countering feminist indoctrination and propaganda on the web. Even mens rights proponents are scared out of their wits about the greatest taboo on earth, the child porn witch hunt.

    The founder and moderator of reddit’s r/mensrights reported this photo to authorities. If men’s rights movement joins the witch hunt that jails mainly men for decades for mere possession of photos often almost as harmless as the one in question here, who will defend men’s rights to liberty? Note that the photo has a deeper meaning, about how men’s “pussy obsession” allows women’s to have power in men’s life.

    He is worried about this:

    “r/mensrights, a forum for over 21,000 disgruntled misogynists, claims that they seek to rescind laws that protect rape victims, molested children, and battered women in order to ‘restore equality to men.’ Given the shocking content that is being called ‘pornographic’ that was posted and endorsed by its fan base, it seems only fitting that their motives be called into question. the image is reported to contain two very young children exploring each other’s sexual organs. Does this community really wish to do justice for ‘oppressed’ men? Or do they just want carte-blanche to victimize children and rape their wives?”

    Femimedia would eat that kind of shit up.

    The reddit r/mensrights moderator might be right. It is worse saying anything in defense of “child porn” then saying “the earth revolves around the sun, the bible got that wrong” during the middle age inquisition. It is a sure way to get ostracized and to detract from any fact and topic one might want to focus on.

    I am begging users, if you see sexual images involving children, report it immediately to ASACP. No one should want that shit in here. submitted by kloo2yoo

    A post was up for 12 hours or so, while I was away. No one had sent a message to the modqueue, and no one had reported it. that user has been banned, and the post reported to law enforcement, and to the Reddit admins.

    http://www.asacp.org/

    I’m fucking disgusted and I’m fucking pissed, and I almost closed and locked the forum, but I don’t want to take it out on all 21,546 other users. don’t do that shit.

    Now reporting this to child porn persecution authorities, that really is going overboard. But, asacp probably think kloo2you is pulling their leg and will not report this to police, afraid of making themselves a laughing stock. So maybe not much damage is being done.

    Imagine if this same image was posted on a feminist forum, would the asacp need to be involved? LOL! of course not!

    Only men are pedophiles!

    Thanks for keeping up the stereotype get a kloo2yoo.

    There is a major rift in the “Men’s rights movement”. Most men’s righters are conservative fathers who are worried about the false domestic violence accusation industry, about debtor’s prison for fathers unable to pay the alimony that reduces them to work slaves. They could care less about the thousands men being locked up in prison for 20 years for often inadvertent possession of photos, often of mere nude adolescent erotica  (read more here) or for having consensual sex with a 17 year old girl that was in a over-21-bar thanks to a fake ID.

    20 years ago I overheard leading academic authorities in sexology “Child Porn is the new witch hunt”.  So is adolescent sexuality.

    So if mainstream men’s rights thinks they need to join the unjust persecution of men for possession of harmless photos, they should re-name themselves “father’s rights”. And a “free men’s sexuality” movement is urgently needed.  Human-Stupidity is one of the few sites daring to stare down the sex offender persecution monster.

    Please read more in human stupidity’s child porn witch hunt section.

    Child Porn or Cutsie child photo? with-this-i-am-going-to-control-your-life

    Reddit men’s rights is one of the most powerful sites countering feminist indoctrination and propaganda on the web. Even mens rights proponents are scared out of their wits about the greatest taboo on earth, the child porn witch hunt.

    The founder and moderator of reddit’s r/mensrights reported this photo to authorities. If men’s rights movement joins the witch hunt that jails mainly men for decades for mere possession of photos often almost as harmless as the one in question here, who will defend men’s rights to liberty? Note that the photo has a deeper meaning, about how men’s "pussy obsession" allows women’s to have power in men’s life.

    He is worried about this:

    "r/mensrights, a forum for over 21,000 disgruntled misogynists, claims that they seek to rescind laws that protect rape victims, molested children, and battered women in order to ‘restore equality to men.’ Given the shocking content that is being called ‘pornographic’ that was posted and endorsed by its fan base, it seems only fitting that their motives be called into question. the image is reported to contain two very young children exploring each other’s sexual organs. Does this community really wish to do justice for ‘oppressed’ men? Or do they just want carte-blanche to victimize children and rape their wives?"

