How to Kill your Husband! A Tutorial. (Susan Falls’ Licence to Kill) .

Australian court affirms licence to kill as Susan Falls, another "battered woman" walks free after execution-style murder of her husband

On 4th March 2006, Claire Margaret McDonald gasped and burst into tears as a Victorian Supreme Court jury found her not guilty of the execution style murder of her husband, Warren John McDonald.

The court was told that McDonald had donned camouflage gear and lay in wait with a high-powered rifle for her husband to approach. She fired six shots, mortally wounding her husband.

McDonald successfully used the "battered woman syndrome" defence, claiming she had suffered years of abuse at the hands of her husband.

Within days, Queensland woman, Susan Falls, having probably read the media reports of Heather McDonald’s stunning acquittal, decided to execute her allegedly abusive husband in the same fashion, in what prosecutors would describe as a cunning, calculated murder.


Women need to know how to exercise their rights to kill their husbands.


1) Inform yourself through case studies.

Learn from others. How did others kill their husbands? What did they do to get away with it?  

  • Rita Graveline, Susan Falls, Mary Winkler. See also Nicole Ryan.
  • [Defending Battered Women on Trial] by theorist Elizabeth Sheehy
  • Go ahead, shoot your sleeping husband! It’s not murder!
  • A Century of Husband-Killing (149)

    Make sure you do your killing in the right jurisdiction. Australia is excellent. You might consider murder tourism: Travel to a country that is most favorable to husband execution.

    Women can learn from other successful murderesses. A certain amount of intelligence and cunningness is needed to pull it off. Like everywhere in life, low IQ people get discriminated against and might actually have to do do time in prison.


    2) Think up stories how your husband abused you.

    Absolutely no proof is needed, You may invent anything you wish. Read journals, books, crime stories to fertilize your fantasy.

    The press, the jury they will lap it up. No matter how trivial (husband was unfaithful, in the case of Lorena Bobbitt) or absurd (Susan Fall’s Husband held a raffle to decide who he would kill). Your dead husband will not be around to contradict you. If he is still around (Nicole Ryan), the court  will not call the husband to ask him

    Of course, if you can provoke your husband enough so witnesses see him lose his temper, or if you can file an unfounded police report accusing him of domestic violence, that would make an even better defense.


    3) Kill your husband

    Kill your husband ten-fold. Stab him dozens of times with a butcher knife, shoot him many times point blank in the head. Hours later, shoot again. Don’t worry. Shooting your groggy, drugged, half dead husband once more is self defense.

    Only males are subject to normal self defense laws that require you to be in instant danger, with no other way out.

    As a woman you have the right to pre-meditate, plan, buy murder weapons, get accomplices, even invite the kids to watch you shooting dad.

    You can choose if you call police and tell the truth, of if you first dump the corpse and keep police busy trying to find a lost husband. Be creative!


    4) Cry tears. Keep repeating the abuse stories. Get a good lawyer

    You may never ever fail and falter for a second to be sure to avoid conviction. Crying tears of fear is the key.

    Here it is useful if you are really crazy and paranoid, if you really believe in the serious threat to your life.  If not, you must be  a good actress.

    Nobody will ask you why you did not simply walk out, take the kids, go to a woman’s shelter.  Not even after you drugged him into profound sleep. Or why you could not put up a camera to record the constant violence and then put him in jail. Battered woman syndrome theory did this all for you: It postulates that women (and only women) don’t see the simple non-violent exit, rather they see no other way out then to kill.


    5) Keep his money, all family assets, children.

    Your hard work will be rewarded. If you picked a good, hard working husband, your killing him will be rewarded with all his worldly goods.

    Courts also know that it for the good of the children to stay with the murderess of their father. Even if they were witnesses to the murder. The girls will be prepared to imitate their mother, once they get married.

    More women would kill their husbands, if they knew about the financial rewards.

    If your husband does not have many assets, get a divorce with life long alimony, enforced by debtor’s prison and thus avail yourself of a life long slave labor. A dead husband has no more income that courts can hand over to you. So instead of killing, you may be better off to accuse your of domestic violence and child abuse, get a restraining order and subsequent divorce.


