Tag: rape

Rape Hysteria’s legal proceedings questioned by Spiked Online

Feminist rape hysteria re-defines and extends rape definitions with manipulative language, abolishes due process, and infantilizes women whose enthusiastic consent is frequently invalid. The goal is to convict as many men as possible, for the most flimsy and unproven accusations, even if the alleged crime stems from the 1970’ies. False rape revenge accusations are always to be believed and to be taken at face value, liars almost never punished.

Britain’s Spiked-Online is one of the few sites opposing the rape hysteria. We recommend clicking on the links to read the  following articles in their entirety, also Barbara Hewson‘s writings.

The Sexual Offences Act 2003 declared that consent must be ‘active, not passive’; in rape cases, consent is now taken to mean agreement rather than the absence of a refusal. So if a woman goes along with sex, but doesn’t make it explicitly clear that she is actively consenting to it, it can be deemed to be rape. The government has even moved towards ensuring that no agreement can be taken as consent if it is given under the influence of alcohol.  [1]

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Rape Hysteria’s legal proceedings questioned by Spiked Online” »
Rape Hysteria’s legal proceedings questioned by Spiked Onlin…
» continues here »

Child rapist raped, stitched by medics, and re-raped by 20 prisoners

  

Jiu Jitsu Professor Daryell Dickson Menezes Xavier beat up and raped his 1 year 8 months old step son in Taguatinga, suburb of Brasilia. He turned himself in, with his lawyer, and was held for a 30 day 

Daryell was raped by about 20 prisoners. He had injuries all over the body, the most serious ones in the anal region. Insatisfied, and still furious about the crime committed by the professor, the prisoners tore apart the stitches that he received and raped him again. The blood stains on the rear of the short of the young man are proof of how much he suffered.

Source: Rapist of one year old boy gets paid back double dose [3‘] [4] [5] [6]

 Alleged child rapist turned over to 20 prisoners, raped, gets anus stitched and turned over again to his rapists Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Child rapist raped, stitched by medics, and re-raped by 20 prisoners” »
Child rapist raped, stitched by medics, and re-raped by 20 prisone…
» continues here »

Convicted false rape accuser Heidi K. will not pay damages to falsely imprisoned Horst Arnold

Teacher Horst Arnold served his 5 year prison term for rape to the very last day. Soon thereafter a high court declared him obviously innocent and the accusations blatantly false. Still, he was not reinstated to the job he had lost. His false accuser, still anonymous, escapes financial damages by infinite appeals, using government paid lawyers. The real victim of her false accusations has to pay legal fees and thus threw the towel. The false accuser still receives government pension but applied legal trickery to make sure the victim of her accusation can never get at that money.

 

The teacher Heidi K. falsely accused her now deceased colleague Horst Arnold of rape. Arnold had five years in prison, was acquitted recently. Shortly thereafter, he died. Now it is official: Heidi K. will not have to pay damages to his daughter.

  • Even now, the false accuser’s last name is secret. "Heidi K". She is photographed with her face covered.  And the falsely convicted victim’s name is public.  It is disgusting.

    • The case of the teacher Horst Arnold,  accused wrongly of rape,  was one of the most spectacular miscarriages of justice in recent history. His colleague, Heidi K. had brought him to court, he was jailed, was later acquitted, but died shortly afterwards.

    The formerly in shape sports teacher died a broken man, having lost his house, money, job, reputation and health after an unjust 5 year prison term

    Horst Arnold’s daughter Heidi K. sued for damages. Now it is official: Heidi K. will not have to pay. Heidi K. gave up, due to excessive legal costs and small chance to actually receive the financial compensation.

    False accuser gets 5 1/2 years in prison for 5 year imprisonment of an innocent man

    Here is the good news: Heidi K got a 5 1/2 years prison term as a notorious and patholgical liar, pending appeal. (German). She  still remains anonymous and shamelessly uses government-paid lawyers to avoid paying her victim’s heirs. She was sentenced for false imprisonment. She could not be prosecuted for false accusations due to statute of limitations.