    Femimedia would eat that kind of shit up.

    The reddit r/mensrights moderator might be right. It is worse saying anything in defense of "child porn" then saying "the earth revolves around the sun, the bible got that wrong" during the middle age inquisition. It is a sure way to get ostracized and to detract from any fact and topic one might want to focus on.

    I am begging users, if you see sexual images involving children, report it immediately to ASACP. No one should want that shit in here. submitted by kloo2yoo

    A post was up for 12 hours or so, while I was away. No one had sent a message to the modqueue, and no one had reported it. that user has been banned, and the post reported to law enforcement, and to the Reddit admins.

    http://www.asacp.org/

    I’m fucking disgusted and I’m fucking pissed, and I almost closed and locked the forum, but I don’t want to take it out on all 21,546 other users. don’t do that shit.

    Now reporting this to child porn persecution authorities, that really is going overboard. But, asacp probably think kloo2you is pulling their leg and will not report this to police, afraid of making themselves a laughing stock. So maybe not much damage is being done.

    Imagine if this same image was posted on a feminist forum, would the asacp need to be involved? LOL! of course not!

    Only men are pedophiles!

    Thanks for keeping up the stereotype get a kloo2yoo.

    There is a major rift in the "Men’s rights movement". Most men’s righters are conservative fathers who are worried about the false domestic violence accusation industry, about debtor’s prison for fathers unable to pay the alimony that reduces them to work slaves. They could care less about the thousands men being locked up in prison for 20 years for often inadvertent possession of photos, often of mere nude adolescent erotica  (read more here) or for having consensual sex with a 17 year old girl that was in a over-21-bar thanks to a fake ID.

    20 years ago I overheard leading academic authorities in sexology "Child Porn is the new witch hunt".  So is adolescent sexuality.

    So if mainstream men’s rights thinks they need to join the unjust persecution of men for possession of harmless photos, they should re-name themselves "father’s rights". And a "free men’s sexuality" movement is urgently needed.  Human-Stupidity is one of the few sites daring to stare down the sex offender persecution monster.

    Please read more in human stupidity’s child porn witch hunt section.

  7. Woman causes permanent brain damage in infant: 2 years. Kills baby: 4 years. Man possesses photos: priceless (11 years) by: admin (1)

    March 17, 2011, 15:47

      Greenburgh nanny sentenced for shaking baby two years in state prison and three years of post release supervision on her July 2008 guilty plea to reckless assault on a child in the first degree. As a result of the violent shaking, the baby suffered a subdural hematoma and diffuse rental hemorrhages,…

  8. Unborn Child Porn is Unborn Child Abuse. Outlaw fetal abuse! by: Agent Provocateur (2)

    March 15, 2011, 13:39

    "Unborn child pornography is unborn child abuse. In any of its forms, it is an affront to humanity. Any delay in reporting unborn child pornography gives a green light to those who take pleasure from the rape of unborn children."             …

  9. "Operation Protect Our Children" mistakenly shuts down 84,000 Sites with no child porn by: admin (2)

    February 18, 2011, 06:25

    What if you woke up one morning and your blog’s URL pointed to a Department of Homeland Security page that said, "Website seized for trafficking in child pornography"? That’s what happened to 84,000 innocent site owners this week, and there’s no guarantee it won’t happen again. Over the past few…

  10. 17 year old "children"? United Nations confesses political manipulation of "child" definition by: Devils Advocate (5)

    February 1, 2011, 03:55

    The United Nations manipulated the definition of "child" on purpose! So child protection laws could be extended to adolescent youth without need to be voted again. Human-Stupidity.com found the smoking gun. Proof is on the United Nations web site. Q – What does the UN mean by "youth," and…