    6) Earn further money through interviews and books.

    Other killers have to give the proceeds to relatives of their victims. Spouse killing gives you all his property, and you may keep the proceeds of any book deals. Make sure you always cry tears, repeat abuse stories over and over. Do not show glee and happiness about your successful crime.


    7) Repeat with your next husband (?)


    Susan Falls "self defense" case details

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “How to Kill your Husband! A Tutorial. (Susan Falls’ Licence to Kill) .” »
    How to Kill your Husband! A Tutorial. (Susan Falls’ Licence …
    » continues here »

    Go ahead, shoot your sleeping husband! It’s not murder!

    Many women fail to conveniently kill their sleeping husbands, because they are unaware that shooting or knifing the sleeping husband is an act of courageous self defense.

    Human-Stupidity wants to enlighten women about their rights to kill. Thus more women will be unafraid to plan and execute their husband’s demise.

    It does not matter that your husband is a sweet, docile hen-pecked wimp. Just claim you were battered. YOU WILL BE BELIEVED.

    A more tender hearted woman should be aware of the convenient option to slice off a philandering man’s penis with total impunity, like Lorena Bobbitt.  

    False rape or trumped up domestic violence accusations are an option for the spineless and faint hearted who still don’t have the courage to use a gun or knife on a sleeping man.


    Thankfully, in the name of feminist EQUALITY, men do not have an option to plead "nagged man’s syndrome", or violation of honor to escape their just punishment for slapping or shoving their wife.

    Battered women’s “moral courage,” Sheehy writes in her book, “deserves our respect. “When women kill to save their own lives, they assert that they matter, that their lives count — even more than the lives of their abusers.”

    In the book [Defending Battered Women on Trial].Elizabeth Sheehy asserts:

    While very few women kill abusive men who are asleep or passed out, it’s “unfair” to charge them with first degree murder, Sheehy argues. “It’s not fair to characterize it as the most heinous form of murder, because it may be their own route to survival.” 
    Source: Battered women morally entitled to kill abusers, U of O professor asserts


    Short stint in jail for woman who killed her partner by cutting off his penis. 

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Go ahead, shoot your sleeping husband! It’s not murder!” »
    Go ahead, shoot your sleeping husband! It’s not murder!
    » continues here »

    Brazilian congress plans heavy fines to companies whenever a woman gets paid less then a man

    Even in countries with Latin machismo like Brazil, feminism is almost unopposedly changing laws to unjustly benefit women at the detriment of men. They even have slut walks in Brazil on 4th of July in São Paulo.

    The Brazilian congress is examining the bill 6.393/2009. If passed into law, companies will be fined retroactively every time a woman earning less than a man. The fine is five times the pay difference observed throughout the entire employment period.
    The retroactive effect is one of the absurdities that inhabit that bill. Another is the direction of the fine to the affected employee. […]And the men? What will they say this measure? What can they do if your salary is lower than that of a woman? 
    Salários: interferência indevida – JOSÉ PASTORE  Wages: improper interference (Translation)

    This is the opinion of a reasonable blogger, published in today’s newspaper "O Globo". . He worries that companies lose discretion to reward performance and differentiate pay. Probably, he thinks, the result will be that nobody gets a raise, everyone gets the base salary for his profession. So nobody can feel discriminated against.

    feminista-conceicao-sampaioOf course, feminists and politicians think differently.

    Mrs. Conceição Sampaio estimates that as a woman qualifies for and enters the job market she wins autonomy and thus can also change the statistics of crimes against women." […] The domestic violence, according to Mrs. Conceição, has always been an important issue and will remain so, but the quest for empowerment and independence of women is also important.

    The MP emphasizes the approval of Law project No. 6.393/2009, of congressman Marcal Filho (PMDB / MS), which establishes fines to combat the difference in pay between men and women in Brazil.
    "Many advances have been achieved, but we still have inequality in the Brazilian labor market. People need to get paid for what they do. This is important. And the Legislature could not stay out of this discussion, "said the councilor.


