Category: Stupidity-Dogmas

Stupidity, dogmas, taboos, prejudices, unconsciousness

Worldwide campaign against Julien Blanc, Pickup Artist

Brazilian TV confirmed in prime time news, that the ministry of the exterior will not give a visa nor permit entry to Julien Blanc for allegedly promoting violence against women. women letting their anger out with machine guns, that is good PC business

 "Pick-Up Artist" pushing Japanese women’s heads down to his crotch

 

In the US and Europe, attempts to expel convicted felon illegal foreigners rarely succeed.  Felons, ISIS terrorists, mercenaries rarely get denied visas and rarely get kicked out of countries. Hooligans, street brawlers, convicted robbers rarely get kicked out of Australia or blocked entry into Brazil.   So the Julien Blanc case is a demonstration of the awesome power of feminist activism! Feminist power, like the license to kill husbands and impunity for Lorena Bobbitt‘s penis slicing.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Worldwide campaign against Julien Blanc, Pickup Artist” »
Worldwide campaign against Julien Blanc, Pickup Artist
» continues here »

Pick up artist Julien Blanc, expelled from Australia, barred from Brazil and more countries

 

Is This The Most Hated Man in the World? | Time

Pick up artist Julien Blanc [1] [2] has been forced to leave Australia. Britain and Canada are also considering a ban

Is Julien Blanc the most hated man in the world? A series of online petitions against him suggest he might be.

Australia revoked his visa and expelled Julien Blanc

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Pick up artist Julien Blanc, expelled from Australia, barred from Brazil and more countries” »
Pick up artist Julien Blanc, expelled from Australia, barred from …
» continues here »

Racism disclaimer! Are we racist for citing statistics and research?

We wish prosperity, success for Africans and Blacks world wide

We actually would be extremely happy if Africa could follow in the footsteps of Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea and become rich, highly productive and low crime citizens and states. We would love to see Blacks world wide to become leaders in scientific research, earn Nobel Prizes in natural sciences.

But we do not want ………

  1. Black success based on unjust quota, Black Privilege  job admissions, hiring and promotion of fire fighters, in affirmative action college admission, affirmative action in substandard college graduation.
  2. censorship, taboo, repression of free speech and severe punishment for speaking the truth (James Watson),
  3. repression of scientific research , free information (Rushton). 
We do propose equal opportunities. Not equal outcome.

Like Martin Luther King, we favor color blindness, not special perks, advantages, quotas determined by skin color.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Racism disclaimer! Are we racist for citing statistics and research?” »
Racism disclaimer! Are we racist for citing statistics and researc…
» continues here »

I renounce my Female Legal Privileges

I renounce all my female legal and societal privilege, in in an irrevocable, legally binding notarized declaration.  As a strong, empowered woman, I am deeply offended by unequal treatment on the basis of gender on issues, like lifetime alimony, child support, DNA testing and paternity fraud, "domestic violence only against women act", rape shield and harassment laws. I can not change feminist anti-male laws. But I can renounce my female privilege [12] [13] [14] and I suggest every honest egalitarian woman to do the same. 

I hereby irrevocably renounce any privileges I enjoy by virtue of my female gender [6]
and I refuse to engage in discrimination against men [7].  Especially

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “I renounce my Female Legal Privileges” »
I renounce my Female Legal Privileges
» continues here »

Un-Scientific American lends credibility to Gender Junk Science about Hubble Telescope

Unscientific American: Diversity is strength: We did not make this up, all these titles really exist in the Junk Diversity IssueHubble telescope time preferentially goes to men.

Female-led proposals to use the in-demand Hubble telescope are less likely to be selected."  Scientific American claims this in the midst of a huge section of Junk Diversity Science which has been utterly debunked elsewhere.

An internal Hubble study1 found that in each of the past 11 observation proposal cycles, applications led by male principal investigators had a higher success rate than those led by women.  Women submit roughly 25% of proposals for Hubble telescope observing time. [SciAm]

Un-Scientific American lends credibility to junk diversity and gender science nonsense, by interspersing junk diversity propaganda among true natural science articles.
Un-Scientific American misleads their readers who think their gender baiting is on par with real science.

This confounding of junk gender science with true natural science is very serious. This is why after years of study even we need serious deprogramming from the politically correct cultural Marxist lies that impressible children, adolescents and adults are constantly told by school books and biased un-scientific journals like Scientific American!