     

    Perverted Justice system imprisons innocent men with no due process 

    This begs the question: how has feminist rape hysteria managed to totally pervert due process in  our justice system , that any psychologically deranged woman can get a decent law abiding man into prison with the most absurd and incoherent rape accusations.

    In the original rape trial "the prosecution could not present any conclusive evidence, but the court believed Heidi K., amd followed their presentation in full. […] She had Charisma and could convince people. In her tears, evidence seemed to crystalize" [4] Impeccably groomed Heidi K. had taught class, minutes after the alleged rape in a much frequented room, after an alleged escape over a fire ladder and vomiting. Her anal fissure was found in her second medical exam, non-existent in the first exam. She alleged to have been threatened by the accused, a week after the fake rape. But the accuse had a good alibi he was in prison. In spite of such glaring inconsistencies, Horst Arnold was convicted. Felow teachers became suspicious only after several more years of Heidi K. telling fabulous stories that would make Baron von Münchhausen blush. The erroneous expert witnesses, and shoddy justice officials suffered no punishment at all. [4 5]

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Convicted false rape accuser Heidi K. will not pay damages to falsely imprisoned Horst Arnold” »
    Convicted false rape accuser Heidi K. will not pay damages to fals…
    » continues here »

    Help! My 18 year old girl friend has raped me 298 times

    "Please stop", he begged her. "I already came, I am tired, I need to sleep". To no avail. 19 year old Maria (name has been changed) will not take no for an answer. She straddles his face, pushes her pussy onto his mouth, taking his breath away: " Make me come!"  she demands of the groggy, sleepy, half drunk Paul (name has been changed). After one screaming orgasm, she puts a condom on his member and rides herself, cowgirl style, to another orgasm, over Paul’s protests.

    During the first 290 rapes (or "sexual assaults" , in some jurisdictions) Paul did not know he was a victim of rape, or felony sexual assault. That the constant barrage of sexual assaults by a gorgeous 19 year old blonde was deeply traumatizing for him. and would scar him for life. He was unaware that he was a date rape or marital rape survivor.

    He already knew that feminists had re-defined rape.  That consent could be withdrawn at any moment. That "No means No". That a man got convicted for 5 second *rape because he stopped only 5 seconds after the hitherto consenting girl said "stop".

    Still Paul was unaware that he was a rape victim. He thought that rape hysteria was a feminist ruse.

    Then he started reading avoiceformen and r/mensrights. The leading men’s rights web sites. There he found out that MRA actually agree with most of the feminist rape hysteria,  as long as pretty 25 year old female cheer leaders also get punished [4] for having sex with  220 pound 17 year old adolescent football player hunk victims.  

    He read how boys and men are frequent rape victims:  Boys raped more often than girls. Eivind Berge The Antifeminist

    Paul is still getting raped almost daily, but now he is aware that he is a victim of a terrible crime. Paul is asking for your advice:

    1. Is he actually getting raped or sexually assaulted?
    2. Is he traumatized for life
    3. Should he go to police and press charges against his abuser?
    4. Will he be believed? You know, women never lie about rape. But will they think men lie about rape (sexual assault).
    5. Should he record the sex act and his protests, to have PROOF of the vile crime he suffers from?
    6. Should he just enjoy the sex and then, a few years later, file charges of rape, like many women do nowadays? Or 40 years later, like in the Saville case
    7. He actually likes the sex in the morning. It is rape only in the evening. If she goes to prison for many years, he will miss it.  (this is not a joke; there was a case where a woman pressed rape charges. Among 30 sex acts, only #25 and #18 were rapes, the others, she confided, were consensual)

    Please answer the questions  in the comments below

     

    Further comments and questions

    1. Be aware, if the "victim" was a woman, the male "rapist" would be convicted, no doubt.
    2. Should MRA (men’s rights activists) be only concerned to make sure that a woman "rapist" would be treated with equal rigor. Or should MRA actually be concerned to keep men out of prison for travesties like 32-year-old man’s sex with 17-year-old was legal… but pictures of it cost him 8 years in prison. Note too that feminists are seriously concerned with keeping female husband assassins out of prison and successfully do so: How to Kill your Husband! A Tutorial. (Susan Falls’ Licence to Kill) .
    3. According to Human-Stupidity’s research, most sexually active heterosexual men suffered "rape" episodes like the above. Remember: once you say now, even in the slightest way, consensual sex becomes RAPE: Consensual sex becomes rape as soon as woman says "I need to go home", says California Supreme Court..
    4. Please report if you were victim or perpetrator of such rape, or if this never happened in your life.