    According to president of ALEAM State Representative Richard Nicholas (PSD), the public hearing is extremely important, because in addition to recognizing the importance of women in the labor market, since they already occupy  various management positions, it shows that progress is needed. Ricardo Nicholas points out that there are data showing that women in the same work as men still receive a lower salary. "It is necessary to fight this," emphasizes Nicholas.
    The President of the Legislative adds that women have distinguished themselves not only the sensitivity but also for their skill, dedication and discipline. And he recalled that the woman has more than one work shift. "She has the business and also works part to take care of family, children, home. Our tribute is for women to be placed increasingly on the labor market, with the certainty of having the same rights, "he said.


    1. Example how to calculate the fine: suppose the man earns $ 3300, the woman earns $ 3000 monthly. For 5 years of work, the difference would be 5 * 12 * $ 300 multiplied by 5 for the fine:  $ 90 000.
    2. Women having more days off, maternity leave, pension subsidized by menWarren Farrell explains the reasons for the so called pay gap.
    3. In divorce and separation, women will inherit government subsidized real estate property, decrees Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff
    4. Brazil has special laws against domestic violence against women and children 2 3 and special police stations for crimes against women.

    Márcio Costa accuses pretty funk rapper politician wife Verônica Costa of 20 hours of torture. No domestic violence arrest was made.


    Verônica Costa, city councilwomen and famous funk rapper in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,  was accused by her husband Márcio Costa to have ordered her brother and step father to savagely torture him for 20 hours with beatings and acid. He claims they tied his arms and legs with chains, beat him, doused him in kerosene or gasoline and threatened to set him ablaze. As proof he has his serious injuries, second and third degree burns. Police found gasoline in their home, an item that most people would not be possessing routinely in their home. 

    Torture victim in hospital Márcio Costa Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, husband of funk rapper Verônica da Costa

    There could be potential doubts about the accuser’s truthfulness. Though it would be the first time of a victim inflicting serious injury upon himself in order to make false accusations.

    Brazilian men accused of domestic violence get arrested and jailed without bail for accusations of merely shoving or lightly slapping a woman. (google "lei Maria da Penha") 

    Detail of severe burns on the tortured husband's legs

    Márcio Costa claims that, during the torture session, his wife asked him about marital infidelity, asking for the name of his alleged lover. She also kissed him in the midst of the torture.

    The alleged domestic violence torturer was not arrested, rather she is counter-accusing her husband of being a violent drug addict. She claims he arrived home with all the injuries.  Domestic violence is an unbailable crime.

    Husband claims to have escaped when he was left with only one relative guarding him, he claims they were planning to kill him. Immediately after his escape he already told a neighbor about the torture. Women can get men arrested even if they tell the story months after the alleged facts.

    In addition, torture is a special crime with specially severe punishment in Brazil.


    More misandry from Brazil

    The Brazilian congress just approved a law that prohibits bodily searches of women. No word about men.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Márcio Costa accuses pretty funk rapper politician wife Verônica Costa of 20 hours of torture. No domestic violence arrest was made.” »
    Márcio Costa accuses pretty funk rapper politician wife Ver…
    » continues here »

    “Emotional terrorist” or the “violence prone” women (Erin Pizzey)

    Pizzey differentiates between genuine battered women and violence prone women or “emotional terrorists”. Unconsciously, these women seek or create hostile or violent relationships.

    A battered person is the unwilling and innocent victim of his or her partner’s violence; a violence prone person is the unwilling victim of his or her own violence  […] A clear distinction to be made between a woman who has accidentally become involved with a violent partner and who now wishes to leave and never return again, and a woman who, for deep psychological reasons or for own, seeks out a violent relationship or a series of violent relationships, with no intentions of leaving.

    […] Opposition against my work with violence prone women and against the theories growing from this work has arisen among certain circles women working in the field of family violence who self identify as “feminists”. […] It is this circle women, clinging fast to a  specific set of political and rhetorical beliefs, who have attempted to suppress my theories.  (The emotional terrorist and the violence-prone by Erin Pizzey)

    Emotional Terrorist and the Violence-Prone by Erin Pizzey $9.99 B003Y5H7YK (Kindle edition)
    (download Kindle for PC from and get the free preview chapter of this book. Very informative)

    Erin Pizzey opened the very first women’s shelters, where women victims of domestic violence could flee to.  To her own surprise she found, that a large percentage of these women were not genuine battered women that needed help to get out of violent relationships.