Scientific American’s mixing of real natural science with politically motivated unscientific falsified junk science like gender, domestic violence, race and iq issues aspires to permanently poison the minds of young and old with feminist and politically correct hate ideology.

All the titles on our "Unscientific American" cover are true Junk Diversity Science articles,
we could not have made this up.

The head of a science department of a major research University confirmed to us, in private, that female scientists generally less innovative and talented then their male counterparts [7]. Implicit quotas demand hiring and promoting women who don’t meet the requirements men would be measured up to. Quotas guarantee that the rare woman with sufficient talent will be snatched away for an even more prestigious job, always rising to her level of incompetence. Aware of Larry Summer’s dismissal [8], our department head refuses to be identified.

"Scientific American used to be a great magazine but like any publishing venture headquartered in New York, it has gradually drifted into liberal never-never-land." [UnScientific American]

Men and women are equal by dogmatic fiat

Did Megan Urry control her statistics for yearly working hours, life time interest in science, years experience, work invested in the proposal, IQ, math talent of the applying scientists?

We wager a bet that the average male physics proposal writer, more so a Ivy League department chair, did not flunk their first physics exams in college, like Megan Urry herself and was interested in physics since tender age of 6, unlike Megan Urry [4] and other female applicants. Megan Urry (of course) ignores even the possibility that male and female applicants might be intrinsically different in some way.  Larry Summers was a victim of telling such truth that there is a dearth of women in the top talent for science and math.

In spite of IQ tests having been manipulated to elevate female IQ to the same level as males [Wikipedia],   there are twice as many men with IQ over 150: Men: either very clever or really stupid [Wikipedia] because of greater male variance on IQ and most other traits.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Un-Scientific American lends credibility to Gender Junk Science about Hubble Telescope” »
Un-Scientific American lends credibility to Gender Junk Science ab…
» continues here »

How diversity makes us smarter – What a lie!

 

How Diversity Makes Us Smarter – Not! Scientific American has been polluted by the same junk science that pervades our Universities’ politically correct cultural Marxist social science and humanities departments. Entire generations are being indoctrinated with falsehoods, in much more devious ways then communist Soviet Union and China were ever capable of.

Increasing gender diversity on corporate boards leads to declines in financial performance: the evidence

From time to time we refer to five longitudinal studies which show that increasing gender diversity on boards leads to declines in corporate financial performance. The studies are referred to in a number of posts, and have been included in a number of our documents. But we thought it might be useful to prepare a short briefing paper with details of the five studies and their full Abstracts, it’s here.  [7]

 

  1. Our public challenge of Laura Carstensen, EHRC Commissioner – FOI request |
  2. White men and lack of diversity ruined Google & Apple
  3. If we ‘need’ more women in boardrooms, do we ‘need’ more white sprinters in the Olympics 100 metres final?
  4. Punish more Asian and White Students – demands Eric Holder
  5. IQ tests prohibited for job requirement, mandatory at death row
  6. Scientific American’s table shows how Switzerland, Germany, Austria suffer from serious gender gap in Math and Computer Science, while engineering powerhouses Kyrgyzstan and Saudi Arabia are on the forefront with more female then male
  7. Note that women are hopelessly outcompeted by men in tennis, snooker, chess and, yes, cooking. 
  8. The Bell Curve shows clearly how IQ is the most solidly researched issue in Psychology. Highly recommended book!

 

Campaign for Merit in Business, which was launched early in 2012, has made a remarkable impact in a relatively short time. We’ve proven beyond all reasonable doubt that the ‘glass ceiling’ is a baseless conspiracy theory. Through exposing as fantasies, lies, delusions and myths, the arguments which said that increasing gender diversity in the boardroom (‘GDITB’) will improve corporate financial performance, we’ve destroyed the long-vaunted ‘business case’ for GDITB. We continue to publicise five longitudinal studies, all of which show that GDITB leads to declines in corporate financial performance. What else would we expect when businesses aren’t free to select the best people for their boards, regardless of gender? Proponents are left with little other than misrepresenting correlation as causation in pursuit of their social engineering programmes.