  11. Couple stoned to death by Taliban Video. 17 year old girl stoned to death, too. by: Devils Advocate (4)

    January 30, 2011, 07:54

    The two people have been publicly stoned to death in Afghanistan’s once peaceful north over an alleged love affair.  Warning: Don’t worry: only legal depictions of killing and gore,, no offensive illegal nudity, eroticism or sex.! © ABC News Television The alleged lovers,…

  12. Jailed for possession of video of himself masturbating when he was 12. Another victim of child porn laws faces minimum 2 year jail. by: admin (5)

    January 20, 2011, 10:16

    A young man got arrested for possession of child porn, depicting a 12 year boy old masturbating. It is his own video: he recorded himself when he was 12 years old. Mandatory minimum jail sentence: 2 years. Think hard: maybe you took some indecent photos of yourself. Or your family album contains nunde photos mom…

  13. Eek! A Male! Pedophile hysteria hurts and kills children by: Devils Advocate

    January 14, 2011, 05:15

    Imagine, putting ointment on a 3 month old’s vagina.  Every man is a suspect for pedophilia. Soon no father will dare to change his daughter’s diapers. Avid consumers of child abuse books on Amazon have a dirty mind. 30 years ago, before the pedophilia hysteria, the idea of abusing a 1 year old would not even have…

  14. "Watching child porn victimizes the child". The Voodoo science of child pornography laws by: Devils Advocate (20)

    December 26, 2010, 05:00

       "However, what he didn’t turn his mind to at the time is that merely having possession and viewing images such as this does victimize and hurt the individual portrayed in the image. He appreciates that now.” Senior gets jail time, probation for having single image of child pornography  We at Human-Stupidity…

  15. Legalizing Child Pornography reduces child sex abuse crimes (Scientific study by Dr. Milton Diamond, U. Hawaii) by: admin (4)

    December 11, 2010, 08:53

    Legalizing child pornography is linked to lower rates of child sex abuse Study carried out in Czech Republic confirms similar results in Japan and Denmark Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA),…

  16. Cruel child porn laws kill, "destroying lives unnecessarily” (Judge Jack B. Weinstein) by: Devils Advocate (7)

    November 1, 2010, 20:22

    Airline safety is compromised because "nude airport scanner" violates child porn laws. 32 men committed suicide in one CP case alone. Toddlers die because men are afraid to help them. Jack B. Weinstein: A reasonable judge opposing cruel mandatory child porn jail terms for mere possession

  17. Hollywood movies glorify criminal heroes: how romantic! by: admin (1)

    September 28, 2010, 05:18

    Romantic Hollywood movies are full of illegal (criminal) actions, perpetrated by movie heroes, our role models!  Interestingly, most of these illegalities are considered highly romantic (when perpetrated by a heartthrob movie star) "When done in real life, many of the tricks used by onscreen singletons to successfull…

  18. Brooke Shields nude: exploited pedophile magnet? by: admin

    September 26, 2010, 17:33

    Brooke Shields, now 44, posed for a nude photo when she was 10 years old. Now Richard Prince’s photograph of the picture, called "Spiritual America," has been yanked from a major exhibition at the Tate Modern. If pedophiles didn’t already know about "Spiritual America," the Richard Prince photo taken of a nude,…

  19. Movie of 15 year old girl repeatedly brutally stomped on head: prime time news. Depicting the same girl posing nude would be child porn, a heinous crime.. by: admin (5)

    August 31, 2010, 06:04

    The beating last month of a 15-year-old girl in the transit tunnel at Westlake Center as security personnel watched without intervening is prompting a review of King County Metro’s policies for its unarmed guards. The incident — which was partially captured on surveillance video — happened about 7:15 p.m.…

  20. Sexting: Courts victimize Teens with child porn charges for exchanging their own nude photosKinderpornografie: by: Devils Advocate (6)

    August 1, 2010, 02:18

    More child porn insanity! Children nowadays need legal counsel to know if and how they can photograph themselves or have relations with other teenagers, or else they can spend years in jail and remain the rest of their lives on sex offender lists. US court on ‘sexting’: Child porn or child’s play? 01/15/2010…

  21. "Child Food-Porn" (Junk food advertising) makes our children obese & unhealthy by: Devils Advocate (7)