    Barack Obama Sr., bigamist, pedophile, child rapist?

    Barack Obama Jr. was likely conceived when his mother was still 17 years old. [1]

    According to federal law this is below the age of consent. A 17 year old *child is unable to consent, which automatically makes any act of sex rape.  "Rape is rape is rape"  (according to Barack Obama’s pal and Vice President  Joe Biden).

    Luckily, the age of consent in Hawaii is 16. So if sex occurred in Hawaii, it was not rape.

    Of course, in these modern days, Barack Obama Sr. still could be charged with crimes as diverse as grooming a child over the internet, sexting, crossing state lines with intent to have sex with a minor,

    Barack Obama Sr. already had shown prior preference for jailbait. Kenyan age of consent for unmarried people is 16. Kezia, born 1940,  was 14 when 18 year old Barack Senior married  her in 1954, in exchange for a dowry of 14 cows. 

    In 1954, Obama married Kezia Aoko[22] in a tribal ceremony. Wikipedia

    Kezia had her first baby at age 18. Maybe conceived at age 17.

    Anyone can do the math if Kezia Obama’s first child was conceived while the mother was still 17?

    Had Barack Obama Senior been a US resident, it would have been a felony to fly to Kenya with the intent to have sex with an underage girl under 18.

     

    Human-Stupidity Analysis

    We think it would behoove the US government to re-consider many age of consent, sexting, child porn laws, that put many men in prison for consensual sex with post pubertal adolescents.

    Many men languish in prison for the same acts that the father of President Barack Obama committed: sex with adolescent jail bait.

    Consider that Barack Obama, the President of the USA was likely conceived by an unmarried 17 year old woman. The president’s father, Barack Hussein Sr. also had a predilection for underage girls as young as 14, the age he married his first wife Kezia.

    The fact that the President’s father was a clear bigamist, married to 2-3 women at the same time would suggest to pursue bigamist US citizens with more leniency.

     

    The American Dream Love Story:
    Barack Obama’s Mom Was 17 When Barack Sr., A 24-Year-Old Married Man, Knocked Her Up

    Let’s ask a question that I haven’t seen before:

    How old was Ann Dunham when Barack Obama Sr., an already married 24-year-old, impregnated her?

     

     

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Barack Obama Sr., bigamist, pedophile, child rapist?” »
    Barack Obama Sr., bigamist, pedophile, child rapist?
    » continues here »

    False rape accusers are "victims" in need for protection and anonymity

    Feminist and PC (political correctness) language abuse have no bounds: a false rape accuser is a "victim", often her face is still pixelated in photos, to protect her victim identity.

    Rarely is it said that she is the lying perjuring aggressor, who wreaked havoc on the life of an innocent falsely accused man, and wasted  police time pursuing a false  crime report. Of course, by feminist creed, women are never to blame for their crimes and misdeeds.

    Campus activists say their university perpetuated ‘victim blaming’ because of the way it handled — a false rape claim:

    Campus activists say their university perpetuated ‘victim blaming’ because of the way it handled — a false rape   claim

    We pause to allow you to do a double-take. The president of the Feminist Action League is upset because a crime alert regarding a false sexual assault put emphasis on "something other than the attack."  Um, there was no attack. And note that the president of the Feminist Action League is not upset because a crime alert was issued over a false sexual assault claim.

    It is typical for political correctness and lying feminist theory that facts don’t count. The woman is a victim, always, no exception. If she is a murderess, she is a victim and suffers from battered woman syndrome. If she made a false rape report, the man can learn from the experience of being in jail and getting threatened and possibly raped by hard core criminal inmates.

