Posts tagged ‘Human Rights’

"Family Court" tramples due process, puts men into life long indentured slavery, confiscates property worth Millions and Billions, confiscates future income and pension, re-instated debtor’s prison where men are imprisoned for a decade for non-payment of spousal support to the slave owner. "Family Court" accepts hearsay as proof enough to kick a man out of his home (SAID: Sexual Allegations in Divorce). Ex parte (one party accusation) orders are based on the flimsiest of evidence or upon mere accusations, "temporary" orders allow unconstitutional orders to be extended for years on end. "Protection from Abuse" (restraining) orders, like all other abominations of family court, abuse mostly men and confer special rights upon women.  Human Rights are enforced for criminals, but not for law abiding family men.

We recommend you read the entire post we excerpt here

American Family Courts, the First Amendment, and Violations of Free Speech

Family Court.  What a friendly sounding name. A court for families, so open and inviting.

A place where families are welcome and invited, a place for families to bring their troubles and disagreements, where there are people specially trained to help them with their problems, and where issues can be resolved in a fair compromise, so that everyone can be happy. […]

How true. What a promising nice name

And yet, nothing could be better Orwellianly named than this institution; there is nothing friendly about it. It is a snakepit of anguish and despair, impacting millions of people each year.

By re-casting all familial issues into a mutated type of civil court action variously termed  “special proceedings”, and by radically recasting the concepts of just what a judicial court is, e.g., its procedures, discretions and evidentiary standards, the state had effectively done away with all the inconvenient and expensive due process and constitutional protections required in every other American court.

While retaining the traditional powers of a judicial court – enforcement, fines and imprisonment – none of the checks and balances against those powers were concomitantly retained. Expedience of process and the legitimization of raw state power was the goal.

In creating these special “People’s Courts”  – not-quite-criminal, not-quite-civil – dozens of  due process protections were sloughed away leaving a raw, grinning changeling in its place.

Domestic violence abuse is based on falsified science and enforced by unconstitutional family court. SAID: Sexual Allegations in Divorce is a potent weapon thanks to complicity of family courts. Debtor’s prison longer then a decade has been reinstated under the guise of "contempt of court".

Constitutional procedural protections against self-incrimination, right to an attorney, presumptions of innocence, right to jury were done away with.

Inviolable substantive rights to federal parenting guarantees, property and liberty, became optional concerns and subordinate to statutory directives. Legal financial obligations to others persons were created out of whole cloth and determined from the flimsiest allegations.

The rights to financial and medical privacy were extorted away, as was the Constitutional right to free travel.

Astonishing. Men can get deprived of their passports to prevent them from fleeing their indentured wage slavery. Fugitive slave laws are still in effect world wide: Robert Sand: ‘Most wanted deadbeat dad’ arrested in Thailand for owing millions to his slave owner wife.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘American Family Courts’ wholesale destruction of constitutional rights’ » »
American Family Courts’ wholesale destruction of constitutio… » continues here »

Share

The international Conference on Men’s Issues in Detroit is in danger because of threats of violence against people, property, the hotel and the surrounding inner city properties. Feminism, and political correctness pretend to be "good", but if necessary are fully prepared to use violence.

  1. Read the comments there

 

Feminist violence has happened before:

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Violence: Feminist’s threaten Men’s Right’s Conference in Detroit’ » »
Violence: Feminist’s threaten Men’s Right’s Conf… » continues here »

Share

2 days before his 18th birthday, a career criminal gangster kills his ex-girlfriend and sends the pictures to friends and enemies. In the Brazil of ECA (statute of the child and the adolescent), a coming of age party can be celebrated with a corpse.

Ex girl friend Yorraly Ferreira had gotten involved with gangsters of a rival gang and thus angered him enough to be punished with a deadly shot.

He sent a recording of the crime to friends and enemies. He thus demonstrated his power and made clear he should not be messed with. Yorraly Ferreira’s actual boyfriend posted the photo of her corpse on his FaceBook page "Rest in peace, my love". Thus the name of confessed killer Henrique Aquino dos Santos’s became known, even though the law assures an underage criminal’s anonymity, and his photos can not be shown.