    July 3, 2010, 06:21

    Junk food makes our children fat, obese and unhealthy which leads to disease and premature death. It does not kill instantly, only in the long run. "Child Food-Porn" (Junk food advertising) makes our children obese & unhealthy. A 17 year-old cannot consent to sex  (hence consensual sex with a minor is rape). A…

  22. EU Requests To Retain User Data From Search Engines to protect children from pedophiles by: admin (1)

    June 29, 2010, 23:11

    23. Child Porn or Cutsie child photo? with-this-i-am-going-to-control-your-life

    Reddit men’s rights is one of the most powerful sites countering feminist indoctrination and propaganda on the web. Even mens rights proponents are scared out of their wits about the greatest taboo on earth, the child porn witch hunt.

    The founder and moderator of reddit’s r/mensrights reported this photo to authorities. If men’s rights movement joins the witch hunt that jails mainly men for decades for mere possession of photos often almost as harmless as the one in question here, who will defend men’s rights to liberty? Note that the photo has a deeper meaning, about how men’s "pussy obsession" allows women’s to have power in men’s life.

    He is worried about this:

    "r/mensrights, a forum for over 21,000 disgruntled misogynists, claims that they seek to rescind laws that protect rape victims, molested children, and battered women in order to ‘restore equality to men.’ Given the shocking content that is being called ‘pornographic’ that was posted and endorsed by its fan base, it seems only fitting that their motives be called into question. the image is reported to contain two very young children exploring each other’s sexual organs. Does this community really wish to do justice for ‘oppressed’ men? Or do they just want carte-blanche to victimize children and rape their wives?"

    Femimedia would eat that kind of shit up.

    The reddit r/mensrights moderator might be right. It is worse saying anything in defense of "child porn" then saying "the earth revolves around the sun, the bible got that wrong" during the middle age inquisition. It is a sure way to get ostracized and to detract from any fact and topic one might want to focus on.

    I am begging users, if you see sexual images involving children, report it immediately to ASACP. No one should want that shit in here. submitted by kloo2yoo

    A post was up for 12 hours or so, while I was away. No one had sent a message to the modqueue, and no one had reported it. that user has been banned, and the post reported to law enforcement, and to the Reddit admins.

    http://www.asacp.org/

    I’m fucking disgusted and I’m fucking pissed, and I almost closed and locked the forum, but I don’t want to take it out on all 21,546 other users. don’t do that shit.

    Now reporting this to child porn persecution authorities, that really is going overboard. But, asacp probably think kloo2you is pulling their leg and will not report this to police, afraid of making themselves a laughing stock. So maybe not much damage is being done.

    Imagine if this same image was posted on a feminist forum, would the asacp need to be involved? LOL! of course not!

    Only men are pedophiles!

    Thanks for keeping up the stereotype get a kloo2yoo.

    There is a major rift in the "Men’s rights movement". Most men’s righters are conservative fathers who are worried about the false domestic violence accusation industry, about debtor’s prison for fathers unable to pay the alimony that reduces them to work slaves. They could care less about the thousands men being locked up in prison for 20 years for often inadvertent possession of photos, often of mere nude adolescent erotica  (read more here) or for having consensual sex with a 17 year old girl that was in a over-21-bar thanks to a fake ID.

    20 years ago I overheard leading academic authorities in sexology "Child Porn is the new witch hunt".  So is adolescent sexuality.

    So if mainstream men’s rights thinks they need to join the unjust persecution of men for possession of harmless photos, they should re-name themselves "father’s rights". And a "free men’s sexuality" movement is urgently needed.  Human-Stupidity is one of the few sites daring to stare down the sex offender persecution monster.

    Please read more in human stupidity’s child porn witch hunt section.