The Conservative-led coalition no longer challenges our assertion that the impact of GDITB on UK plc will inevitably be a negative one. And yet it continues to actively pursue GDITB.  [5]

 

We’ve put in FoI requests seeking evidence for the government’s previous claims that putting more women on boards will lead to performance improvement. None has ever been forthcoming. This hasn’t stopped the government from continuing to threaten legislated gender quotas for FTSE100 boards if they haven’t achieved female representation on their boards by 2015. In fact, they’re going further. We know from a recent report that next in the firing line will be the FTSE350, and that gender parity on boards is the longer-term goal. 6

An entire issue of Scientific American

has been utterly polluted by political correctness ,
with articles like:

The Inclusion Equation

  • State of the World’s Science 2014
  • Diversity in Science: Where Are the Data?
    Where are the data?

    Global figures on diversity in the science and engineering workforce are hard to come by, but what we know is not flattering

    Gender Gap

  • How women and men fare in doctoral studies around the world

     

  • In Pursuit of the Best Ideas

  • In a diverse team, the best ideas are more likely to rise to the top

     

  • Becoming Visible

  • To change the equation, start changing the perception

     

  • Particular Points of View

  •   Gender and culture influence research on a fundamental level

     

  • Inviting Everyone In

  • There is no formula for bringing diversity to the workplace or classroom, but new research that deepens our understanding of how diversity operates suggests some modestly successful strategies

     

  • How Diversity Works

  • Being around people who are different from us makes us more creative, more diligent and harder-working

     

  • Science Exposed

  • Networked technology and social media are enabling outsiders to gather and crunch data

     

  • Taking It Personally

    How a researcher’s background can determine her mission

    •  

    Hacked nude celebrity photos may be child pornography

     

    Child Porn claims to scare sites into taking down photos

    Olympic gymnast McKayla Maroney claimed her nude photos are child porn, to scare web sites into removing her photos. 

    Maroney’s lawyers confirmed that the leaked nude images of the U.S. gymnast were taken at the time when she was not yet 18. This means that the people who are involved in the leak and those who are storing copies of the images on their PCs could face a lawsuit on child abuse  Tech Times

    But: Children photographing themselves are child porn producers

    Little was McKayla Maroney aware she was incriminating herself of a heinous crime: "McKayla Maroney may be a victim of the leaked photo scandal, but she could be facing felony charges for child pornography." [2].  Any 17 or under "child" that takes photo of herself in any indecent pose, is a producer of child pornography (sexting). And mere possession of child pornography is punishable up to life in prison [3] [4] 

    Child pornography can be fully dressed photos of 17 year olds

    Deliberately posed pictures of children [up to 17 years of age] fully clothed, partially clothed or naked can be child pornography. If the dirty mind of a district attorney or policeman officer considers baby’s pose indecent, then Family pictures of nude baby bath can cause ruinous child porn prosecution.

    Use a Polaroid, not the "cloud"

    "Stars who want to take nude photos without getting hacked: Use a Polaroid: To keep private pictures private, never upload them online."[Fox News].

     

    Will anyone question the stupidity of child pornography laws?

    Only Human-Stupidity dares to ridicule voodoo theory, to  denounce child porn hysteria in 70 posts, to cite Milton Diamond‘s peer reviewed research and infamous Rind Study 

      

    Sex offender earns right to assisted suicide (Belgium’s Frank van den Bleeken)

    BBC) — A Belgian man serving a life sentence for rape and murder will be allowed to have doctors end his life, after a landmark ruling.
    Unable to control his violent sexual urges, Frank Van Den Bleeken, who is 50, argued he would never be freed.
    The decision follows a three-year legal battle by the prisoner, who was convicted in the 1980s.
    The ruling is the first involving a prisoner since the assisted dying law was introduced in Belgium 12 years ago.
    Van Den Bleeken will soon be transferred to a hospital where the medical procedure will take place, his lawyers told reporters.
    "But I cannot say when or where that will happen," Jos Vander Velpen added.   [read more at BBC News, Reddit comments]

    Compare [Newsweek] [Sydney Herald] [Daily Mail] [BBC News]

    Human-Stupidity Analysis

    Thinking of victims‘ human rights, of protection of future victims of sex offenses and rape, assisted suicide looks like a good option. Sort of like a voluntary death penalty.

    Of course, there are issues of victimless crime, *consensual *rape,  people left to die in prison for groping adolescents in the 1970ies, or life in prison for possession of photos. Should these be allowed to die?

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Sex offender earns right to assisted suicide (Belgium’s Frank van den Bleeken)” »
    Sex offender earns right to assisted suicide (Belgium’s Fran…
    » continues here »