    In domestic violence, men are always at fault. Erin Pizzey breaks a taboo: from her own vast experience running women’s shelters, she discovered a type of women that either seeks, provokes, or creates the violent environment.

    Important: See all 5 videos

    Many readers will discover that they encountered women of this type before, be it in news about domestic violence, be it their own girl friend or wife, or their own mother.

    Pizzey’s findings counter the feminist dogma, that the women is always the victim, and the man is the perpetrator. Feminists countered Pizzey with extreme hostility. Feminists managed to get her book removed from most libraries. Her books are very hard to find.

    Human-Stupidity Analysis

    Conventional wisdom about domestic violence and divorce is based on feminist dogma, on false premises. Hence, the real problems will never be solved and false solutions harm innocent children and men.

    The “guilty” emotional terrorist is a victim of her own unconscious rage and a victim of inept society: society, police, therapists and the lawt help the emotional terrorist to get her revenge but fail to help her to cure her real deep seated emotional behavior. She creates her own misery, all life long. She destroys her family, harms her husband, and might set up her children to become as disfunctional as she is.

    Further Human Stupidity Analysis
    1) It is also worth analyzing, if the concept of equality in relationships has not failed.  Constant bickering and arguing is not productive. Conflicts need to be solved and cannot be dragged on forever. It seems, that if one person yields, and the other person has the final say, that is the only way how a family relationship can work.

    In every enterprise, in court, everywhere, the boss (or a majority vote), make definite decisions which must be respected by the over-ruled minority. In the EEA (environment of evolutionary adaptedness) , the classic stone-age family structure, this would, most likey be the man, or the larger family or tribal unit.

    There is significant research in psychology, that in happy life long couples, there always is one dominant partner who has the final say.  (yes, this could be the woman)

    2) PS:I differ from Pizzey here: It is quite plausible that this emotional terrorist behavior has a genetic component. There certainly are women, who, in spite of adverse childhood, do not become “violence prone”. And some violence prone women might have helped to actually create their own traumatic childhood, by their own unruly temperament.

    The emotional terrorist

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ““Emotional terrorist” or the “violence prone” women (Erin Pizzey)” »
    “Emotional terrorist” or the “violence prone&#82…
    » continues here »

    Lorena Bobbit forgives her husband (she cut off his manhood 16 years ago)

    The woman that mutilated her husband,  cut off her husband’s dick and threw it out of the car window, forgave her husband, after the husband expressed remorse and asked for forgiveness .  And poor Lorena stressed how much her husband had hurt her.  No remorse. Yes. You are reading right! The mutilator did not ask forgiveness, no, she forgave!  Must see the video.

    The back story: In June of 1993 after having a fight, Lorena cut off her husband’s manhood with a knife while he was asleep, then fled and threw it out of her car window. Later, Lorena’s trial was carried live, and after the stunning testimony, she was ultimately found not guilty by reason of temporary insanity.

    This is how far feminist inequality attitudes and laws got us.  Can you imagine a man that mutilates his wife, cuts off her breasts, gets acquitted.  And then shows no remorse but demands and gets an excuse from his victim? The final proof for gender inequality in our days. Men can be castrated, arrested. And women who cut off her husband’s dick get no punishment and demand excuse for his insensitivity!

    “[At] our own wedding reception, he left me alone,” says Lorena. “We didn’t have a honeymoon, so to speak, because you left me at our own wedding to flirt with girls.”

    “Basically I learned to be a pick-up artist when I was married,” says John, “and that’s something I shouldn’t have done.”

    “I’m really sorry,” adds John in a bombshell apology. “There was a lot of neglect there; I wasn’t there for you. You needed me to be there. I wasn’t emotionally, physically — it was a very confusing hard time you went through.”

    “That means a lot to me,” says Lorena. “I forgive you, but I never forget. I’m not angry anymore. I’m free. I remember the things, that past hurt, and obviously it hurts you too.”