  23. Woman causes permanent brain damage in infant: 2 years. Kills baby: 4 years. Man possesses photos: priceless (11 years) by: admin (1)

    March 17, 2011, 15:47

      Greenburgh nanny sentenced for shaking baby two years in state prison and three years of post release supervision on her July 2008 guilty plea to reckless assault on a child in the first degree. As a result of the violent shaking, the baby suffered a subdural hematoma and diffuse rental hemorrhages,…

  24. Unborn Child Porn is Unborn Child Abuse. Outlaw fetal abuse! by: Agent Provocateur (2)

    March 15, 2011, 13:39

    "Unborn child pornography is unborn child abuse. In any of its forms, it is an affront to humanity. Any delay in reporting unborn child pornography gives a green light to those who take pleasure from the rape of unborn children."             …

  25. "Operation Protect Our Children" mistakenly shuts down 84,000 Sites with no child porn by: admin (2)

    February 18, 2011, 06:25

    What if you woke up one morning and your blog’s URL pointed to a Department of Homeland Security page that said, "Website seized for trafficking in child pornography"? That’s what happened to 84,000 innocent site owners this week, and there’s no guarantee it won’t happen again. Over the past few…

  26. 17 year old "children"? United Nations confesses political manipulation of "child" definition by: Devils Advocate (5)

    February 1, 2011, 03:55

    The United Nations manipulated the definition of "child" on purpose! So child protection laws could be extended to adolescent youth without need to be voted again. Human-Stupidity.com found the smoking gun. Proof is on the United Nations web site. Q – What does the UN mean by "youth," and…

  27. Couple stoned to death by Taliban Video. 17 year old girl stoned to death, too. by: Devils Advocate (4)

    January 30, 2011, 07:54

    The two people have been publicly stoned to death in Afghanistan’s once peaceful north over an alleged love affair.  Warning: Don’t worry: only legal depictions of killing and gore,, no offensive illegal nudity, eroticism or sex.! © ABC News Television The alleged lovers,…

  28. Jailed for possession of video of himself masturbating when he was 12. Another victim of child porn laws faces minimum 2 year jail. by: admin (5)

    January 20, 2011, 10:16

    A young man got arrested for possession of child porn, depicting a 12 year boy old masturbating. It is his own video: he recorded himself when he was 12 years old. Mandatory minimum jail sentence: 2 years. Think hard: maybe you took some indecent photos of yourself. Or your family album contains nunde photos mom…

  29. Eek! A Male! Pedophile hysteria hurts and kills children by: Devils Advocate

    January 14, 2011, 05:15

    Imagine, putting ointment on a 3 month old’s vagina.  Every man is a suspect for pedophilia. Soon no father will dare to change his daughter’s diapers. Avid consumers of child abuse books on Amazon have a dirty mind. 30 years ago, before the pedophilia hysteria, the idea of abusing a 1 year old would not even have…

  30. "Watching child porn victimizes the child". The Voodoo science of child pornography laws by: Devils Advocate (20)

    December 26, 2010, 05:00

       "However, what he didn’t turn his mind to at the time is that merely having possession and viewing images such as this does victimize and hurt the individual portrayed in the image. He appreciates that now.” Senior gets jail time, probation for having single image of child pornography  We at Human-Stupidity…

  31. Legalizing Child Pornography reduces child sex abuse crimes (Scientific study by Dr. Milton Diamond, U. Hawaii) by: admin (4)

    December 11, 2010, 08:53

    Legalizing child pornography is linked to lower rates of child sex abuse Study carried out in Czech Republic confirms similar results in Japan and Denmark Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA),…

  32. Cruel child porn laws kill, "destroying lives unnecessarily” (Judge Jack B. Weinstein) by: Devils Advocate (7)

    November 1, 2010, 20:22

    Airline safety is compromised because "nude airport scanner" violates child porn laws. 32 men committed suicide in one CP case alone. Toddlers die because men are afraid to help them. Jack B. Weinstein: A reasonable judge opposing cruel mandatory child porn jail terms for mere possession

  33. Hollywood movies glorify criminal heroes: how romantic! by: admin (1)

    September 28, 2010, 05:18

    Romantic Hollywood movies are full of illegal (criminal) actions, perpetrated by movie heroes, our role models!  Interestingly, most of these illegalities are considered highly romantic (when perpetrated by a heartthrob movie star) "When done in real life, many of the tricks used by onscreen singletons to successfull…