Source: Veja Brazil | Correio | G1 | Jusbrasil

He will not be punished but suffer 3 years of socio-educational measures, after which he will be be released with a clean criminal record.

I repeat: in 3 years he can apply as a job as a policeman, as an elementary school teacher, because he will have a squeaky clean criminal record. The murder and prior robbery covictions will be wiped clean. Like this serial killer

14 year old murdered 8, will kill 3 more when freed in 45 days. Liberal child protection law run amok in Brazil.

Brazil‘s ECA (Statute of children and adolescents law is an example for well meant liberal political correctness run amok. No matter how many horrendous crimes an under 18 year old commits, s/he will only be sent for educational measures of maximum 3 years, and will receive a clean police record after age 18.

Human Rights  tend to favor thugs, and put the rights of 17 year old male murderers above women’s rights and domestic violence laws. Brazil‘s ECA is the worst example.

Share

"Good" firebombing, police killing"protestors" in Ukraine

"Good" police killing, firebombing "protestors" are defended by PC Western countries. The protesters want close ties with the European Union, while the democratic government wants ties with traditional ally Russia. Russia-banging is politically correct, after all Russia opposes teaching homosexuality to minors. (Spiked : Gay-loving Westerners vs. redneck Russia)

Video of Ukrainian Mob violence


 

Shoot Hooligans in self defense

We at Human-Stupidity are anti-violence. Hooligans that throw heavy cobblestones and Molotov Cocktails onto innocent police men (ahem police officers) should be shot in self defense. We proposed the same during London Riots and other riots. These cowardly hooligans will withdraw, once their violence is met with an equal response. 

We propose Human Rights for good citizens:

The Human-Right not to have one’s houses burned down, not to be attacked on the street, the Human-Right for good people should trump human rights of Hooligans. Good people should have the human right not to be attacked with deadly weapons, not to have their houses firebombed.

In the above video we can see an empowered woman throwing a cobblestone on a nearby police man (we doubt that many police women will be put in harm’s way). Why does police need to tolerate such a life threatening behavior? Yes: human rights are for criminals

EU to discuss sanctions after Ukraine’s bloodiest day

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘EU weighs sanctions to protect violent murderous "protestors" in Ukraine’ » »
EU weighs sanctions to protect violent murderous "protestors&… » continues here »

Share

When will Paris and London follow Singapore’s example? So ordinary citizens in London and Paris are not exposed to three day long riots that burn down entire city blocks. We believe it is criminal omission, when armed police don’t interfere and instead watch rioters setting family businesses ablaze.

The riot on December 8, Singapore’s worst outbreak of violence in four decades, saw hundreds of South Asian workers go on a rampage that left 39 people, including police officers, injured and 25 vehicles damaged or burnt.

It was triggered after an Indian construction worker was hit by a bus and killed at a district known as Little India, where tens of thousands of South Asian labourers converge on weekends.  source

This is the problem. In civilized society we don’t riot because of a traffic accident. We civilized people don’t riot at all.

But any mishap that happens to Blacks justifies mayhem

Human-Rights, nowadays are always for criminals. Human Rights are concerned with the right of criminals and thugs like Rodney King, Trayvon Martin

 

Activists say the swift punishments being handed out contravene basic human rights.

Here is the problem. Human Rights encourage riots and violence.

Political correctness tells people that their misfortune, their unskilled job is never due to low intelligence, low effort, bad parents, or lack of impulse control (which leads to violent crime and rioting).