    This is why men get repressed by women. No man says anything. No man’s movement!  If it were the other way around, the entire world press would be up in arms. Headlines all over. Feminists calling news rooms, making demonstration, heads of government making statements. But a man getting mutilated by a women? Serves him right, he deserves it. Womanizer. Hurt her feelings.

    Does this need a Human-Stupidity analysis?

    Feminists managed to totally pervert laws, and the general human undersanding of law, order and justice.  As I said in other posts, female capacities to subvert press, organisations and public opinion is nothing more then awe inspiring.  Men are stupid victims of the common unconscious manipulation.

    Readings from

    1. When a “Rape” is not a Rape! The Abuse of the word “Rape”. & the Perversion of Language
    2. Supreme Court oks indefinite detention for possession of photos. But violent robbers get freed.
    3. Teenage Sexuality
    4. Years of Jail for “clicking on child porn link”. But cutting off her husband’s dick entitles to an excuse
    5. Rape Laws: dismantling of due process explained step by step

    Tiger Woods: why can’t he have open marriage and have fun?

    A domesticated Tiger Woods asks for forgiveness for being a man. Woods who could have thousands of women had a mere 14 women over a period of many years. Tiger’s mistake was to agree on a non-open marriage and to project the good boy image.  Like most men, Woods got into the typical vicious cycle of false promises and deceit, instead of being honest and standing up for his rights as a powerful and highly desirable alpha male.  And to add insult to injury, he now does “sexual addiction therapy” to rid him of normal male feelings and impulses. Maybe he ought to get castrated

    What good is it for a man to earn US$ 100 Million if he cannot have fun? Here is Tiger’s truth:

    I felt that I had worked hard my entire life and deserved to enjoy all the temptations around me. I felt I was entitled. Thanks to money and fame, I didn’t […] have to go far to find them.

    But then he went on asking for forgiveness. He disappointed his wife, his fans, his business partners.

    I am also aware of the pain my behavior has caused to those of you in this room. I have let you down. I have let down my fans. For many of you, especially my friends, my behavior has been a personal disappointment. To those of you who work for me, I have let you down, personally and professionally. My behavior has caused considerable worry to my business partners.

    He has not caused any pain to me. Actually, I found his behavior endearing. Of course, his business partners who profit from Tiger Woods’ squeaky clean image, they have reason to worry.  Maybe Woods should settle for earning a mere 50 million a year and having fun, instead of making 100 Million.

    Woods’mother put things into perspective:

    Afterward, Woods’ mother, Kultida Woods, spoke to reporters, saying how proud she is of him.

    “Golf is just like life, when you make a mistake, you learn from your mistake and move on stronger. That’s the way he is,” she said.

    “I am upset the way media treated him like he’s a criminal. … He didn’t kill anybody, he didn’t do anything illegal,” she said.

    “They’ve being carrying on from Thanksgiving until now. That’s not right.”

    Sure, Tiger Woods did not keep his agreement, his vow of faithfulness.  Maybe he should not have agreed to these condicions in the first place.  Why does a rich powerful man abdicate his freedom and vow to be “faithful”, to never look at another woman again?

    I’ve had a lot of time to think about what I have done. My failures have made me look at myself in a way I never wanted to before. It is now up to me to make amends. And that starts by never repeating the mistakes I have made. It is up to me to start living a life of integrity.

    Don’t make vows of faithfulness, and you can live a life with fun and enjoy integrity. Did he not take good care of his family? Fed them well. Earned a lot of money for them? Just he was foolish enough to get trapped in a vow of “fidelity”.

    Now here is a rare positive example of another famous “pervert” husband’s wife supporting a husband’s freedom:

    The wife of Portsmouth manager Avram Grant has hit back at allegations her husband was caught in a ‘Thai’ brothel by claiming: ‘He can do whatever he likes with his body.’

    Tiger should have gotten himself such a wife. I envy Avram Grant, he got himself a great open minded liberal wife.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Tiger Woods: why can’t he have open marriage and have fun?” »
    Tiger Woods: why can’t he have open marriage and have fun?
    » continues here »