  34. Brooke Shields nude: exploited pedophile magnet? by: admin

    September 26, 2010, 17:33

    Brooke Shields, now 44, posed for a nude photo when she was 10 years old. Now Richard Prince’s photograph of the picture, called "Spiritual America," has been yanked from a major exhibition at the Tate Modern. If pedophiles didn’t already know about "Spiritual America," the Richard Prince photo taken of a nude,…

  35. Movie of 15 year old girl repeatedly brutally stomped on head: prime time news. Depicting the same girl posing nude would be child porn, a heinous crime.. by: admin (5)

    August 31, 2010, 06:04

    The beating last month of a 15-year-old girl in the transit tunnel at Westlake Center as security personnel watched without intervening is prompting a review of King County Metro’s policies for its unarmed guards. The incident — which was partially captured on surveillance video — happened about 7:15 p.m.…

  36. Sexting: Courts victimize Teens with child porn charges for exchanging their own nude photosKinderpornografie: by: Devils Advocate (6)

    August 1, 2010, 02:18

    More child porn insanity! Children nowadays need legal counsel to know if and how they can photograph themselves or have relations with other teenagers, or else they can spend years in jail and remain the rest of their lives on sex offender lists. US court on ‘sexting’: Child porn or child’s play? 01/15/2010…

  37. "Child Food-Porn" (Junk food advertising) makes our children obese & unhealthy by: Devils Advocate (7)

    July 3, 2010, 06:21

    Junk food makes our children fat, obese and unhealthy which leads to disease and premature death. It does not kill instantly, only in the long run. "Child Food-Porn" (Junk food advertising) makes our children obese & unhealthy. A 17 year-old cannot consent to sex  (hence consensual sex with a minor is rape). A…

  38. EU Requests To Retain User Data From Search Engines to protect children from pedophiles by: admin (1)

    June 29, 2010, 23:11

    39. Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Cute child photo scares Reddit’s men’s rights into child porn frenzy” »
    Cute child photo scares Reddit’s men’s rights into chi…
    » continues here »

    Márcio Costa accuses pretty funk rapper politician wife Verônica Costa of 20 hours of torture. No domestic violence arrest was made.

     

    Verônica Costa, city councilwomen and famous funk rapper in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,  was accused by her husband Márcio Costa to have ordered her brother and step father to savagely torture him for 20 hours with beatings and acid. He claims they tied his arms and legs with chains, beat him, doused him in kerosene or gasoline and threatened to set him ablaze. As proof he has his serious injuries, second and third degree burns. Police found gasoline in their home, an item that most people would not be possessing routinely in their home. 

    Torture victim in hospital Márcio Costa Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, husband of funk rapper Verônica da Costa

    There could be potential doubts about the accuser’s truthfulness. Though it would be the first time of a victim inflicting serious injury upon himself in order to make false accusations.

    Brazilian men accused of domestic violence get arrested and jailed without bail for accusations of merely shoving or lightly slapping a woman. (google "lei Maria da Penha") 

    Detail of severe burns on the tortured husband's legs

    Márcio Costa claims that, during the torture session, his wife asked him about marital infidelity, asking for the name of his alleged lover. She also kissed him in the midst of the torture.

    The alleged domestic violence torturer was not arrested, rather she is counter-accusing her husband of being a violent drug addict. She claims he arrived home with all the injuries.  Domestic violence is an unbailable crime.

    Husband claims to have escaped when he was left with only one relative guarding him, he claims they were planning to kill him. Immediately after his escape he already told a neighbor about the torture. Women can get men arrested even if they tell the story months after the alleged facts.

    In addition, torture is a special crime with specially severe punishment in Brazil.

    Af

    More misandry from Brazil

    The Brazilian congress just approved a law that prohibits bodily searches of women. No word about men.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Márcio Costa accuses pretty funk rapper politician wife Verônica Costa of 20 hours of torture. No domestic violence arrest was made.” »
    Márcio Costa accuses pretty funk rapper politician wife Ver…
    » continues here »