Rather we tell these menial workers that they could have become engineers, or bank managers, were it not for heinous discrimination.  Thus Political correctness dogma incites "justified" anger in people, against their repressors.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Singapore fails to recognize human rights of rioters. Fantastic!’ » »
Singapore fails to recognize human rights of rioters. Fantastic! » continues here »

Share

Zimmerman’s guilt could not be proven

Top: 5 years ago little Trayvon and Geore on his booking photo  looked like thisGeorge Zimmerman is considered guilty in the public opinion. George, vigorously pursued little weak innocent Trayvon Martin, and gunned down an unarmed teenager who only carried skittles and ice tea and who dreamed of . Defense lawyer Marc O’Mara managed to raise reasonable doubt. Thus the jury had to acquit, because Zimmerman’s guilt could not clearly be proven beyond reasonable doubt. Zimmerman is guilty, but the prosecution just failed to to convincingly prove Zimmerman’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

George Zimmerman‘s lawyer Marc O’Mara’s defense won a battle but lost the war. George Zimmerman is a world-wide pariah. We read the press in Germany and Brazil.

 

trayvon-with-babyMSN Brazil calls Zimmermann Assassin.
  • Press media’s lies, deceit about George Zimmermann trial
  • George Zimmermann Acquitted: Victim of Government and Black Racism ("Der Spiegel" lügt: George Zimmerman, Opfer von schwarzem Rassismus und Verleumdungen)

     

     

     

     

     

     


    Below recent photos of Martin and Zimmerman


    Sheep succumbs to attack dog
    Aggressive, well trained Al Sharpton

    faces off with toothless lawyer Marc O’Mara

    Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

     

    Al Sharpton Grills George Zimmerman’s Attorney In Long, Contentious Interview

    How civil rights activists and the press would like to picture Trayvon Martin and George ZimmermannA firmly convinced partisan Al Sharpton

    Sharpton asked O’Mara how Zimmerman can plead self-defense if, as heard in the 911 tape, he was actively pursuing Martin, contrary to the advice of the operator.

    Al Sharpton firmly tells a damaging narrative "Zimmerman chased Martin". Sharpton is firm and convinced, and thus convincing. Sharpton does not care about evidence, proof, or if his story is true or not. He firmly believes what he says and thus convincing( Robert Trivers: Self deception, Robert Kurzban).  He is unimpeded by doubts, reasonableness, fairness. A partisan. Al Sharpton does not care if it is true or not.

    A pondering, objective, unsure O’MaraHow Media would like to depict them (Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman)

    O’Mara argued that there’s no conclusive evidence to suggest continued pursuit, nor is there evidence Zimmerman initiated any physical confrontation

    O’Mara’s lame reply comes over like this: "Well, Zimmerman is guilty, he chased down the poor teenager and started the fight. But it can not be conclusively proven. Of course, I understand and respect your opinion, Mr. Sharpton, but you can not prove it"

    OK, he did not say this, but that is what it sounds to an unsophisticated TV viewer that has been exposed to the relentless smear campaign against George Zimmerman.

    Marc O’Mara seems to be trying himself to figure out what really happened and who started the fight. A reasoned, legalese, open minded opinion behooves a judge, not a defense lawyer, much less a TV propagandist.

     

    Marc O’Mara lacks aggressive forward defense and counter attack

    1) tell the truth

    Mr. Sharpton, you are dreaming. Mr. Zimmerman stopped and waited, Trayvon Martin came back and viciously assaulted and attacked George. 

    obama-if-i-had-a-son-hed-look-like-trayvon-birth-certificate-sad-hill-news-33

    2) challenge: Sharpton’s story is preposterous and makes no sense
    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘George Zimmerman verdict: guilty in public opinion. Lawyer Mark O’Mara’s toothless defense is the culprit’ » »
    George Zimmerman verdict: guilty in public opinion. Lawyer Mark O&… » continues here »

    Share

    George Zimmerman is an assassin. MSN Brazil spreads this slanderous news in their Brazilian version. George Zimmerman was acquitted and thus must not be called a murderer or assassin. 

    Not satisfied with the normal lies and deceit in the George Zimmerman case, MSN resort to illegal slander. Good for George, to get multi million dollar lawsuit against msn. Before, CBS had doctored the 911 tapes and is being sued by George Zimmerman

    Americanos saem às ruas para pedir justiça contra assassino de Trayvon Martin

    IMG_21072013_081229

    George Zimmerman has been the victim of a concerted defamation campaign ever since black civil rights leaders got wind of the case.