    The school newspaper has written an article using the false report to help raise awareness about . . . sexual assault.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “False rape accusers are "victims" in need for protection and anonymity” »
    False rape accusers are "victims" in need for protection…
    » continues here »

    British judge frees child-rapist because he “didn’t know it was wrong”

     

    18 year old Muslim immigrant Adil Rashid was convicted of statutory rape of a 13 year old girl he met on the internet.

    When he went to be sentenced, he told Judge Michael Stokes that he didn’t know it was illegal. He said he attended private Muslim school in Britain and that they had not educated him on British law.

    Stokes said that was good enough for him and freed the Rashid with no punishment. TopConservativeNews

    Judge Stokes sentenced Rashid to nine months youth custody, suspended for two years, along with a two-year probation supervision order, instead of a more normal 5 year prison term. 2

    Back in January, there was a profoundly disturbing case at Nottingham Crown Court. Adil Rashid, who had “raped” an underage girl, was spared a prison term after the judge heard that the naïve 18-year-old attended an Islamic faith school where he was taught that women are worthless. Rashid told psychologists he had no idea that having sex with a willing 13-year-old was against the law;

    Even for a normal well informed citizen, being up to date on all underage sex laws is quite difficult.

    Would you know the legal ramification of a 6 year old an and 8 year old playing doctor in your state and the nearest 2 adjacent states or countries? Or of two 25 year olds kissing in Abu Dhabi?  Would you know You can have sex with your legal 17 year old wife. But just don’t photograph her! Or else risk 15 years in jail!.

    Feminist language abuse has caused such utter confusion like

    besides, his education had taught him to believe that “women are no more worthy than a lollipop that has been dropped on the ground”.

    This is a very different issue, though feminists might want to confound it.  We have great respect of women, so much that we think a 13 year old knows what *consent is, knows to say yes and no. Even more so 17 year old "children" know to say yes or no.

    If the fresh-faced Rashid had picked up that view in a madrassa in Karachi it would be profoundly depressing, though not surprising. But the school he attended was in Birmingham, for heaven’s sake! Although it cannot be named for “legal reasons”, the school is voluntary-aided – mainly funded by the taxpayer. At this hugely popular Islamic school, where a majority of pupils are from a Pakistani background, boys and girls are taught in separate classes; a segregation policy no normal comprehensive could get away with.

    Again, another issue. Muslim "culture" that does not integrate at all with British culture but remain a parallel culture.

    This leads to more serious problems, if Muslim boys that despise inferior women use real non-consensual *rape-rape on young British girls.

    Oxford grooming gang: We will regret ignoring Asian thugs who target white girls

    What a god-awful mess this country has got itself into over multiculturalism, and once again our fear of racism will lead to the betrayal of hundreds of young girls

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “British judge frees child-rapist because he “didn’t know it was wrong”” »
    British judge frees child-rapist because he “didn’t kn…
    » continues here »

    Paul Elam’s Jury Nullification applies only to VIOLENT sex offenders?

    The main stream of the men’s rights movement is not worried about men’s sexual freedom. Notable exceptions are the antifeminist and sites linked in his right side bar.

    The following post is about the internal rift between the father’s rights main wing of MRA, and the few true men’s rights activists that want to free men from persecution for normal male sexuality.

    Google "Paul Elam jury nullification" 1 2.3 4 6 7 You find Paul Elam at avoiceformen would want all of these forcible rapists set free, because in today’s climate they can get no due process. I thought he was pretty courageous to suggest jury nullification, because really, men can not get due process when accused of rape. Most likely Paul wants to make a provocative statement, to cast light on unjust *rape laws.

    But I wonder:

    Does Paul Elam’s Jury Nullification apply only to violent sex offenders?

    The rest of the sex offenders also suffer from lack of due process . Rarely their "crimes" are proven beyond reasonable doubt. Non-forcible *rape, or child abuse, reported long after the fact are hard to prove with good corroborating evidence.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Paul Elam’s Jury Nullification applies only to VIOLENT sex offenders?” »
    Paul Elam’s Jury Nullification applies only to VIOLENT sex o…
    » continues here »