     

    They lied to you, hid evidence.
    Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors

     

    Dear Jurors,

    you have been lied to, misled, deceived. Above all, judge and lawyers withheld relevant information from you.

    Nevertheless, the George Zimmerman case was so clear cut, that you, the Jury, still arrived at the right verdict.  In spite of relentless attempts to mislead you, and in spite of relevant facts having been hidden from you.

    But, sadly, you had and still have doubts as to Zimmerman’s innocence. You were far from totally convinced of George Zimmerman‘s innocence, beyond reasonable doubt.

    [It is the] media’s claim last year that a neighborhood-watch captain in Florida [George Zimmerman] had hunted down a black teenager [Trayvon Martin] and shot him dead just for wearing a hoodie. 1

    1. If it were not for criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey this trial would not exist
    2. Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at a place where he had been 4 minutes earlier.
    3. The media and the prosecution never came up with a coherent story of what they think has happened.
    4. Trayvon Martin, on suspension for drugs, for punching bus driver. A violent burglar upset about being followed?  Texts show Trayvon Martin ‘hostile’ day of shooting
    5. The prosecution’s main witnesses are Martin’s intimate friends and family that have been carefully prepared by "civil rights activists" and lawyers as to what to say (or lie).
    6. (6) Trayvon Martin’s shady thuggish character, Black crime and ghetto rap culture
    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow?’ » »
    MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow? » continues here »

    Share

    Dear Jurors,

    you have been lied to, misled, deceived. Above all, judge and lawyers withheld relevant information from you.

    Nevertheless, the George Zimmerman case was so clear cut, that you, the Jury, still arrived at the right verdict.  In spite of relentless attempts to mislead you, and in spite of relevant facts having been hidden from you.

    But, sadly, you had and still have doubts as to Zimmerman’s innocence. You were far from totally convinced of George Zimmerman‘s innocence, beyond reasonable doubt.

    [It is the] media’s claim last year that a neighborhood-watch captain in Florida [George Zimmerman] had hunted down a black teenager [Trayvon Martin] and shot him dead just for wearing a hoodie. 1

    1. If it were not for criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey this trial would not exist
    2. Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at a place where he had been 4 minutes earlier.
    3. The media and the prosecution never came up with a coherent story of what they think has happened.
    4. Trayvon Martin, on suspension for drugs, for punching bus driver. A violent burglar upset about being followed?  Texts show Trayvon Martin ‘hostile’ day of shooting
    5. The prosecution’s main witnesses are Martin’s intimate friends and family that have been carefully prepared by "civil rights activists" and lawyers as to what to say (or lie).
    6. (6) Trayvon Martin’s shady thuggish character, Black crime and ghetto rap culture

     

     

     

    (1) The trial could only start due to criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey

    .There never was a case that an honest prosecutor could have brought to court, and that an unbiased judge would have allowed to proceed.

     

    In reference to the George Zimmerman trial’s whistleblower who lost his job at the State Attorney’s Office, Dershowitz says Angela Corey should face “disciplinary action” for “deliberately withholding and suppressing” evidence submitted to George Zimmerman’s defense and the judge. He claims Corey “withheld other evidence in the course of the pretrial and trial proceedings.”  7

    You would arrive at the conclusion that Zimmermann is innocent beyond reasonable doubt, and that Trayvon Martin is a murderous aggressor, beyond reasonable doubt.

     

    (2) Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at the place where he had been 240 seconds earlier.

    Path and time line

    The final fight and the killing happened about 60 yards from Zimmerman’s car and 60 yards from Trayvon Martin’s destination. Trayvon Martin, without any doubt, returned to where he was a few minutes before. This is inevitable logic, because the fight happened where Zimmermann was originally.

    Two maps trying to explain George’s and Trayvon’s path

    trayvon-martin-george-zimmerman-map-with-911-call-timing-v-3-1

     

     

    If the prosecution and the press were right, out of shape Zimmermann  chased after football athlete Trayvon.

    Trayvon could have simply entered his house, but chose not to do so. Trayvon could have simply outrun Zimmerman but chose not to do so.

     

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors’ » »
    They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman… » continues here »

    Share